Aids?
One gaffer had a thread like this and made it clear that he had a 1 week rule, where if he found out you were cheating on your significant other he gave you 1 week to tell them or he would do it for you no matter what.What's the one week rule?
One gaffer had a thread like this and made it clear that he had a 1 week rule, where if he found out you were cheating on your significant other he gave you 1 week to tell them or he would do it for you no matter what.
Oh bullshit, something good almost always comes of it. They break up, the victim gets to date someone who actually cares about them. I'd call that good.
Because some people actually have empathy for others, even if they're strangers.
I'm glad people haven't brought up bro codes and whatnot, because they are all irrelevant if he risk hurting his wife both psychologically and physically, by being a cheat and possibly get some STD that he might pass onto her.
Take your cousin to a gay bar.
Man it's been too long since I read that, does anyone have a link to that thread I'd love to reread it.He also said only poor and uneducated "thugs" cheat.
There will be three types of people in this thread. The "don't tell her" group - usually these people will have negative personal experiences where they told and it ruined their relationship with both people, or they'll go all bro-code.
The second type will insist you inform a third-party. This is probably most reasonable.
The third type will insist you tell her, and they will argue with the first type throughout most of the thread. Have fun, ladies and gentlemen.
I have to disagree. It's really not his place to enforce what is essentially a bilateral contract, particularly since it does not appear as though he has any relationship of significance to the man's wife.God another one of these threads of "it's not your place to tell her" cockameme bullshit. Just do it, anyone deserves to know when their spouse or SO is being a philandering shithead. If she already knows then no sweat off your back.
I agree with this. She deserves to know his shitheadedness.
It's not his place to say anything as it would cause unnecessary drama for all involved.
Also is the drama pretty much inevitable.Uhh, if someone is cheating, that drama is quite necessary actually. She deserves to know so she can move on to a better relationship.
Announcing that you have someone on ignore would seem to belie the point.Ah, good ol' Devolution posts. Never see 'em unless they are quoted.
It's not his place to say anything as it would cause unnecessary drama for all involved. But if the OP wants to fall on that sword, more power to ya.
There's no evidence that he slept with another woman. Not even circumstantial evidence. Doesn't seem like it would be right to potentially break up a marriage over an assumption.Find a way to contact the wife and tell her. The sooner she finds out, the better, so she can leave the asshole and not continue to waste her time. The longer she's in this relationship, the less time she could be dating someone that actually cares about her.
Uhh, if someone is cheating, that drama is quite necessary actually. She deserves to know so she can move on to a better relationship.
Uhh, if someone is cheating, that drama is quite necessary actually. She deserves to know so she can move on to a better relationship.
Announcing that you have someone on ignore would seem to belie the point.
Don't be a twat.
How often does this really happen? The "volunteered" wingman.
I'd normally say get involved, but you basically know nothing about those people or their relationship. I'd stay out of it.
This is completely different from that other GAF thread where the OP knew the girl directly, and everyone was still telling him to stay out of it. I really disagreed with that.
Because you're the only person in this frequently recurring type of thread to suggest that non-intervention is the best course?A twat? Like calling me a twat for responding to a comment that basically quoted me in an asinine way? GTFO
Given the options you've presented, it does seem pretty black-and-white?1. He has no real proof, and doesn't even know for sure, if the guy is cheating.
2. He has no idea what the relationship between this guy and his wife is.
3. He doesn't even know these people and probably would have a hard time even contacting the wife.
So, basically his options are either to stay out of it or tell the parents he thinks the guy is cheating.
This is not as black and white as people are acting like.
Tell her anonymously then bail. Shenanigans to come up.
(maybe float it by my dad first then my mom depending on how my dad reacts)
I'd try to talk to him, maybe understand his situation and then evaluate things from a new. If he doesn't want to be with his wife anymore he should get a divorce, if he just wants to blow off some steam he could try to find other ways to do this. If there is no reasoning with him I'd involve a third party. (someone who knows him better)I should mention that I don't know the wife at all, and even if I was convinced I should tell her, I don't know how I would even get in contact with her. At the very least without going through my cousin first. She probably wouldn't believe me anyway so the only people who I can realistically tell are my parents (maybe float it by my dad first then my mom depending on how my dad reacts)
Ah, and he wants me to add him on Facebook. I'm glad we're such good buddies now.
Because you're the only person in this frequently recurring type of thread to suggest that non-intervention is the best course?
Baby, you're so vain.
God another one of these threads of "it's not your place to tell her" cockameme bullshit. Just do it, anyone deserves to know when their spouse or SO is being a philandering shithead. If she already knows then no sweat off your back.
Indeed.
I never understand why people say it's not your place, you don't know the situation, stay out of it, etc etc.
I'm usually in the minority though.
You don't understand why people say "You don't know the situation" when the OP admits he doesn't know the situation?
You don't understand why people say "You don't know the situation" when the OP admits he doesn't know the situation?
To perceive the decrying of that position as a personal attack on you is ridiculously defensive.
So fast forward to this past Thursday when he decided to "skip" his conference.
He didn't waste any time getting to the point and straight up told me that the reason why he wanted me to take him out that night was because he had met a woman at his conference who had invited him out that night.
Apparently you don't know what question marks signify.Apparently you aren't reading the same thread I am.
Don't go injecting logic and reason where it doesn't belong. Clearly, he deserves the death penalty.You don't understand why people say "You don't know the situation" when the OP admits he doesn't know the situation?
You don't understand why people say "You don't know the situation" when the OP admits he doesn't know the situation?
I understand the "it's not your place to say anything" take on this, but the cousin decided it was the OP's place to be an accessory to the cheating. If the perp decides its your place to be an accessory, then it should go both ways, and it's also your place to be expose it.
I wasn't just talking about this thread.
There have been many other cases in the past where the situation was much more clear, yet people repeat the same thing ad nauseam.
And you know what, even in this case it's pretty clear imo. Intent is just as bad as follow through. The fact that he even wanted to meet up with this chick (and wanted to hide it from OP's parents) is morally dubious.
So anyone in a monogamous relationship who experiences temptation should, where possible, have that temptation reported to their partner?I wasn't just talking about this thread.
There have been many other cases in the past where the situation was much more clear, yet people repeat the same thing ad nauseam.
And you know what, even in this case it's pretty clear imo. Intent is just as bad as follow through. The fact that he even wanted to meet up with this chick (and wanted to hide it from OP's parents) is morally dubious.