The whole point is that this is stupid-ass Nostradamus stuff. It's vague insider teasing that literally can't be disproven. If the battery is lower or higher it'll just be "well, I guess they <managed to make things more efficient> / <didn't quite hit their battery target>". It's the very worst kind of insider teasing, and it's combined with the absolute stupidest thing: "I know more but I'm not going to say because I want you guys to enjoy the surprise!" It's the same archetype every time.
Sometimes it's because the person is a fake insider just making inferences based on publicly available info and basic rational speculation about what a good decision would be. Other times it's because they have some connection to developers (although possibly random indie developers on the periphery who themselves are not in a position to know) but they just pass along every nugget of info they hear with no discretion as to sourcing or hearsay. Does it really matter which they are? Regardless, it's annoying as hell.
These figures do it repeatedly, over and over again, week in and week out, for years and eventually people just start thinking "yeah, they sound credible, after all they're saying what other sources have saying, and I think they were definitely kinda right about something once".
Exclusive Scoop: I Am An Insider and I know the Nintendo has some exciting News for the January meeting... I won't spoil it but... it will be... legend....ary...!!!!
Wii U gamepad has:
1. Small Battery. Puny. It is only 1500mAh.
2. The video signal is a constant 5Ghz Wi-Fi transmission. Plus the Bluetooth for the controller.
Watch Netflix on your cellphone and tell me how long the battery lasts. And mind you, it has a bigger battery.
Blame the messenger, not the message then.The whole point is that this is stupid-ass Nostradamus stuff. It's vague insider teasing that literally can't be disproven. If the battery is lower or higher it'll just be "well, I guess they <managed to make things more efficient> / <didn't quite hit their battery target>". It's the very worst kind of insider teasing, and it's combined with the absolute stupidest thing: "I know more but I'm not going to say because I want you guys to enjoy the surprise!" It's the same archetype every time.
Sometimes it's because the person is a fake insider just making inferences based on publicly available info and basic rational speculation about what a good decision would be. Other times it's because they have some connection to developers (although possibly random indie developers on the periphery who themselves are not in a position to know) but they just pass along every nugget of info they hear with no discretion as to sourcing or hearsay. Does it really matter which they are? Regardless, it's annoying as hell.
These figures do it repeatedly, over and over again, week in and week out, for years and eventually people just start thinking "yeah, they sound credible, after all they're saying what other sources have saying, and I think they were definitely kinda right about something once".
Exclusive Scoop: I Am An Insider and I know the Nintendo has some exciting News for the January meeting... I won't spoil it but... it will be... legend....ary...!!!!
The whole point is that this is stupid-ass Nostradamus stuff. It's vague insider teasing that literally can't be disproven. If the battery is lower or higher it'll just be "well, I guess they <managed to make things more efficient> / <didn't quite hit their battery target>". It's the very worst kind of insider teasing, and it's combined with the absolute stupidest thing: "I know more but I'm not going to say because I want you guys to enjoy the surprise!" It's the same archetype every time.
Sometimes it's because the person is a fake insider just making inferences based on publicly available info and basic rational speculation about what a good decision would be. Other times it's because they have some connection to developers (although possibly random indie developers on the periphery who themselves are not in a position to know) but they just pass along every nugget of info they hear with no discretion as to sourcing or hearsay. Does it really matter which they are? Regardless, it's annoying as hell.
These figures do it repeatedly, over and over again, week in and week out, for years and eventually people just start thinking "yeah, they sound credible, after all they're saying what other sources have saying, and I think they were definitely kinda right about something once".
Exclusive Scoop: I Am An Insider and I know the Nintendo has some exciting News for the January meeting... I won't spoil it but... it will be... legend....ary...!!!!
I believe the Wii U game pad actually just does both over 5GHz WiFi. No Bluetooth.
No bullet point was given on this though.Expect less. Battery life is always something that is always given at the most perfect ideal situation in a bullet point.
Lmao(Unless you're Elena, then he probably lied to you)
I've been playing the shit out of Monster Hunter on my N3DS XL and I'm sure as hell I've never gotten 5 hrs battery out of it.
""devkits being shiped""""
no shit
"""""should be 5-8 hours""""
yep this sure is real good scoops, really laying it all on the line there, no possible way to weasel out of this if it's wrong because it's just a random guess
""""""" i don't like ruining the surprises of what they're going to announce """"
yeah maybe because you don't know any????
The whole point is that this is stupid-ass Nostradamus stuff. It's vague insider teasing that literally can't be disproven. If the battery is lower or higher it'll just be "well, I guess they <managed to make things more efficient> / <didn't quite hit their battery target>". It's the very worst kind of insider teasing, and it's combined with the absolute stupidest thing: "I know more but I'm not going to say because I want you guys to enjoy the surprise!" It's the same archetype every time.
Sometimes it's because the person is a fake insider just making inferences based on publicly available info and basic rational speculation about what a good decision would be. Other times it's because they have some connection to developers (although possibly random indie developers on the periphery who themselves are not in a position to know) but they just pass along every nugget of info they hear with no discretion as to sourcing or hearsay. Does it really matter which they are? Regardless, it's annoying as hell.
These figures do it repeatedly, over and over again, week in and week out, for years and eventually people just start thinking "yeah, they sound credible, after all they're saying what other sources have saying, and I think they were definitely kinda right about something once".
Exclusive Scoop: I Am An Insider and I know the Nintendo has some exciting News for the January meeting... I won't spoil it but... it will be... legend....ary...!!!!
I'm sure it is. The shield tablet gets under 3 during graphics benchmarks.I think that battery life is too good to be true, honestly
Also, 5-8 hours on 3DS? Ahahahahahhah
What about him saying it's Pascal-based? That seems harder to dodge if he's wrong. I know the other thread about the supposed dev kit leak mentioned Maxwell which is the older architecture before Pascal right? So Switch using Pascal would be awesome since it's the latest (I think Volta is the upcoming one next year after Pascal).
Do you believe this claim?
Why are you mad?
Aren't you a mod? Why don't you verify his sources?
What 3DS is 5-8 hours? I am lucky to get three with my New 3DS XL.
Oh dear oh dear. Maybe you should have actually found out who NateDrake is before going on this bizarre rant?
I can't imagine 5-8 at all, not even a bunch of tablets I have ow ed over the years hit that when active, the only time I have had tablets last that long is video playback at medium brightness. iPad has good life but again playing a game or intense cpu app kills the battery twice as fast.
I'm keeping it safe and expecting much less.
The whole point is that this is stupid-ass Nostradamus stuff. It's vague insider teasing that literally can't be disproven. If the battery is lower or higher it'll just be "well, I guess they <managed to make things more efficient> / <didn't quite hit their battery target>". It's the very worst kind of insider teasing, and it's combined with the absolute stupidest thing: "I know more but I'm not going to say because I want you guys to enjoy the surprise!" It's the same archetype every time.
Sometimes it's because the person is a fake insider just making inferences based on publicly available info and basic rational speculation about what a good decision would be. Other times it's because they have some connection to developers (although possibly random indie developers on the periphery who themselves are not in a position to know) but they just pass along every nugget of info they hear with no discretion as to sourcing or hearsay. Does it really matter which they are? Regardless, it's annoying as hell.
These figures do it repeatedly, over and over again, week in and week out, for years and eventually people just start thinking "yeah, they sound credible, after all they're saying what other sources have saying, and I think they were definitely kinda right about something once".
Exclusive Scoop: I Am An Insider and I know the Nintendo has some exciting News for the January meeting... I won't spoil it but... it will be... legend....ary...!!!!
He's Stumpokapow. He's a moderator. He knows who NateDrake is. That's partially why he's ranting. He's had enough of unsubstantiated Switch rumors.
He's Stumpokapow. He's a moderator. He knows who NateDrake is. That's partially why he's ranting. He's had enough of unsubstantiated Switch rumors.
What 3DS is 5-8 hours? I am lucky to get three with my New 3DS XL.
I don't have a clue who NateDrake is besides a character from Uncharted and apparently a Youtuber?
I don't have a clue who NateDrake is besides a character from Uncharted and apparently a Youtuber?
""devkits being shiped""""
no shit
"""""should be 5-8 hours""""
yep this sure is real good scoops, really laying it all on the line there, no possible way to weasel out of this if it's wrong because it's just a random guess
""""""" i don't like ruining the surprises of what they're going to announce """"
yeah maybe because you don't know any????
I don't fully know how the newer tech works for charging but my Nexus 6p over a fully powered USB c takes about 75 minutes from flat to reach 100%,i forget the battery size but hopefully the switch has something beefy in there.USB C means it'll probably take 30 minutes to recharge.
I don't have a clue who NateDrake is besides a character from Uncharted and apparently a Youtuber?
It's a good thing Nate didn't make the thread or even make a big deal about it in his very short video then.It is getting a little tiring, frankly.
I know mods shy away from mega threads in favor of "new news, new thread", but we don't even know if this stuff is actual news.