Mike M: Ive had this notion of a time travel experiment where they broadcast an image back in time that cant be deciphered until they broadcast it back to themselves in the past rattling around in my head for a while. But while its a neat thing to think about, its not really a story on its own, so I tried to do something where it was the framing device for this character story thing with themes and shit.
Not gonna lie, I had hoped it would be better received.
I knew it could be better, but I was still harboring hope that maybe I was being too hard on myself. It was twice as long as usual and work conspired to allot me only half the time to edit it, but even with all other concerns being equal, I dont know how much better I could have done. The most frustrating thing for me is the adage of if you want to get better at writing books, write more books/if you want to get better at writing short stories, write more short stories, has been looming over my head as I accumulate rejection letters for short story submissions like collectible trading cards. Ive gotten pretty okay at that ~2-2.5K range (though not enough to be published, apparently), but my mid and long game are deficient and I am becoming ever increasingly aware that I dont have the time to polish it up while also staying involved in these. And if I stop with these, I have a real fear that Id just stop entirely. Work has really amped my stress levels up an order of magnitude lately, so Im just a bundle of raw nerves feeling the burn at every form rejection and every post of someone elses success in the writing OT.
Dandy Crocodile: This one didnt just feel like a character sketch, so kudos on that. You also made the protagonist intensely, achingly unlikable, and Im not sure how successful that is for me, though at least we got the satisfaction of him getting his comeuppance at the end. I felt that Dan was inconsistent in a multitude of areas, however; the detail about Dan testing into calculus in particular was stumbling block for me. That one note paints him as an overachieving All-American Boy, but the rest of the story shows that he is really nothing but a delusional misogynist of questionable intellect. Also, he didnt know what he was going to do, but came prepared for and executed a clearly preconceived plan (yet he didnt think to cut the rope ahead of time?)? But then somehow his plan to scare her wasnt going to plan when he succeeded in scaring her? What exactly was he hoping to achieve with all that? Everything about the cut on his leg being testimony to him already having done something to Jessie was reeeeally rough to me. The first we explicitly hear about it is when hes leaving a blood trail through the house, where its kind of an off-hand remark in a and oh yeah, he was bleeding from his leg and I guess it was kinda bad sort of way, and then we just drop the bomb that
something
happened at Jessies house that resulted in a cut on his shin, but we honestly dont know what that was and its frankly difficult to imagine what it would have been. Did he kill Jessie? In a way where he sustained a cut on his shin but had no other signs of blood on him from, say, the victim? Did he kill everyone in the house? Idunno, it seemed like this was supposed to live or die by the gradual revelation of the extent of Dans plans/previous actions that night, and it wasnt handled as deftly as it could have been.
Chartreuse: Clearly the solution is to take off again, set the car back down wherever you put the wings on in the first place, and install a ladder. Personally I would just suck it up and find the nearest pay lot, but Im lazy like that.
Tangent: Man, there seems to be a rash of DNF entries lately. This one seemed an odd mix of fantastical elements coupled with a rather modern-day interpretation of higher learning, complete with the concepts of weekends and finals week. It kept leading me to think that it was going to be some variety of magical realism/urban fantasy or something, but then theyre all sitting on cushions and they travel around with bladders of spring water, which evokes a more high fantasy vibe. I think I would have actually liked to have seen some gremlins and seen how their powers could be beneficial, or even what sort of powers you would have ascribed to them. Theyre traditionally associated with a vague notion of anti-technology powers in my experience, which seems a bit at odds with the demonstrated level of development in the world (which may play a part in my instinct to view this as a magical realism story). I also wasnt super crazy on the notion of the most powerful object in the land being an icicle of all things, even less so the notion that if it were so powerful it would not be under heavy guard, apparently be relatively easily removed, and just melt away as would conventional ice. Also, the less heard about helping people with their digestive troubles, the better. Ew.
FlowersisBritish: I liked this one a lot, felt that it fit into a slot somewhere between Dirk Gently and Constantine. I especially enjoyed that the demon was, at first blush, not an especially horrible creature who seemed to actually care somewhat for the welfare of Harry and his missing shoes. There seemed to be a few details that were mentioned in passing that seemed almost contradictory and caused me to trip up over myself as I went along, however. How do those with the gift of premonition lead uneventful lives? Is the implication that they know all the bad things happening and avoid them, but somehow never get the urge to abuse their powers at a casino, for instance? Harrys patience is called out as being particularly noteworthy, but its after he just asked Babel to stop bitching. People who use the word bitching in such a context arent demonstrating any real degree of patience, in my experience. Also not entirely sure why Babel is hustling people by working a scam when he possesses genuine powers and abilities. I can certainly think of reasons why that may be (how often does an exorcism come along versus someone wanting their fortune told?), but theyre not addressed. The only total misfire for me was the description of the astral plane fight or whatever. It just
didnt do anything for me at all. Id have rather had practically anything else or nothing at all, and had the spare words spent developing the demon and exploring that aside from being lazy and debaucherous, hes not especially evil.
Cyan: Man, the boardroom farce seems something out of a bygone era these days. The head-hopping kind of threw me for a moment, as at first by all indications Gable was supposed to be the protagonist, but then we jumped to Adams almost immediately and stayed there for the majority of it. I think perhaps too much time was spent with the stop shouting gag, which just got turned around and used again on Gable. I liked the part about shipping off the fired guys desk to help Nepal, and I think the story could have benefited from more things like that rather than generally talking in circles about how they were going to help without actually throwing out ridiculous stuff like sending the desk. It kind of jumped the shark for me when Adams ordered someone to take Gable outside and rough him up; at that point we went from a room full of people with imposter syndrome trying to avoid as much work as possible without threatening their jobs to a senile old man yelling at clouds. In stripping the last vestiges of already strained believability, it went more into the realm of a spoof movie, but was only there for a couple jokes rather than committed fully. In summary: Comedy is hard.
Ashes: You almost literally wrote a story about paint drying, heh. This was kind of an unusual read from you as you usually do very character heavy pieces, but this was almost completely devoid of it outside of a brief conversation about painting a room white. It read like a recitation of events in order rather than a narrative, and nothing happened. I may very well be missing some deeper truth about humanity or something, but Im just superficial like that.
Neener: I realize you have a wildly speculative world here, but man, that exposition dump... Not sure how you would have been better able to show instead of tell, especially with the word count limit, but that seems like something you should take up with Nezumi : P. I was kind of bothered the whole time that her designated function was mater when really everything she seemed to be into would be better described as being a caretaker for the buds, not
providing the genetic raw material to produce them. That ending though, that was a brutal gut punch out of nowhere. Fatherhood has ruined me.
Nezumi: This reminds me of
I want to say a scene from Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon where theres a short conversation about how one of the characters achieved such a state of nihilism but hadnt felt any of the joy of enlightenment or something? Something like that. Its been a while since I slept through took Zen Buddhism in college, but from what I recall I dont think just being mindful of the sensations of the walk back would count as enlightenment? Idunno, Im just talking about my ass here.
Bootaaay: I mostly liked this, even though you jump from present to past tense after a few paragraphs. I liked what little of the magic system we got to see with the rubbing of the two coins together, but I also think we needed an explanation about why Caspians magic would have no effect on Boar while the trap magic of the seal clearly did. That said, there was a good sense of pacing and action, an interesting magic system, and a theme of the contrast between light and darkness. The fact that you were able to cram that much into a short amount of time is remarkable, though if anything it is perhaps a bit overly breezy in its narration as we rush from the establishing scene to the conclusion in the space of a few pages.
Votes:
1.) FlowersisBritish
2.) Bootaaay
3.) Cyan