Technically a not insignificant portion of the members here have in fact made a game (and in some cases several)
Not knowing how to do/make something =/= we can't give our opinion. When a bridge breaks down can nobody complain because we don't know how to build bridges?
In terms of demands of older games to be rereleased and localizations, yes.
In terms of feedback regarding the next game, partially. Take some but not all to strike up innovation and at the same time fix the issues that the fans had.
FixedSquare Enix reads NeoGAF to determine what gamers want, and we still get a lot of mobile games?
Lower then? I may have been too generous.
GAF has less than 150K registered users. We are a drop in the bucket.
Extensive play testing by 13-34 males and mock reviews are what matters in big money games. As Druckman said, don't listen to neogaf.
I'd have to estimate NeoGAF makes up around 10-15% of the overall gaming community of the world.
That analogy doesn't make sense.
Ahh, that puts things into perspective then. I thought we were bigger than that.
I can't tell if this is negative or not, wouldn't we have a new Metroid game? lol
That's just selective memory of you guys.Well, they already do read GAF. And Nate Bihldorff commented in the the old Brawl thread long ago. Who knows what they could be listening or looking for.
My question is: should developers take this site (and sites like it) into account when building a game? I imagine a lot of them do and that some of them are actually active contributors.
But are we merely a small, idealist cross section of gamers or do we actually represent the mass market of people who purchase video games?
I realize that we carry more weight with a small indie developer making a hardcore 2D platformer than Activision while making the next Call of Duty Halo Explosion 12, but should that change?
That's just selective memory of you guys.
If Nintendo (NCL) actually listened to NeoGAF they'd be releasing their games on iOS and PS4 instead of doing it on their own platforms.
vocal minority: neogaf
important voice: pewdiepie
vocal minority: neogaf
important voice: pewdiepie
ouchTruth hurts.
It's definitely more on the vocal minority side of things as far as mass-market releases are concerned; that's especially obvious when you compare the site's general rabid, unconditional love of everything excreted by Nintendo to the general public's apathy.
But it probably would serve as a reasonable barometer for smaller releases, particularly when tailoring the pitch of a kickstarted game to a particular enthusiast audience.
should developers take this site (and sites like it) into account when building a game?
But are we merely a small, idealist cross section of gamers or do we actually represent the mass market of people who purchase video games?
NeoGAF is not as influential as you think.
If that's real, it makes me weep for our industry.
If that's not real, then it makes me laugh.
If that's real, it makes me weep for our industry.
If that's not real, then it makes me laugh.
It probably was a while ago, before the advent of places like Reddit.
Reddit is usually met with a symphony of groaning on here, but the gaming audience there is massive. Even Gabe posts there!