Because you didn't spend time or effort you just made a pointless rant they went around in circles showing you didn't even try to do any research and if you did you just went on google and spend 2 minutes on it if that.
The fact you decided to come back just to try and stroke your ego doesn't help your case at all and it's clear that you and some others are obsessively defending children being put in situations they shouldn't be in. There's nothing more to talk about other than it's disgusting and sad.
You didn't even tag me, just tried to be a slick little cunt on the slide thinking you would get away with it. Shows you have no case.
None of you or your other defenders are even making an argument you keep ignoring people pointing out the issues and then you move the goal posts to "know sex scenes" which wasn't the concern or "companies are making money" yet I bet you there are shows you don't support where that excuse doesn't work so why would it work here?
Something is wrong with you, hope you get it cleared up soon.
My dear, dear fellow Forum Poster
Afro Republican
.
(Post in question, for reference, I'd suggest you re-read it: https://www.neogaf.com/threads/netf...ueen-and-underaged-kid.1520064/post-256566465)
I broke down your thread as simply as possible, to make it easy to follow along with. Each numbered point covered a different part of your OP, and how you were factually and purposefully wrong, about, well, everything. If the rant was "pointless" you should have no issues debating my *3* numbered points. I also, rather painstakingly, explained my research, which in fact did take longer than 2 minutes, though I was not keeping a counter running the whole time.
If you wanted to post an OPINION thread about Children palling around with Drag Queens, sure, go ahead. I'd probably even agree with you. But you didn't, you posted specifically (and very incorrectly) about a show you know nothing about, and refused to concede that fact. You pass your opinions off as truth and fact, which isn't great to begin with, but is actively harmful when you've been proven to be 100% incorrect.
"Stroke my ego"? What does that even mean in this context? Proving you're wrong, and have hate in your heart doesn't prove me right, or better than you, it just shines a light on whatever is wrong with your state of mind at the moment.
"You didn't even tag me" is another great one from
Afro Republican
. I quoted your OP
*&* tagged you
*4* times in my post. Please review the original post, and no, I didn't sneak back in to edit it, this is verifiable by the edit timestamp of Wednesday 1/15/2020. Why would I post, however many words that was, and NOT tag you. "Thinking I would get away with it"? With WHAT? Literally WHAT? I was addressing
YOU PERSONALLY. I was asking you to fight and defend the points YOU (
Afro Republican
) posted in YOUR (
Afro Republican
) OP. So, since your sentence was now absolutely proven to be false, does that prove I do, in fact, have a case?
"None of you or your other defenders are even making an argument you keep ignoring people pointing out the issues and then you move the goal posts to "know sex scenes" which wasn't the concern or "companies are making money" yet I bet you there are shows you don't support where that excuse doesn't work so why would it work here?"
Just... what? Do you even read what you write after you've typed it? I honestly am going over the above words over and over again trying to make sense of it. Let's try.
#1. "None of you or your other defenders are even making an argument"
I am pretty certain I laid out my argument in my (long, detailed) post. I'll restate, as simply as I can:
Your OP is wrong, and you should feel bad. Nothing you posted in the OP is true, and really that kind of OP shouldn't be allowed on NeoGAF. I then went into detail, line by line, how you're OP is wrong/bad/etc. I more than welcome you to refute any of my findings, and would be more than happy to retract or recant my words if proven wrong. This is your time,
Afro Republican
, this is your moment to shine. Don't deflect when you can be a star!
As for the others, they have made their argument, and while I touched on it as well, it is their argument to defend. The show does not sexualize children to any extent worse than any other adult TV show featuring child actors.
#2. "
you keep ignoring people pointing out the issues and then you move the goal posts to "know sex scenes" which wasn't the concern or "companies are making money" yet I bet you there are shows you don't support where that excuse doesn't work so why would it work here?"
Parsing this one is a little rough. I don't think anyone (outside of you, tagged
Afro Republican
) is ignoring people. We don't see eye to eye, but that is not ignoring the issue. You have been ignoring people who have watched the whole season, telling you there isn't anything bad in here, and just instead going with, what I assume is, your gut, and saying the show is awful. The goal posts were (and still are) from your OP: The show was funded by questionable organizations and the show was being pushed in the kids section (from what you "heard"). You've so-far refused to name these nefarious "questionable organizations" nor provide any kind of proof that the show is being marketed towards kids (nor it being renewed for a 2nd season...). Kick a ball through the goal posts you, yourself setup first
Afro Republican
!
I don't even know where you're going with the "companies making money bit" or shows I don't support, so I can't address those, I do apologize. If you could clarify, I'd be happy to take a whack at it.
Something is wrong with you, hope you get it cleared up soon.
Uhh, I'm rubber, you're glue, whatever you say bounces off me and sticks to you.
To be real for a moment, and since NeoGAF is growing/expanding again, I'd like to ask
EviLore
what the rules are for truth in Off-Topic topics. I checked the FAQ and it was not immediately clear. Are members allowed to post new threads with completely fabricated details passed as fact? That is the crux of my argument here, as I think
Afro Republican
should be free to hate Trans/Sexual/Vestite/Gender/etc as much as he wants, but he should not be letting his own internalized hatred result in posting topics that are completely & factually incorrect. (See post
#72 for breakdown of how/why this OP is completely wrong, possibly in a malicious way.) This seems like it would be a bad precedent to set, as anyone could purposefully shitpost, thus putting the burden on verifying it on other posters/mods/admins.