themagicalkitsune
Member
Another Mother imo
Mother: Other M
Another Mother imo
Not if they also lifted the sprites and possibly the battle system which may well be copyrighted or patented.
Because it's not Mother 4. It's a fanmade RPG heavily inspired by the Mother franchise.
Calling it "Mother 4" gives it an aura of authenticity - and if it comes out like this, you WILL see people who think it's an official game because of the name.
Plus, if Nintendo ever does make an actual Mother 4, this will be even more confusing.
Just call it "Blah: A Mother Fangame" or something
Haha, ah shit, amazing.He's making a satirical post based on this thread.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=995810
I don't know how to feel about this. On one hand I think it's really disrespectful to call it Mother 4 but on the other hand I'm interested to see what they've come up with.
Not if they also lifted the sprites and possibly the battle system which may well be copyrighted or patented.
Anybody planning on making a post about the possibility of a C&D, we and the development team are well aware of the risk. The Dev Team already seem to have a plan for what they would do if a C&D is issued. They would remove anything Mother-related, and make it an original generic RPG. If you have anymore questions, feel free to ask.
UPDATE (11/17/14): Nintendo has announced that they are letting people use their IP's for fan projects with no legal repercussions. This means Mother 4 is completely in the clear in terms of Cease and Desists. THERE IS NO POSSIBILITY OF CEASE AND DESIST NOW.
Thank you for reading.
To be fair, we would be as critical if some dudes off the internet made a vid claiming that they're making the sequel to Romancing Saga 3, Half Life 3 or Portal 3 without any authorization.Wow, people here seem really critical. I'd hate to see what would be said about actual bad looking fan games lol.
But fans want Mother 4, as Itoi himself wants if you read his quote above.Plus, if Nintendo ever does make an actual Mother 4, this will be even more confusing.
Just call it "Blah: A Mother Fangame" or something
http://earthboundcentral.com/2011/04/shigesato-itoi-discusses-mother-4/
SHIGESATO ITOI: The feeling of, “I want a MOTHER 4 to be released!” is inside me, too. Even if it’s not something I need to do, I still feel that way. Still, there isn’t someone for me to watch over from afar anymore. If there were a fourth game, I’d want to be the player.
NAGATA: In other words, you wouldnÂ’t mind if someone other than yourself made it?
ITOI: Right. For example, when I watch a good stage play, that’s MOTHER 4. Even if they never intended it to be that way. When I say, “I can’t get enough of this dialog!” you could even say that I, as a “player”, am finishing the world the writer built. Just as everyone finished the MOTHER games for me. So it’d be great if there were such “games” everywhere. They don’t even need to be games, though. If someone wanted to play it in game form, then go right ahead. If someone started making something like “Chimidoro-numa Strikes Back” (translation note: MOTHER 2’s subtitle was Giygas Strikes Back) and you could basically say, “This is clearly MOTHER 4, however you look at it,” who knows, I might just say, “In that case, why don’t you stick a red cap on him and give him a backpack?”
You cant patent artstyle, and if the battle system was the case, enix would like to have some words with itoi first, as it was lifted directly from Dragon Quest.
They didnt lift any sprites, they only used the EXACT same artstyle to create different characters and scenarios.
To be fair, we would be as critical if some dudes off the internet made a vid claiming that they're making the sequel to Romancing Saga 3, Half Life 3 or Portal 3 without any authorization.
Heck you should have seen the uproar when someone in the 90's tried to sell the "sequel" of Les Misérables in France.
You can make a fan project but don't try to pass yourself for the real deal.
Yeah, then it could be put on the eShop or Steam.
Because it's not Mother 4. It's a fanmade RPG heavily inspired by the Mother franchise.
Calling it "Mother 4" gives it an aura of authenticity - and if it comes out like this, you WILL see people who think it's an official game because of the name.
Plus, if Nintendo ever does make an actual Mother 4, this will be even more confusing.
Just call it "Blah: A Mother Fangame" or something
Nobody will confuse it for an official Mother game, because it will be available outside Japan.
:-(
That level up music, omg...
To be fair, we would be as critical if some dudes off the internet made a vid claiming that they're making the sequel to Romancing Saga 3, Half Life 3 or Portal 3 without any authorization.
Heck you should have seen the uproar when someone in the 90's tried to sell the "sequel" of Les Misérables in France.
You can make a fan project but don't try to pass yourself for the real deal.
Nobody will confuse it for an official Mother game, because it will be available outside Japan.
:-(
Eh I don't know how I feel about this, I mean I loved Earthbound and Mother 3, but those games were so good mainly because of Itoi, and this game obviously doesn't have that.
Not to mention there's the fact that Nintendo may very well shut their project down, I don't understand why they had to call it Mother 4, they should have given it a different name.
Its clear from the artstyle alone that it would basically be a spiritual sequel to Mother 3.
...But they are not? They are clearly indicating its Fan made.
And you think people weren't aware that Victor Hugo was long dead when a talentless hack tried to make a controversial sequel?
At least here the makers' intentions are far more pure.
I don't get the point of this comparison?
The current case of Mother 4 is really a special case, but the 1rst thing I thought was the hack trying to write sequels of 'Les Misérables'.Because it's not Mother 4. It's a fanmade RPG heavily inspired by the Mother franchise.
Calling it "Mother 4" gives it an aura of authenticity - and if it comes out like this, you WILL see people who think it's an official game because of the name.
Plus, if Nintendo ever does make an actual Mother 4, this will be even more confusing.
Just call it "Blah: A Mother Fangame" or something
The current case of Mother 4 is really a special case, but the 1rst thing I thought was the hack trying to write sequels of 'Les Misérables'.
You know one of the most famous jewel of French literature?
I mean then why even complain in this case? It's clear the creator has no issues with this and even encourages it, the people behind the project obviously care about the IP and are deeply invested and it looks very professional, I honestly don't understand the complains about the name, so I guess I will stop arguing it.
It still really rubs me the wrong way... When the creator of Mother said 3 was the end and he didn't want to do any more... it's kind of insulting to go "I disagree, I'm going to take your vision, call it a sequel with no input from you, and screw you for not doing this yourself."
Just my thought.
Just my thought.
I have a problem with giving the sole credit of Mother to Itoi while forgetting the teams that did the brunt of the work.
I mean Mother 3 wouldn't be what it is without the people of the now defunct Br².
I think the only info we have from IP owners in this case is that they support fanmade projects as long as they don't try to make money of it.
And looking at the project I don't think it could have fallen in better hands, it's still something with a real lost potential to it.
It still really rubs me the wrong way... When the creator of Mother said 3 was the end and he didn't want to do any more... it's kind of insulting to go "I disagree, I'm going to take your vision, call it a sequel with no input from you, and screw you for not doing this yourself."
Just my thought.
I mean I would be more sympathetic to your view if it didn't seem like it was completely done out of utter reverence for the series.
And for free.
Well that is true, but then at that point it becomes sort of pointless to discuss because we can't ever tell what everyone wants. I highly doubt all the people behind a single project have both the same opinions and wishes regarding how they want the series to be handled in the future.
I don't see the issue with calling it MOTHER 4 since Itoi himself said he has no interest in making another MOTHER game. Hell, if this DOES get C&D'd it would be awfully classless for the same reason. Copyright exists to protect the rights of a concept owner and let them profit off of their idea, and if the owner themself says they don't want to make any more, well...
It seems a little conceited. Unless Itoi himself nominated this group to carry on his legacy, it seems pretty presumptuous to try to add things to a series' canon on your own initiative.
Who knows, in the future Itoi and Nintendo might decide to change their mind and develop a Mother 4 themselves. His future with the series isn't written in stone. Then what's this project going to call itself?
I don't have much issue with them having Mother in the game's title, but calling it "Mother 4" seems a bit much.