Except the tablets i suggest in my op are all pretty good with regards to all of those and the windows version is a really good all-around.
None of your posts are helpful to the discussion at hand, though.
I'm trying to explain how to pick a tablet, I feel you actually know what you want and are at that stage where you are arguing yourself to it which is cool and I'll likely not influence you past this point but the tablet market it tricky and full of marketing and I'd like to be as informative as I can not just for you but anyone else in this thread.
Mainly my earlier posts were counter-pointing ideas about Win8 tablets. I understand the allure of Win8 tablets but at this point they just aren't very good unless you very specifically want something that only it can do. In most cases this turns out to be "run Steam" or "run Office" which I'd argue is less interesting than it sounds because it compromises the most important point of a tablet which is high portability. When you start needing a stand/gamepad/keyboard/mouse or whatever this not only adds to the cost but it's no longer portable because you're hauling too much around and at that point an ultrabook is just a better option.
But in terms of hardware they generally pale in terms of the competition and the thing about the tablet market it hardware and OS are inseparably linked and most tablets of a specific OS will share a number of features. I'm not a fan of Win8 offerings in the current market.
It's not okay to have a sub 1080p screen or really even a 1080p screen at 10". You can't bow out of the resolution race until you're hitting somewhere around 250 PPI. Most of these won't even mention viewing angles or color accuracy because even though they are post PPI measures of how good a screen is they know it's an area they can cheap out on.
It's not okay to weight 50% more than your competition or have giant bezels. Many of these weigh somewhere around 1.5lbs. The competition is mostly under 1lb. And while build quality in tablets is skyrocketing most of these look to be cheaping out here too hoping people don't notice that they are pretty hefty in comparison and certainly most don't have good build quality track records in the PC market either.
It's not okay to be getting 2 hours less battery than the competition in your preferential lab tested spec-sheet that certainly wasn't accounting for background tasks like Chrome and Steam. Tablets are optimized to go all day, even multiple days with sleeping. 8 hours is nothing when the competition is topping out around 12.
I do think it's great they universally seem to start at 32GB and have SD card support but that's also because Win8 can't fit in 16GB. Though for raw storage of media this could very well be a big plus.
Much of this is why WinRT is a thing. Intel chips are still fairly power hungry, Bay Trial has crappy graphics performance (its great if you're encoding video on your tablet though), Win8 can't intelligently manage desktop apps and services and those apps certainly were not designed to respect battery life. It's this reason why within Windows I'd recommend the Surface 2 or Lumina 2520 over them, they are much better at being tablets. Perhaps the sole outlier is the Surface Pro which is less a tablet and more a category all to itself.
So when we talk about tablet gaming I'd argue the correct thing to do is think about what mobile games you like because if you're thinking Steam to use that much extra equipment you likely won't do it in the long run and just for novelty. It's the same thing to ask if you have a gaming laptop do you take it with you everywhere? I'm guessing no because it's a behemoth. But that's what a tablet is designed to do, you keep in in your bag all the time. If you're going to make it more annoying for yourself you won't take it or you'll take less of the accessory stuff at which point you should have gotten the better tablet.
