MomoPufflet
Member
I guess Capcom should reconsider the sequel's working title: RE6: The Jerusalem Outbreak.
NameIess said:This thread is proof that most people are not prepared to have an adult conversation regarding race...
I agree the footage displayed too date is not offensive, but the overall theme and location of the game could be a powder keg if not handled properly
It's less provocative to use a location and people who have overcome historical atrocities, but African nations are still dealing with genocide and disease epidemics so the locale may not be the best based on the current social & political climate IMO.
The game just has a great risk of being viewed as socially insensitive and could pose problems for Capcom. That's my 2 cents...
*I can see the youtube music videos now...*
Flavius said:If that one pissed you off, how about this one: you're a former Iraqi civilian whose entire family has been killed and you blame the United States for your loss. You join up with Al Qaeda and take your fight to American soil, murdering men, women, and children. Suddenly, you are overcome with grief and realize the errors of your ways, returning to Iraq with a new found sense of purpose: taking down Al Qaeda from within.
You're pissed because you don't understand. It isn't an analogy, per se. I'm not implying that RE5 is a similar game, in any way, shape, form, or fashion. My point is that some of you (including some of those currently promoting or working on this title) need to get a fucking clue and take others' thoughts and feelings into consideration.
woxel1 said:I don't think I need to connect the dots for you any further. Obviously, you can't read for racism. Whether that's a good thing or not isn't for me to decide.
Personally i am more concerned with the realistic portrayal of the locale rather than is it racist or not.Doc Evils said:But it's ok for other games?
I raise youoo Kosma oo said:Oh sorry thats just a reality check for those thinking these things can be compared.
Because people are so desensitized to colonialism and white dominance of black people that it doesn't seem anything out of the ordinary until you put the situation in the light of another group of people who have been shat on throughout history.Jtwo said:Why are people trying to put this in the context of a different race?
Dali said:Because people are so desensitized to colonialism and white dominance of black people that it doesn't seem anything out of the ordinary until you put the situation in the light of another group of people who have been shat on throughout history.
CassidyIzABeast said:Wtf at the tyler perry comment???
MC Safety said:No offense, but at some point an artistic statement can't be about others' thoughts and feelings.
At the end of it all, someone's going to be offended. And I'd rather you take a stand against Resident Evil with your dollars than Capcom bowdlerizing and sanitizing its game until no one could possibly take issue with anything in it.
VeritasVierge said:I raise you
VeritasVierge said:I know they are only illustrations since quality cameras weren't in abundance back then but they will just have to do. But what those people endured is not so bad in retrospect, right?
It is, yours was 90X130Jtwo said:It's 90x120.
Is that not the size?
Absinthe said:Fuck this thread with an iron pipe. I thought he was smarter than this, but obviously I was completely wrong.
The topic we were discussing is "racist imagery". Or did you jus learn to read yesterday?Spirit of Jazz said:So RE5 is taking place in 1800s right?
Flavius said:And I hope you don't take offense, but for someone who works in the industry, you're as bad as many of the other posters in this very thread. If you actually read the quotes and links in the OP's post, you'll see that this isn't about sanitizing the game at all. That's a question to be addressed when we actually know the content of the game in question, and not the basis for N'Gai's criticism (nor my own).
THAT'S A GREAT QUESTION, I TOO WOULD LIKE AN ANSWERMr. Spinnington said:SO WHOSE FACE IS THAT AT THE END OF THE TRAILER, I SERIOUSLY DON'T KNOW
Read above. Besides I posted those pictures for a poster who wanted to talk about "comparisons" in a thread about offensive imagery or at least imagery that can be construed wrrngly when taken out of context. Hence the RE5 trailer.Lostconfused said:Are we heading into a direction of the analogy of Chris dealing in the flesh trade to make some cash on the side?
VeritasVierge said:The topic we were discussing is "racist imagery". Or did you jus learn to read yesterday?
You figure out how it relates to the topic.
VeritasVierge said:Read above. Besides I posted those pictures for a poster who wanted to talk about "comparisons" in a thread about offensive imagery or at least can be construed worngly when taken out of context. Hence the RE5 trailer.
VeritasVierge said:I raise you
I know they are only illustrations since quality cameras weren't in abundance back then but they will just have to do. But what those people endured is not so bad in retrospect, right?
NameIess said:I believe a few people here understand your point, but refuse to give it any real consideration. I'm done with this thread, because nothing good will come from this thread.
Anasui Kishibe said:killing zombies doesn't seem out of the ordinary when it's RE
plus, you're not killing slaves in West Virginia in the year 1770. You're killing free guys in a free territory (well, relatively)
Flavius said:And I hope you don't take offense, but for someone who works in the industry, you're as bad as many of the other posters in this very thread. If you actually read the quotes and links in the OP's post, you'll see that this isn't about sanitizing the game at all. That's a question to be addressed when we actually know the content of the game in question, and not the basis for N'Gai's criticism (nor my own).
LOL. No shit but you clearly haven't been reading most of the responses in this thread. Some of the imagery in the trailer invokes these images to some people whether it's wrong or right.Lostconfused said:Imagery implies that it might be construed as racist or there is some racist undertone beneath. Slavery and denial of basic human rights isn't really imagery.
Lostconfused said:Imagery implies that it might be construed as racist or there is some racist undertone beneath. Slavery and denial of basic human rights isn't really imagery.
weird, it showed 90X130 on FFJtwo said:![]()
*head explodes*
VeritasVierge said:The topic we were discussing is "racist imagery". Or did you jus learn to read yesterday?
You figure out how it relates to the topic.
Where the fuck was Redfield in those Holocaust pictures posted a page back?JDSN said:Where is Chris Redfield in those pics?
How does it not work? He posted them to get a reaction since the pictures are proof of how terribly the Jews suffered and why the pics offend. He just refuses to accept that some of what was in the RE5 trailer will invoke such feelings in others. Someone also kept asking for "offensive" imagery from the 1920s or whatever time span it was.Spirit of Jazz said:I believe the original Austwich pictures were posted in regards to the suggestion that this is no better than a game taking place in that place and period. Hence you refuting the post with irrelevantly images doesn't exactly work too well.
The fact is there's nothing to associate those images to the RE5 trailer other than the fact that they both depict blacks being attacked. By this logic any art that depicts a black group of people being assaulted by any other racial group no matter the context is immoral and should be censored.
VeritasVierge said:The topic we were discussing is "racist imagery". Or did you jus learn to read yesterday?
You figure out how it relates to the topic.
so wait, it was ok? cause the new one looks really fuzzyiby.h said:weird, it showed 90X130 on FF
In fact, it shows at 90x135 on mine.iby.h said:weird, it showed 90X130 on FF
Resize your width to 90. Anything below 90 width will be scaled up along with the height.Jtwo said:so wait, it was ok? cause the new one looks really fuzzy
ok, the new one is like 70x105
but FF shows it as 90x135!
VeritasVierge said:LOL. No shit but you clearly haven't been reading most of the responses in this thread. Some of the imagery in the trailer invokes these images to some people whether it's wrong or right.
Rorschach said:Resize your width to 90. Anything below 90 width will be scaled up along with the height.
Who? The hispanic looking dude? with the axe?Mr. Spinnington said:; p
journalist gets panties in a knot, message board goes up in flames, who the hell is at the end of the trailer
fuck this story and everyone who cares
harSon said:If you can't see the harm in that word then...
no some chick opens here eyes. it's the first trailer linked, at youtubeSynless said:Who? The hispanic looking dude? with the axe?
MC Safety said:I was not referring to the original poster's commentary, but rather your statements.
The nature of an artistic statement is inherently personal. Which means it will inevitably come in conflict with other ideas and perspectives. The result of calls of racism and racial insensitivity in the case of Resident Evil 5 may well be bowdlerization.
If stating this simple truth makes me somehow less of a gaming age poster in your eyes, well, so be it.