SNES had a motion controller? That's pretty mind blowing. I know MS did it before Sony but that's crazy.Can we please stop with the "who is copying who" wars. Eventually someone is going to reach this level of retardation.
SNES had a motion controller? That's pretty mind blowing. I know MS did it before Sony but that's crazy.Can we please stop with the "who is copying who" wars. Eventually someone is going to reach this level of retardation.
Only "and". GBA outsold PSP, in half the time on shelves.There are more people who own a DS and/or PSP then there are people who owned a GBA, more consumers means more games, it's simple math really. The PSP and DS library combined are superior to that of the GBA alone.
One reason could be that the previous Street Fighter 4 console release was released about 10 months before SF4 3DS. With Marvel VS Capcom, the difference is about 1 month. SF4 3DS also looks pretty cool in 3D doesnt it? It could be a showcase.
SNES had a motion controller? That's pretty mind blowing. I know MS did it before Sony but that's crazy.
Can we please stop with the "who is copying who" wars. Eventually someone is going to reach this level of retardation.
Who cares? I just want more games, be it on 3DS or Vita. It makes little difference to me in the long run.
That's awesomeCan we please stop with the "who is copying who" wars. Eventually someone is going to reach this level of retardation.
That's awesome
I didn't know Dreamcast had a camera add on.
Only in Japan and only used in a handful of stuff.
Actually functioned as a web cam on the Dreamcast.
For me it kinda does, seeing as 3DS games look as they do. Can't I have great gameplay and good graphics?
For me it kinda does, seeing as 3DS games look as they do. Can't I have great gameplay and good graphics?
Don't have to be a high end PC. "Strong hardware" is "enough".If graphics means so much to you I'm sure you do most of your gaming on a high end PC. I also wish all games were developed with a high end PC as the leading platform, but that will never happen.
I own all the current consoles\handheld, and a good PC. I don't mind how games look on their respective platforms. To me 360\PS3, DS\PSP\3DS\Vita all look fine given their limitations. Fun games are fun regardless of the platform.
Buy a powerful laptop instead?
If graphics means so much to you I'm sure you do most of your gaming on a high end PC.
OMG still these "graphic VS gameplay" discussion? Warptime! 2004 is back!
Joke aparts, I think that 3ds graphic, when properly developed, is really good. Vita graphic is even better!
If I'll have money, I'll buy Vita also (probably not at launch).
That said: does anyone think that it's strange that Sony gave an official reply to this Nikkei article?
I think the assertion that 3DS graphics are insufficient is the problem people are having with your statement.Yes, because the form factor for PSVita and laptop/desktop PC is the same? I like powerful graphics ON a portable. Why can't I have both? With PSVita I can, but it seems others have a problem with that?
That said: does anyone think that it's strange that Sony gave an official reply to this Nikkei article?
"I did not see that quote, but you see extremist quotes like that all the time," says Rohde, who spoke to Gamasutra about the incipient launch of the Vita in North America.
I think the assertion that 3DS graphics are insufficient is the problem people are having with your statement.
Also, the high-end PC comment likely means that any console is insufficient because it's so out-dated compared to what a PC can offer, and therefore you would never buy a console because it can't offer the highest-end experience that your statements indicate you demand.
Well, they really didn't, if you read the article at Gamasutra.
So the guy was asked, but has no idea what he's responding to, and he wouldn't be in a position to know anything. How would a guy at SCEA know the status of Vita development of third parties in Japan? He just guessed at an answer.
Yep, I agree that graphics are fine on both 3DS and Vita. And if a game was on 3DS and Vita, I would most likely buy the Vita version. Just like multi-platform games on the ps3\360, I'll pick whichever is the superior version. But I'm still fine if a game was developed only for the 3DS, I think the graphics on 3DS games are adequate.
Thank you for the clarification! Actually, you seems right.
That said, I think that it's quiet funny how a lot of different sources claimed for 3DoooomedS and now are claiming for PSdeath...
Negative articles give you more clicks = more ad revenue.
Keep in mind that the GBA was replaced after three years and dead by four, while both the PSP and DS have enjoyed nearly eight years of life and are only now being replaced.
Nope, but the NES did. It was so bad.
That's not what you said though, writing is key:I consider devices relative to their category and purpose. Yes, I have a high end-PC, do most of my gaming on a PC, I still have PS3 for great console-only titles.
For portables I cannot have a PC at the palm of my hand. So I have two choices: 3DS or PSVita. Ofc Vita will not offer me PC graphics, however it does offer better graphics than the other portable system.
Maybe if you said 'best', 'good' implies otherwise, as to say 3DS graphics are now terrible/insufficient (which is lightyears from the truth). Plus good graphics almost always depend on the art style.For me it kinda does, seeing as 3DS games look as they do. Can't I have great gameplay and good graphics?
That's a bit different though, that SNES controller is a tit-controlled gamepad