TrueReligion
Banned
that looks pretty neat...but, it's an add-on, so...
this.Sgt. Killjoy said:Lightsaber
camineet said:![]()
It gets real now.
teiresias said:When I think 1:1 I think I point here on the screen and the pointer goes there like a laser pointer. I don't see anything in this PR to make me think that's what this does. The term 1:1 is used more like an advert buzzword in this context. I need to see this in demos with different size screens to see if it actually matches what I think 1:1 actually is.
From the wording of the PR I wouldnt be surprised if this thing just has higher precision accelerometers and/or gyros (possibly sampled at higher rates) that replace those built into the stand-alone Wiimote when its plugged in.
agrajag said:The mouse cursor moves in 1:1 with the movement of the mouse, it's nothing like a lazer pointer. Besides, with careful calibration (something that you have to do, adjusting your position and distance from the screen), what you're speaking of is already possible with current remotes.
I don't know what your idea of 1:1 has any use for besides light gun games. The 1:1 everybody else is talking about is swinging a remote and the lightsaber on screen replicating your swing exactly, not only your swing, but your tinies motion, with accurate speed and arc of the motion, without any lag.
Wow you're dumb.J-Rzez said:I don't think that this breaks MS's or Sony's back either like people make it seem to believe. If either of those 2 release anything similar to this, favor is in their hands. They have software solutions on their side for this, as in generation track record, upcoming titles, and devs that will "properly" respond to this faster.
And you're even dumber.Mzo said:Anyway, this is how it is: the majority of Wii owners aren't gamers.
Anasui Kishibe said:
Anasui Kishibe said:well Miyamoto said TP would be the last Zelda as we know it, which implies a pretty big change for the next game. My opinion is that they're really going to revolutionize the serie, and it being FP sounds like that
Gwanatu T said:Is this real?
Jason's Ultimatum said:No he didn't. That was a mistranslation. I don't know why people keeps bringing this up.
Gwanatu T said:Is this real? IF so and it's compatible with this 1:1 thing, man I'm more stoked for that than anything else, except maybe Dead Rising 2. Come on Capcom, DO IT!
CharlieDigital said:Mouse does not move 1:1 with the cursor. If it did, you'd have to move it 24 inches (two feet on your desk) if you moved your mouse from one corner of a 24" monitor to the other. I guess you could calibrate your mouse to 1:1, but that's just fucking stupid.
camineet said:![]()
Of course that's realbullshit, look the back cover. it has old Twilight Princess screens, the one on the right is from 2004.
Apparently we will be able to do this now (at 1:35):FieryBalrog said:What exactly does 1:1 motion mean compared to what we have now? So many conflicting opinions in this thread.
agrajag said:It has a certain ratio that it consistently follows. For example, every milimeter you move your mouse, the cursor moves a centimeter, all the time. That is one to one, although scaled. It's very accurate and precise.
Actually, on my laptop's touchpad, it's pretty close. From one end of the pad to the other it's about 3 inches, if I drag my finger from one end to the other, the cursor travels slightly over 5 inches on the screen. The technology is there, it's just more convenient for the motions to be slightly exaggerated. The precision and responciveness is still the same. That is how I imagine 1:1 on the Wii would be.
Game-Biz said:![]()
Are you fo' real?
camineet said:wat ?
Yep, and that was, what, 5 years ago ? :/Jason's Ultimatum said:Actually, I remember the thread. It was a radio interview, and someone in the thread pointed out they couldn't find the original source of the interview. Forget that it was a mistranslation. The interview never even happened.
FieryBalrog said:What exactly does 1:1 motion mean compared to what we have now? So many conflicting opinions in this thread.
Stormbringer said:Yep, and that was, what, 5 years ago ? :/
It was actually in an e3 closed press meeting a few years ago. It certainly happened. I remember he was even asked specifically about 1:1 play and pretty much inferred that's what he wanted.Jason's Ultimatum said:Actually, I remember the thread. It was a radio interview, and someone in the thread pointed out they couldn't find the original source of the interview. Forget that it was a mistranslation. The interview never even happened.
ggnoobIGN said:It was actually in an e3 closed press meeting a few years ago. It certainly happened. I remember he was even asked specifically about 1:1 play and pretty much inferred that's what he wanted.
CharlieDigital said:Right, and that ratio is not 1:1![]()
Well, 4 years maybe ?Jason's Ultimatum said:5 years ago? Sure, if you're Superman and you make time go by faster. :lol :lol
No. Heck, I even quickly googled it and there are plenty of results:Jason's Ultimatum said:I'm not sure about that. You must be talking about something else.
Little Green Yoda said:Even with 1:1, there's still the problem of "blade-clashing", is there not? Or am I mistaken?
ggnoobIGN said:No. Heck, I even quickly googled it and there are plenty of results:
"He said that he wants a whole different base of control to take form for the next addition to the series"
"When asked about one-to-one swordplay and full Wiimote control, he said he was dying to flesh out all the ideas but says its still pretty open."
Little Green Yoda said:Even with 1:1, there's still the problem of "blade-clashing", is there not? Or am I mistaken?