• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Nvidia Geforce GTX 1070 Review Thread

Anyone else here with this card still clutching to their overclocked i5 2500k's?

I just want 60FPS on everything on my regular ass 1080p monitor. No interest in 4K right now.
 
Anyone else here with this card still clutching to their overclocked i5 2500k's?

I just want 60FPS on everything on my regular ass 1080p monitor. No interest in 4K right now.

I don't get where people think 2500ks are not good anymore... they're still monsters of CPUs. I have mine at 4.5 GHz and a 1070 and I get 55-60fps on ultra from Witcher 3 at 1440
 
I want to buy a Gigabyte 1070 FE so badly. It's just sitting there on Newegg, In Stock, ready to buy.

What do I do?!

I just spent $500 with next day shipping and I have slight buyers remorse. But I normally get that after dropping console money on a single PC component.

But I have a feeling the jet engine fan on the thing will dry my tears when I'm finally running Witcher 3 in 60 FPS.
 
I just spent $500 with next day shipping and I have slight buyers remorse. But I normally get that after dropping console money on a single card.

But I have a feeling the jet engine fan on the thing will dry my tears when I'm finally running Witcher 3 in 60 FPS.

My issue is it would be the majority of my spending money. But after hearing how it improves frame times... that is a major issue I've had with the 970.
 
I just spent $500 with next day shipping and I have slight buyers remorse. But I normally get that after dropping console money on a single card.

But I have a feeling the jet engine fan on the thing will dry my tears when I'm finally running Witcher 3 in 60 FPS.

It's ok, the cards are like $630 in Canada and we make about as much or less than you guys do.
 
I don't get where people think 2500ks are not good anymore... they're still monsters of CPUs. I have mine at 4.5 GHz and a 1070 and I get 55-60fps on ultra from Witcher 3 at 1440

We've spent the last two decades being trained that a cpu more than two years old is ancient and good only for the trash heap. It's still hard to accept ;)

I can't dream of affording a 1080, I was willing to pay out for a 1070, but this CAD prices are brutal... way above exchange rate. Hopefully they stabilise, if not I may have to switch to the AMD alternative. Nothing against AMD but I love Nvidia's software suite and really wanted stuff like GeForce Experience, Shadowplay, etc. I will have this card for a number of years, so my deal breaker is I want above 4GB VRAM. I passed up on some sweet deals at the end of 2015 on the 8GB 390 because I wanted to stay Nvidia and had faith in Pascal... the tech is great, but the cost, not so much. I want to get off of my 560Ti I don't want to wait it out in the hope that a 1060 is actually affordable :(
 
I just spent $500 with next day shipping and I have slight buyers remorse. But I normally get that after dropping console money on a single PC component.

But I have a feeling the jet engine fan on the thing will dry my tears when I'm finally running Witcher 3 in 60 FPS.

Just booted up W3 for a test run. Maxed settings. Locked 60fps. Goddamn beautiful.
 
God damn, game has become impossible in solo que. ALWAYS getting dumb teams, and I mean constanly, not people being very good agaisnt us, but teams when even working together being terrible, 10 seconds left, WHY THE **** IS EVERYONE BACKING OFF THE PAYLOAD AS I RETURN?

Overwatch thread's around the corner bro. But as a fellow Overwatcher also looking to buy a GTX 1070, I feel your pain.
 
I don't get where people think 2500ks are not good anymore... they're still monsters of CPUs. I have mine at 4.5 GHz and a 1070 and I get 55-60fps on ultra from Witcher 3 at 1440

Hmm that's interesting. I am thinking whether I need a complete new rig or whether I should just upgrade my 560Ti. So this would be compatible with the 2500K mobos?

My PSU is a 6 years old Seasonic 620W. Would that be enough for this card?
 
Hmm that's interesting. I am thinking whether I need a complete new rig or whether I should just upgrade my 560Ti. So this would be compatible with the 2500K mobos?

My PSU is a 6 years old Seasonic 620W. Would that be enough for this card?
PSU is fine, motherboard is fine. Just put the new card in. And overclock your 2500k if you haven't already.
 
Hmm that's interesting. I am thinking whether I need a complete new rig or whether I should just upgrade my 560Ti. So this would be compatible with the 2500K mobos?

My PSU is a 6 years old Seasonic 620W. Would that be enough for this card?

yes for the PSU.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4sx1kLGVAF0

I know this isn't the i5 2500k but the 2600k is basically the same thing with hyper-threading and from what I'm aware of hyper-threading in most cases doesn't really add much to performance. Theirs only a few instances where it falls behind in more cpu intensive games at 1080p and even less at 1440p but when it does you're still well over 60fps either way. I would say 90% of the time there won't be much of a difference, especially if the i5 2500k is overclocked to 4.4+.

So I would say anyone with these the i5 2500k/2600k with a decent overclock should just rock with it for a little while longer and get a stronger gpu.
 

I think if I were to upgrade from my 970 to a 1070, the Gigabyte G1 is the card I'd get. Boost clock the same as the EVGA SC, and the OC mode is even higher. Card doesn't look hideous either, and is priced at $429.99 US, cheaper than most.

The problem for me right now is that $430 is freaking $50 more than what Nvidia said the MSRP would be. The pricing as everyone said for both 1070 and 1080 has been a joke so far.
 
I think if I were to upgrade from my 970 to a 1070, the Gigabyte G1 is the card I'd get. Boost clock the same as the EVGA SC, and the OC mode is even higher. Card doesn't look hideous either, and is priced at $429.99 US, cheaper than most.

The problem for me right now is that $430 is freaking $50 more than what Nvidia said the MSRP would be. The pricing as everyone said for both 1070 and 1080 has been a joke so far.

Well, that's an OCed card, they are always more expensive than the stated MSRP.
 
Hoping to get some opinions from dudes. I have the opportunity to get an EVGA 980 ti FTW for about $350. I was planning on getting a 1070 as I like the lower power consumption (and theoretically less heat) as my rig is built in an htpc case (fractal 605). I have a standard 980 SC now, and was hoping to get something possibly water cooled, due to the amount of heat that already exists in the case. But man, $350 seems like a solid deal for similar/better performance than what the 1070s are priced at right now.

Thanks for any input amigos!
 
PSA: according to this article (it's in French but is being relayed by other English-language websites such as Videocardz), the Asus GTX 1070 Strix Gaming (as well as the MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X) were shipped to reviewers with modified BIOSes which gave them frequency bumps.

Consumers can access those higher frequencies through OCing and manufacturer app profiles but the stock cards shipped to consumers run at lower clocks, meaning: don't trust the review benchmarks for those cards, they are not entirely accurate.

E: posters below me are right, but it's still shitty.
 
PSA: according to this article (it's in French but is being relayed by other English-language websites such as Videocardz), the Asus GTX 1070 Strix Gaming (as well as the MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X) were shipped to reviewers with modified BIOSes which gave them frequency bumps.

Consumers can access those higher frequencies through OCing and manufacturer app profiles but the stock cards shipped to consumers run at lower clocks, meaning: don't trust the review benchmarks for those cards, they are not entirely accurate.

It's 1% difference at best. And that's not the first and even the second time AIBs are doing something like this. They have to compete between themselves somehow.
 
PSA: according to this article (it's in French but is being relayed by other English-language websites such as Videocardz), the Asus GTX 1070 Strix Gaming (as well as the MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X) were shipped to reviewers with modified BIOSes which gave them frequency bumps.

Consumers can access those higher frequencies through OCing and manufacturer app profiles but the stock cards shipped to consumers run at lower clocks, meaning: don't trust the review benchmarks for those cards, they are not entirely accurate.

The clocks were only increased by 25mhz, so the benchmarks are basically still accurate. Out of principle however, it's a shit practice.
 
Im actually trying to decide if I should go for a MSI 980ti or try and hold off for the 1070 version, based off of reviews performance wise they are both the same and when overcloced the 980ti pulls ahead by a few frames.
 
Im actually trying to decide if I should go for a MSI 980ti or try and hold off for the 1070 version, based off of reviews performance wise they are both the same and when overcloced the 980ti pulls ahead by a few frames.

980ti's still selling for $600 on Amazon. Waiting for 1070.
 
A 1070 will work fine with a Intel 3570K correct ?

Also jumping from a 670 to this looks like it will be a beast.
 
I think if I were to upgrade from my 970 to a 1070, the Gigabyte G1 is the card I'd get. Boost clock the same as the EVGA SC, and the OC mode is even higher. Card doesn't look hideous either, and is priced at $429.99 US, cheaper than most.

The problem for me right now is that $430 is freaking $50 more than what Nvidia said the MSRP would be. The pricing as everyone said for both 1070 and 1080 has been a joke so far.

I bit the bullet and preordered one despite the $50 price hike. That price took me a lot closer to the 1080 than I'd like but I still save around $200 when all is said and done and that's nothing to sneeze at. That's $200 I can put down on the next card in probably 2 years time. The other thing is if I go 1080, I probably wouldn't jump back to a 1170.

The $430 price tag is a bit high but there's honestly not much choice, the EVGA ACX3.0 is the cheapest at $420 and doesn't have any factory overclock. Fine if you want to save $10 but it's not even available to preorder. The $379 cards are literally going to be those shitty plastic blower style cards nobody wants.
 
Hoping to get some opinions from dudes. I have the opportunity to get an EVGA 980 ti FTW for about $350. I was planning on getting a 1070 as I like the lower power consumption (and theoretically less heat) as my rig is built in an htpc case (fractal 605). I have a standard 980 SC now, and was hoping to get something possibly water cooled, due to the amount of heat that already exists in the case. But man, $350 seems like a solid deal for similar/better performance than what the 1070s are priced at right now.

Thanks for any input amigos!

The 980Ti is basically equivalent to the 1070 so that's a great deal considering the 1070 really starts at $420 for a decent one. The 1070s only advantage is that it has multiprojection available and could potentially increase performance by 2x in VR. If you don't or not going to use VR, the 980 Ti is just as good and potentially overclocks better.
 
That is tempting lol. I'm guessing the 1070 is lower power though which is less cooling?

Edit: Oh I think i'll continue to wait for a 1070 or for my 1080 to ship for VR performance gains.

Yea its a pretty good deal considering you can grab it now for probably the same or a little bit cheaper than the 1070 MSI Gaming counterpart whenever that decided to be available. I'm not really into VR at the moment so its not a big deal to me but I rather be on the newer side of nvidia architecture for better driver support down the line so I might hold off as well.
 
Are card sizes about the same as 970's? I'd love to have a little shorter card this time around if at all possible.

Not 100% sure about all the cards but the MSI Gaming 1070 is about an inch longer than the 970 counterpart so if anything I'd expect them to be bigger cards but probably not by too much. I would just check the size of your card and compare it to the version if the 1070 you're interested in.

I'm having to buy a completely different case if I expect anything bigger than the 970 to fit.
 
Not 100% sure about all the cards but the MSI Gaming 1070 is about an inch longer than the 970 counterpart so if anything I'd expect them to be bigger cards but probably not by too much. I would just check the size of your card and compare it to the version if the 1070 you're interested in.

I'm having to buy a completely different case if I expect anything bigger than the 970 to fit.

That's not encouraging, since msi gtx 970 gaming is exactly what I have right now and it's extremely cramped as is.
Looks like EVGA SC Gaming ACX 3.0 is a little shorter, and also cheaper right now, so maybe I'll switch from msi.
 
The 980Ti is basically equivalent to the 1070 so that's a great deal considering the 1070 really starts at $420 for a decent one. The 1070s only advantage is that it has multiprojection available and could potentially increase performance by 2x in VR. If you don't or not going to use VR, the 980 Ti is just as good and potentially overclocks better.

Got it. that's helpful, thanks. I figured I'd also be in for 90 day step up too if I really decided I want something else.

I also assume anything like the EVGA hybrid 1070 or MSI sea hawk would be coming in higher than $450?

Maybe a related question, but is there any way to throw a water cooler on the 980ti ftw?
 
So the power cord might not be the same?

They usually come with adapters.


Hmm that's interesting. I am thinking whether I need a complete new rig or whether I should just upgrade my 560Ti. So this would be compatible with the 2500K mobos?

My PSU is a 6 years old Seasonic 620W. Would that be enough for this card?

Should work. Just make sure your mobo has PCIE 3.0 if it doesn't it should still work just slower.
 
Top Bottom