Rolf NB said:What the hell is a Coremark?
What is CoreMark?
Processors and associated systems are getting increasingly complex requiring increasingly complex benchmarks to analyze. The current and future EEMBC benchmarks are aimed at specific embedded market segments and are very successful at approximating real-world performance of embedded devices. However, there is also a need for a widely-available, generic benchmark specifically targeted at the processor core. Introducing CoreMark -- Developed by EEMBC, this is a simple, yet sophisticated, benchmark that is designed specifically to test the functionality of a processor core. Running CoreMark produces a single-number score allowing users to make quick comparisons between processors.
plagiarize said:they could call them laptops, cause you could put them on your lap!
okayZaptruder said:I meant smart phones.
I've taken to calling smart phones mobile computing devices...
because the phone part of them has become so auxillary.
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Nvidia-zeigt-Quad-Core-ARM-Tablet-1190778.htmlDoch während Nvidia den CoreMark-Android-Code für Kal-El mit dem GCC 4.4.1 und vielen Optimierungen erzeugt hat (-O3 -mcpu=cortex-a8 -funroll-loops -falign-loops=8 -fgcse-sm -fno-tree-vectorize -marm /Heap / 4Threads), gönnte man dem Core 2 Duo nur einen älteren Compiler (GCC 3.4.4 (cygming special, gdc 0.12 using dmd 0.125) -O2 -DPERFORMANCE_RUN=1 -lrt / 2
Threads). Mit höher optimiertem Code übertrumpft aber im c't-Labor sogar ein Atom D525 (2 Kerne/1,8 GHz) den Kal-El mit 11.311 CoreMark-Punkten (GCC 4.4.4-10 -O3 -DMULTITHREAD=8 -DUSE_PTHREAD -lrt / Heap / 8
Threads).
wsippel said:heise had a look at the CoreBench result and claims it is pure marketing BS:
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Nvidia-zeigt-Quad-Core-ARM-Tablet-1190778.html
Basically, Nvidia used a much less optimized version of Coremakr compiled with a much older version of GCC to get an unusually low result for the C2D to make Kal-El look much more powerful than it actually is. With an up-to-date compiler and proper optimizations even an Atom D525 outperforms Kal-El in Coremark.
Reading must not be one of your strong suits.zerokoolpsx said:Kal-El, Wayne, Logan, Stark.......... lol, where's Bruce??
wsippel said:heise had a look at the CoreBench result and claims it is pure marketing BS:
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Nvidia-zeigt-Quad-Core-ARM-Tablet-1190778.html
Basically, Nvidia used a much less optimized version of Coremakr compiled with a much older version of GCC to get an unusually low result for the C2D to make Kal-El look much more powerful than it actually is. With an up-to-date compiler and proper optimizations even an Atom D525 outperforms Kal-El in Coremark.
That's the Nvidia I know. I am still in love with my GTX580 though.wsippel said:heise had a look at the CoreBench result and claims it is pure marketing BS:
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Nvidia-zeigt-Quad-Core-ARM-Tablet-1190778.html
Basically, Nvidia used a much less optimized version of Coremakr compiled with a much older version of GCC to get an unusually low result for the C2D to make Kal-El look much more powerful than it actually is. With an up-to-date compiler and proper optimizations even an Atom D525 outperforms Kal-El in Coremark.
Reading must not be one of your strong suits.
inner-G said:Beat a c2d?![]()
Log4Girlz said:What puzzles me about that chart is why use the most powerful super hero's name, Kal-El being superman for christ's sake and then have Batman, Wolverine and Iron Man above him. It makes no sense. lol
its called UHDV, (Ultra high Definition Television)StarEye said:Well, we went from VGA to Super VGA, so we could go from HD to Super HD (SHD).
so it's only 20% better than the Exynos? mehLazy8s said:Tegra 3 just hit the benchmarks with the Asus TF201 Transformer.
Managed to top the older Exynos 4210 with Mali-400MP4.
http://glbenchmark.com/result.jsp?b...3&os=4&version=all&certified_only=1&brand=all
Lazy8s said:Tegra 3 just hit the benchmarks with the Asus TF201 Transformer.
Managed to top the older Exynos 4210 with Mali-400MP4.
http://glbenchmark.com/result.jsp?b...3&os=4&version=all&certified_only=1&brand=all