Ploid 3.0 said:So the 7 is from the guy that had to lower his score by one point if warhawk was above $30? lol
XHitoshuraX said:You have all overlooked the most important aspect of the issue...
WHAT THE HELL DID THEY SAY ABOUT SILENT HILL 5!?!?!?
ahem.
MassiveAttack said:rumor Capcom working on Okami Wii
bioshock 10, 10, 10 gotm
Post history says his ass is sore after the EGM Lair scores.spwolf said:why?
nib95 said:Not bad at all for the PS3. Also, considering EGM knocked a whole point off Warhawk for being more than $30, that means Warhawk would have scored 9.5, 9, 9.5!!
spwolf said:why?
p.s. thats how I would rate Wowhawk beta... probably even better for final, but it also depends if they tested final version which didnt have many players playing it... it is big difference to beta test with thousands of players...
Mojovonio said:you're seriously retarded.
Fall 2008 for PS3/XBox 360 (no Wii version mentioned)XHitoshuraX said:You have all overlooked the most important aspect of the issue...
WHAT THE HELL DID THEY SAY ABOUT SILENT HILL 5!?!?!?
ahem.
Dammit,that rumor just need to stop.MassiveAttack said:rumor Capcom working on Okami Wii
Positioning Warhawk's pricing is important for Sony, but the ripple effect has sparked debate within the 1UP Network. Sony won't tell us the pricing plans are, and as a result, EGM reviewers have been forced to include caveats in their write ups. Lead reviewer (and former OPM editor) Joe Rybicki actually placed a note in his review to EGM Reviews Editor Greg Ford that his score should be dropped a whole point if the price was announced above $30, and the other reviewers have expressed concern over how they should judge the game.
"What I don't understand is why Sony can't give us a price when it seems like internally they have one ready. The game is done, our reviewers have been playing it, and each one has asked about the price, which we certainly take into consideration in our reviews," says Ford. "Because of the lead time for a print publication, we're forced to go to print with a caveat in our review addressing this issue. Not ideal, and it seems unnecessary. It's too bad because otherwise, the company has been great getting us the review code, setting up multiplayer play sessions, and providing assets to go along with the review...just no price, which for some consumers is what matters most."
Medal of Honor - 6.5, 8, 5.5
Actually, to be honest, and I've said this a couple of times before, I didn't like the combat in the demo terribly much compared to Ninja Gaiden or Devil May Cry. I just felt a lot more limited than those games, probably since there's no block or jump button and the camera is largely fixed.$1148 Jack said:People should really take notice of this (hopefully..) If you are a fan of any demo/pre-release beta etc. you should give that precedence over any score received. Much better than trying to convince yourself that the game is either better/worse than when you played it based on opinions other than your own.
Alcibiades said:NHL - 9.5, 9, 9
yessyllogism said:Is this MoH: Airborne?
Shame, a lot of people were looking forward to that as an exclusiveAlcibiades said:The Mysims 6, 5.5, 6 scores are for Wii
Is that for NHL 08 or NHL 2K8? I'm assuming the former and that these scores are for X360 (predominantly), but clarification would be welcomed.Alcibiades said:NHL - 9.5, 9, 9
Reilly said:actually, no it's not.
you really think 8,8,9 is a GOTY kind of score? it's a good score, but i expect ratchet and clank and uncharted to both do better.spwolf said:there you go... HS PS3 GOTY. As EXPECTED.
Alcibiades said:Fall 2008 for PS3/XBox 360 (no Wii version mentioned)
yeah EA's NHL for 360 & PS3 (same with Madden)Guy Legend said:Wow, that's EA's NHL 08 right? No NHL 2k8?
Alcibiades said:Wild Arms 5 - 8, 6.5, 5
Dahbomb said:EGM PS3 scores adjusted for reality:
Heavenly Sword - 9, 9, 10
Warhawk - 8.5, 8, 8.5
I think that it is getting annoying that game X score = game Y score comparisons to support forum arguments. That could be the reason for the retard comment.gcubed said:? this confuses me
Alcibiades said:Fall 2008 for PS3/XBox 360 (no Wii version mentioned)
gcubed said:? this confuses me
plagiarize said:you really think 8,8,9 is a GOTY kind of score? it's a good score, but i expect ratchet and clank and uncharted to both do better.
nib95 said:Not bad at all for the PS3. Also, considering EGM knocked a whole point off Warhawk for being more than $30, that means Warhawk would have scored 9.5, 9, 9.5!!
Considering the $40 price isn't even an issue for me, it's basically a AAA online experience according to EGM. I absolutely loved the BETA, and it's a day one purchase for me.
Even with your twisted logic your wrong.warhawk 8.5, 7, 8.5
Then MP:C wont even get a game of the month.Alcibiades said:how the heck did some college town in the middle of nowhere get the issues first?
I thought I'd missed some giant thread or something and had missed all the talk...
some more scores:
Corruption & Halo 3 not reviews
Wild Arms 5 - 8, 6.5, 5
Eternal Sonata - 6, 8, 7
Madden 2008- 9, 9, 8.5
NHL 2008 (EA) - 9.5, 9, 9
Medal of Honor - 6.5, 8, 5.5
The Mysims 6, 5.5, 6 scores are for Wii
And yeah, Shane gave Heavenly Sword the 9
Visualante said:I think that it is getting annoying that game X score = game Y score comparisons to support forum arguments. That could be the reason for the retard comment.
Mojovonio said:because he's calling it the PS3 GOTY when the 2 biggest games haven't even been released yet, maybe?
Mojovonio said:because he's calling it the PS3 GOTY when the 2 biggest games haven't even been released yet, maybe?
Sean said:Actually those Warhawk scores are before the 1 point deduction, 1UP explains it here:
http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3161677