• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Official 2007 NBA Finals Thread - Damon Jones is in the Finals? Dear God No!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Eminem said:
No disrespect to Kobe, but he is not worth disbanding our core by any means.
I still say Gordon can go, but outside of that, we need the rest of our young core guys.

well if Kobe comes they won't get any shots anyways.. if I was Chi-town Gordon and Hinrich for Kobe.. all the way.. CD is playing well for you guys and could easily start at PG..
 
Blackace said:
well if Kobe comes they won't get any shots anyways.. if I was Chi-town Gordon and Hinrich for Kobe.. all the way.. CD is playing well for you guys and could easily start at PG..

Duhon actually regressed horribly this year. I kind of want him to get cut, honestly. I'm not quite sure how he did get worse, since one would assume the longer you are in the league, the better you get... but Du was really awful this year.
 
Eminem said:
Duhon actually regressed horribly this year. I kind of want him to get cut, honestly. I'm not quite sure how he did get worse, since one would assume the longer you are in the league, the better you get... but Du was really awful this year.

but isn;t really a point.. if you did get Kobe he would see less shots...
 
shibby said:
How the hell can Sheridan say that the Knicks are championship contenders?:lol
I assume he meant after the trade if it happened.

Now I'm not saying I want him but it made for an interesting read.
 
Blackace said:
but isn;t really a point.. if you did get Kobe he would see less shots...

We'd also lose our best defender in Kirk.

I mean obviously, it depends what the entire package would be. But I don't think Duhon is a worthy starter, Kobe on the team or not.


If Paxson is going to break up the core, I'd much rather try for KG over Kobe. But I honestly don't think he'll move many of the main guys we have right now.
 
Eminem said:
We'd also lose our best defender in Kirk.

I mean obviously, it depends what the entire package would be. But I don't think Duhon is a worthy starter, Kobe on the team or not.


If Paxson is going to break up the core, I'd much rather try for KG over Kobe. But I honestly don't think he'll move many of the main guys we have right now.

Kirk is an underrated defender that is for sure.. but I think a lineup of

PG Duhon
SG Kobe
SF Deng
PF ???
C Wallace

looks great to me.. Bulls need a go to guy imo.. Kobe fits the bill
 
Blackace said:
Kirk is an underrated defender that is for sure.. but I think a lineup of

PG Duhon
SG Kobe
SF Deng
PF ???
C Wallace

looks great to me.. Bulls need a go to guy imo.. Kobe fits the bill

Nocioni would be at PF in this scenario. I'm fine with that, I love Notch.

I'm just glad I don't have to make decisions like Paxson does, because man, he has so many options with this team right now.
 
Blackace said:
Kirk is an underrated defender that is for sure.. but I think a lineup of

PG Duhon
SG Kobe
SF Deng
PF ???
C Wallace

looks great to me.. Bulls need a go to guy imo.. Kobe fits the bill

Kobe alongside a Deng fulfilling potential would be insane. But I just feel like the Bulls are too loyal to Hinrich..I'd be too.
 
Blackace said:
well if Kobe comes they won't get any shots anyways.. if I was Chi-town Gordon and Hinrich for Kobe.. all the way.. CD is playing well for you guys and could easily start at PG..
.... um salaries don't even come close to matching.

EDIT: It'd have to be Gordon, Nocioni (sign-and-trade), Deng and maybe Thomas or Duhon.
 
Eminem said:
Nocioni would be at PF in this scenario. I'm fine with that, I love Notch.

I'm just glad I don't have to make decisions like Paxson does, because man, he has so many options with this team right now.

I just would not give up Deng... The Bulls are in good shape but the lack of someone they can just goto at anytime of a game hurts them I think...
 
The Frankman said:
.... um salaries don't even come close to matching.

Yeah I know that.. they'd have to give up some more things to match it up.. but when it comes down to it those would be the players they'd be trading for..
 
pheeniks said:
But I just feel like the Bulls are too loyal to Hinrich..I'd be too.

Honestly, this is the biggest thing with me. Everyone around here loves Hinrich, and deservedly so. Even on talk radio, all of it is usually "what can we get by trading X player as long as it isn't Hinrich."

I honestly can't see him getting traded. It might be the right move depending on the offers(of course no one will ever know), but I can't see a deal in which he leaves Chicago.
 
Hollywood_mIRC said:
Honestly I expect a little more interest from Lebron, but he's not MJ, or the Celtics-Lakers or Lakers-Pistons rivalries. I think either of these teams just pale in comparison to some of the past teams from the 82-98 era. Neither would hang with any of the Bulls, Lakers, Celtics, or Pistons teams - and runners up over the years like Utah, Seattle, Phoenix, etc would have probably smoked them. The league definitely needs an increase in great teams, and more balance in the Eastern conference. The draft situation is definitely not going to help matters.

Bah... the GAF server just chewed up a long ass post I made. It's dangerous to post around midnight.
 
Hollywood_mIRC said:
The 1981 finals were preempted to put it in perspective how unpopular the NBA has been.

If the Lakers hadn't put down the Celtics once and for all in the 80s we'd have to deal with people like this still:

4zng35v.jpg


I don't the Association would've survived if it wasn't for that. I really don't.
 
The idea with the Chicago trade for Kobe, is not to give up Hinrich or Deng. You make a trade of Ben Gordon, Tyrus Thomas, Nocioni, and the #9 pick for Kobe. Maybe a future 1st round pick as well. Then you have great defenders bookending the defensive presence in Ben Wallace and Hinrich, free agent PF, a #2 in Deng, and Kobe.

THAT's why the Bulls make so much sense. They have depth, youth, potential, and a high draft pick. Lakers would be looking pretty good as well with a core of Gordon, Tyrus, Odom, Nocioni, and the #9. Future pick to seal the deal.

Sumidor said:
I see Durant like KG. Could put up sickly numbers, but never wins the big one.

He's going to be a better scorer than Garnett though. He can score in more ways. Defensively they're similar. Not right now of course, but I mean in potential and how each of them is coming into the league.
 
The Bulls would be stupid not to trade for Kobe. It would make them instant contenders for the championship. If you get that opportunity then go for it. Unless they are just trying to make a team that always makes the playoffs but will never advance far.

But personally I hope the Lakers just bring in some ****ing talent and keep Kobe around.
 
Looking at the what if trades, in the last few posts, who else would be scoring on the bulls?

It is a weaker conference, Bean would avg 40...but they would still have the problems scoring the ball, as they sometimes do now...their bench is horrible

And what would be their "window" with Lebron set to take over?

Oh, and he would have to face Arenas and Redd 4 times a year...O lord, that wont end well:lol
 
jordan0386 said:
Looking at the what if trades, in the last few posts, who else would be scoring on the bulls?

It is a weaker conference, Bean would avg 40...but they would still have the problems scoring the ball, as they sometimes do now...their bench is horrible

And what would be their "window" with Lebron set to take over?

Oh, and he would have to face Arenas and Redd 4 times a year...O lord, that wont end well:lol

He doesn't cover Arenas.. so it will be the same as when they play the lakers.
 
I dont see him getting moved though...lakers will make 3 trades imo

Odom for jermaine

Bynum for somebody

Farmer and Evans for somebody

They could take Utah's spot next season...but I still dont see them getting out the 1st round

If the top teams out east all headed into the playoffs healthy, I dunno if Kobe even gets out the first round there

MIL, CLE, MIA, DET, WAS, CHI...He would have to get through those 6 to get to a finals...It still isnt any easier...but he probably would save the East(viewership wise)
 
Hollywood_mIRC said:
MJ is right - the NBA NEEDS Lebron to succeed to bring fans interest up. Even with this Finals - its highly doubtful these Finals even match the interest of the Lakers Finals a few years ago. Lebron will draw a lot of interest, but Cleveland and San Antonio are very small cities - and San Antonio has the worst rap out of any Finals teams. The series over NJ in 03 was the worst rated ever recorded, and the 7 game series versus Detroit, even though it was close, was the 2nd worst from 82 to current behind the 03 Finals.

What the NBA needs is to stop being such an individualistic league and start focusing on marketing the actual sport and teams and not the drama and showboating of a few of their stars. Of course you're gonna get burned when you only promote a handful of players that in the end are completely incapable of going far into the playoffs, let alone win anything of significance.

Like it was said in one of the last broadcasts between SA-UTAH. If the Spurs played a in a big market city, the league would've found the way to make them the league's savior a long time ago. But with the way the NBA works, they'll just continue to shove them aside to highlight a few plays. Meanwhile the ignorant fans will continue to frown on how boring the Spurs are and ejaculate at every single Kobe dunk while on his way to another first round exit.

The NBA got themselves into that hole.
 
teruterubozu said:
Odom, Bynum, Farmer, Evans and Brown are all untradeable crap.
That's why Kobe wants out.

well Bynum they want to keep.. all deals that come the Lakers way have asked for him and they don't want to give him up..
 
BatiGOOOOOOL said:
What the NBA needs is to stop being such an individualistic league and start focusing on marketing the actual sport and teams and not the drama and showboating of a few of their stars. Of course you're gonna get burned when you only promote a handful of players that in the end are completely incapable of going far into the playoffs, let alone win anything of significance.

Like it was said in one of the last broadcasts between SA-UTAH. If the Spurs played a in a big market city, the league would've found the way to make them the league's savior a long time ago. But with the way the NBA works, they'll just continue to shove them aside to highlight a few plays. Meanwhile the ignorant fans will continue to frown on how boring the Spurs are and ejaculate at every single Kobe dunk while on his way to another first round exit.

The NBA got themselves into that hole.

The NBA needs a legitimate team rivalry more than anything else.
 
I dont see anything wrong with Pro hoop beyond low FG %...the game is fine, they should probably widen the baselines though

If they can raise and lower mounds in baseball, basketball could use a tweak
 
BatiGOOOOOOL said:
What the NBA needs is to stop being such an individualistic league and start focusing on marketing the actual sport and teams and not the drama and showboating of a few of their stars. Of course you're gonna get burned when you only promote a handful of players that in the end are completely incapable of going far into the playoffs, let alone win anything of significance.

Like it was said in one of the last broadcasts between SA-UTAH. If the Spurs played a in a big market city, the league would've found the way to make them the league's savior a long time ago. But with the way the NBA works, they'll just continue to shove them aside to highlight a few plays. Meanwhile the ignorant fans will continue to frown on how boring the Spurs are and ejaculate at every single Kobe dunk while on his way to another first round exit.

The NBA got themselves into that hole.
The NBA has a lot of problems: too many games, too many teams, not enough talent, playoffs take forever, and horrible marketing.

But lets be honest. The Spurs are boring and people don't want to watch them. Nothing the NBA can do is going to change that. I think most people (not this thread) probably wanted to see the Suns win the whole thing.
 
jordan0386 said:
I dont see anything wrong with Pro hoop beyond low FG %...the game is fine, they should probably widen the baselines though

If they can raise and lower mounds in baseball, basketball could use a tweak

yeah basketball never tweaks... lets actually have more than one season where Stern doesn't change a rule...
 
jordan0386 said:
Stern is counting the 50s and 100s...He is doing a fine job

hey let's move the 3 point line in.. let's moe it back.. no hand checking, zone! new ball!
 
Attendance is up every year...global appeal grows every year...league pass subscriptions up every year

rule changes...every year...guess we can add that too:lol
 
jordan0386 said:
Attendance is up every year...global appeal grows every year...league pass subscriptions up every year

rule changes...every year...guess we can add that too:lol

he is a fine commish.. just let's not pretend like he doesn't try to tweak the game.. shoot he is the only commish that can just decide on his own.. baseball they have to contact the afterlife and discuss
 
Five Simple Ways to Fix the NBA

1). Any team who has 4 consecutive years with a regular season record under .400 gets their NBA franchise rights revoked.

2). Any team who can't manage at least 20 wins in a single season gets relegated to the NBDL. If they can't win the NBDL championship the next year, then they didn't deserve to be in the NBA in the first place.

3). In the playoffs, go back to 5 game series for the first round and re-seed after every round.

4). Get rid of touch fouls, so the game flows better. Too many games get bogged down due to endless trips to the foul line.

5). Bring the NBA back on NBC and have TNT do *all* the cable broadcasts. ESPN should stick to televising high school cheerleading.
 
The Chosen One said:
Five Simple Ways to Fix the NBA

1). Any team who has 4 consecutive years with a regular season record under .400 gets their NBA franchise rights revoked.

2). Any team who can't manage at least 20 wins in a single season gets relegated to the NBDL. If they can't win the NBDL championship the next year, then they didn't deserve to be in the NBA in the first place.

3). In the playoffs, go back to 5 game series for the first round and re-seed after every round.

4). Get rid of touch fouls, so the game flows better. Too many games get bogged down due to endless trips to the foul line.

5). Bring the NBA back on NBC and have TNT do *all* the cable broadcasts. ESPN should stick to televising high school cheerleading.

wow.. that might be the most ridiculous thing I have read in here.. and someone said LBJ had a better jumpshot than MJ.. good job!
 
The Chosen One said:
Five Simple Ways to Fix the NBA

1). Any team who has 4 consecutive years with a regular season record under .400 gets their NBA franchise rights revoked.

2). Any team who can't manage at least 20 wins in a single season gets relegated to the NBDL. If they can't win the NBDL championship the next year, then they didn't deserve to be in the NBA in the first place.

3). In the playoffs, go back to 5 game series for the first round and re-seed after every round.

4). Get rid of touch fouls, so the game flows better. Too many games get bogged down due to endless trips to the foul line.

5). Bring the NBA back on NBC and have TNT do *all* the cable broadcasts. ESPN should stick to televising high school cheerleading.
1) and 2) are absolutely retarded, unless this is some sort of joke...
 
If I'm LA management, I refuse any offer from Chicago that doesn't include Deng. I'd ask for Deng, Gordon, Nocioni, and possibly a pick. If Kobe balks (as I imagine he'd do, since he wants to go to a team that has an immediate chance to win a title), I'd just sit on him and let him suffer in LA. Just on principle.

Kobe's ridiculous "no trade clause" unfortunately allows him to wield way too much power in this situation. No player should be able to essentially dictate the terms of trades to both teams involved.
 
Loki said:
If I'm LA management, I refuse any offer from Chicago that doesn't include Deng. I'd ask for Deng, Gordon, Nocioni, and possibly a pick. If Kobe balks (as I imagine he'd do, since he wants to go to a team that has an immediate chance to win a title), I'd just sit on him and let him suffer in LA. Just on principle.

Kobe's ridiculous "no trade clause" unfortunately allows him to wield way too much power in this situation. No player should be able to essentially dictate the terms of trades to both teams involved.

well this isn't something new to sports... I would send him to New York because you will get something back and he will have to play for Zeke..
 
AirBrian said:
Isn't Kobe the only player in the league to have a "no-trade" clause?

in the NBA yes..

Edit: and the Lakers should ask him to waive or to give them a list of teams that will waive it..
 
I remember P.J. Brown talking about having one, but he didn't get it. Who else has tried to get one lately?

What's the rule...eight years of service and four years with the same team?
 
Blackace said:
wow.. that might be the most ridiculous thing I have read in here.. and someone said LBJ had a better jumpshot than MJ.. good job!

Lighten up. :) Obviously I wasn't being serious. Especially 1 & 2.
 
AirBrian said:
I remember P.J. Brown talking about having one, but he didn't get it. Who else has tried to get one lately?

What's the rule...eight years of service and four years with the same team?

do they have that in the NBA too? I know baseball has the 10-5 rule
 
bionic77 said:
The NBA has a lot of problems: too many games, too many teams, not enough talent, playoffs take forever, and horrible marketing.

But lets be honest. The Spurs are boring and people don't want to watch them. Nothing the NBA can do is going to change that. I think most people (not this thread) probably wanted to see the Suns win the whole thing.
Because that's the whole idea the NBA has imprinted in everyone's mind. If it's not fast paced, high flying, trash talking, chest thumping basketball, then it's boring.

If someone has watched the Spurs play during this postseason and found them boring, then there's a big problem with the perception of the sport, because that's basketball at it's best on both ends of the floor. Too bad a league about basketball doesn't care enough about the game itself to highlight that.
 
The Chosen One said:
Five Simple Ways to Fix the NBA

1). Any team who has 4 consecutive years with a regular season record under .400 gets their NBA franchise rights revoked.

2). Any team who can't manage at least 20 wins in a single season gets relegated to the NBDL. If they can't win the NBDL championship the next year, then they didn't deserve to be in the NBA in the first place.

3). In the playoffs, go back to 5 game series for the first round and re-seed after every round.

4). Get rid of touch fouls, so the game flows better. Too many games get bogged down due to endless trips to the foul line.

5). Bring the NBA back on NBC and have TNT do *all* the cable broadcasts. ESPN should stick to televising high school cheerleading.

1-2 are obviously jokes, but I wouldn't mind seeing this. I wouldn't mind seeing something akin to the English Football League System of promotion and regulation in the NBA (and all sports) but there's just not enough to do it. Oh well.
 
BatiGOOOOOOL said:
Because that's the whole idea the NBA has imprinted in everyone's mind. If it's not fast paced, high flying, trash talking, chest thumping basketball, then it's boring.

If someone has watched the Spurs play during this postseason and found them boring, then there's a big problem with the perception of the sport, because that's basketball at it's best on both ends of the floor. Too bad a league about basketball doesn't care enough about the game itself to highlight that.

I am going to ask you a question.. and answer honestly.. before the Spurs were good. Was it fun to watch the Utah Jazz? With Malone and Stockton..
 
Blackace said:
I am going to ask you a question.. and answer honestly.. before the Spurs were good. Was it fun to watch the Utah Jazz? With Malone and Stockton..

Spurs are still much more exciting than a 90 percent pick and roll offense (conservative estimate).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom