Shinobi said::lol
:lol So this is what it's all about? Still going on about "Pizza Gate"? The match where the Neville brothers used Reyes as a second football? The ridiculous dive from Rooney that somehow earned a penalty kick for one of the biggest, most hated cheats in EPL history (something you Mancs agree with now that he's no longer wearing red...gee, funny how that works!) Oh but since the ref didn't call any of that shit, then that was simply appropriate and classy play from you guys. :lol It happened three and a half ****ing years ago for ****'s sake...there's maybe four Arsenal players left from that lineup that's still with the squad. Maybe you're still bitter that despite ending our streak, beating us twice, and playing us off the park in Cardiff, you still finished behind us in the league and had to watch us lift the FA Cup in your sorry faces with tears welling up in your eyes. Either way, you really need to get over it...in the current scheme of things, that Arsenal squad isn't even relevant anymore. Hell, Wenger and Fergie are actually semi-complimentary of each other these days, something that didn't even occur in private back then. Concentrate all you hate on Chelsea...in case you haven't realized, they're your biggest (only) threat at the moment.
In other news, Eto'os been making noise about having a desire to play in the EPL if he were to leave Barca, with Chelsea and Arsenal being teams that have caught his eye the last few months (but not Man U? Huh?). As I said before, the only way we get him is if we're swapping Henry and getting ten mill back in return. And unless Henry's injury problems are a long term issue, I'd rather keep him than Ego'o, er Eto'o.
bud said:what's the latest word on henry?
Ryck said:Sometimes I totally agree with you and you are totally on point ( Champions league stuff you said a few weeks back) but when your off, your really really off... and for some reason your always off when it comes to Arsenal. Maybe its dealing with reasonably nice Arsenal supporters ( namely my in laws who are all gooners) but I really don't hate Arsenal or even Liverpool in fact the only team in the epl I hate is Chelsea but even then I dunno some of this soap opera he said this, no he said bullshit is just rediculous and is imo the side of sports that is shameful and pointless.
as I said, I don't need to get over anything because Utd often come out of these ugly encounters better off, while Arsenal are the ones who resemble childish petulant kids.
hadareud said:If I may say so kaizoku, you're problem is that you are a little paranoid and take things too personally. You are talking about spicing things up, but as soon as somebody responds to you in a piss taking manner you get all defensive and think that everybody is insinuating that you are an idiot. I don't think that's the case at all.
And even if it were - you shouldn't give a ****. It's not like you seem unable to defend yourself.
I can't speak for anyone else, but I think the conversation in this thread is very civil (especially since the topic is football), and I don't think there's any hatred for any poster here. I'd be very surprised if there was.
kaizoku said:when I get bored of you gooners I'll move onto that liverpool fanbut i dunno he seems much more delicate than you guys.
DCharlie said:... holy shit, did a man utd fan just call another teams players petulant kids?
****ing hell ...
Its wrong to have an unlimited warchest in the transfer market. Chelsea have so much money that they can buy players just so no one esle can. Did Chelsea really need ballack? Not really, they only bought him because they knew that United were interested. Did chelsea need Wright Philips? Not at all. They already had duff, robben and cole, who are reagrded as some of the best wingers in the world, they didnt need to add another winger to the squad. They only did it because ASrsenal were showing interest.ElyrionX said:If there's something I don't get, it would be all the hate for Chelsea. It really sounds like everyone's hate for Chelsea stems completely from jealousy and nothing else. I mean, if Abramovich were to acquire your club and give it a virtually unlimited warchest in the transfer market, would you end up hating the man and lament the situation that your club have ended up in?
In recent years we have behaved better than most teams, but we've had our very bad moments when it comes to conduct. Several seasons ago our players looked like they were going to stab Andy D'urso for giving a decision against united. Poor behaviour doesnt occur too much from United players, but we've been very guilty of it in the past.kaizoku said:who do you support then?
Man Utd players are taught to behave with class and dignity on and off the pitch. this does not exclude passion or emotions...but for the large part I cant complain about our conduct.
well, not everything needs to be explained though. I hated Chelsea for as long as I can think back, certainly since I first became interested in English football and quite possibly even longer than that, probably for around 12 or 14 years. Believe me, when my dislike for Chelsea developed it was most certainly not out of jealousy. Of course their current success doesn't make things easier, but I wouldn't necessarily call that jealousy.ElyrionX said:If there's something I don't get, it would be all the hate for Chelsea. It really sounds like everyone's hate for Chelsea stems completely from jealousy and nothing else. I mean, if Abramovich were to acquire your club and give it a virtually unlimited warchest in the transfer market, would you end up hating the man and lament the situation that your club have ended up in?
I lived in stockport, which is actually a city fan area, but my house was just a corner away from burnage, which is a united fan area. I grew up at the time when Manchester United were a very dominant side, so most kids were supporting Manchester United. All my friends were united fans, so they are the ones that influenced me the most to become a united fan.hadareud said:That brings up an interesting point: how did you people become fans of your team? Can you explain it? If you're from Manchester, why do you support Man Utd and not City? Why Arsenal and not Tottenham etc.?
hadareud said:That brings up an interesting point: how did you people become fans of your team? Can you explain it? If you're from Manchester, why do you support Man Utd and not City? Why Arsenal and not Tottenham etc.?
Cincinnati Reds - I lived in Dayton, 45 minutes north of Cincy during the Big Red Machine days.hadareud said:That brings up an interesting point: how did you people become fans of your team? Can you explain it? If you're from Manchester, why do you support Man Utd and not City? Why Arsenal and not Tottenham etc.?
That would be an interesting discussion, maybe somebody wants to start ...
hadareud said:That brings up an interesting point: how did you people become fans of your team? Can you explain it? If you're from Manchester, why do you support Man Utd and not City? Why Arsenal and not Tottenham etc.?
That would be an interesting discussion, maybe somebody wants to start ...
That's cool you brought this up - I was going to ask this question sooner or later anyway. I played a lot of football (errr, soccer) growing up here in California. I was in high school during the World Cup in 1994 and got to watch a couple games at Stanford. One of my best friends that I played football with spent a year in North London when his dad was working at a hospital there, so he ended up being a Spurs fan. After the World Cup, he encouraged me to pick a team from England to support. I asked him who Dennis Bergkamp played for (since I was impressed by the way he played for Holland during the World Cup), and he explained that he had just moved to Arsenal. So I've been an Arsenal fan ever since, and he and I don't speak for a while after North London derby matches. :lolhadareud said:That brings up an interesting point: how did you people become fans of your team? Can you explain it? If you're from Manchester, why do you support Man Utd and not City? Why Arsenal and not Tottenham etc.?
Arsenal.com said:Henry fit enough to start against PSV Eindhoven
Champions League
Arsenal v PSV Eindhoven
Champions League Round 2 Leg 2
By Richard Clarke
Thierry Henry will be fit enough to start Arsenals crucial Champions League tie with PSV Eindhoven at Emirates Stadium on Wednesday.
The French striker has been struggling for some time with back and foot problems but he came through a training session on Tuesday morning. Afterwards his manager suggested he would be involved.
He can play, said Arsène Wenger at his pre-match press conference. He trained this morning and he can start if I decide to start him. There is no risk for his health or medical problems. Just a risk that it gets a bit worse after the game and you have to start from scratch again.
He did not practice for two weeks but he did a few gym sessions without running so I dont think he missed too much.
Kolo Toure and Emmanuel Adebayor will be available despite being in the middle of domestic bans. Abou Diaby is in the squad after recovering from an ankle problem. Philippe Senderos is the only fresh injury. The Swiss defender is out afer hurting his hamstring.
For the record, the current injury list is Justin Hoyte (hamstring), Mathieu Flamini (foot), Emmanuel Eboue (ankle), Tomas Rosicky (groin) and Robin van Persie (foot).
It'll be interesting to see what Wenger does. As far as I can remember, Henry doesn't typically play that while when he's injured or coming off the bench, so it's a risk putting him out there. But as you say, it's probably a risk worth taking given what he's capable of.Mama Smurf said:I meant to comment on that Henry thing earlier, when there was a risk that if he did play, he could make the injury worse.
That's got to be worth the risk. The CL is really all that's left for Arsenal this year, they lost to the winners of the league cup, lost to the winners of the FA Cup and aren't going to win the title. With or without Henry they'll be fine qualifying for the CL next year, so this is probably the most important game of their season right now.
Who would you start alongside Adebayor if Henry can't play? Baptista? Aliadiere? Walcott? No one? Just curious...hadareud said:That's what I hope anyway. Now that Adebayor can play I don't think he should start Henry if he's not absolutely certain that nothing bad comes from it.
Hmm, good question. Since we absolutely have to win I'm quite sure we'll start with 2 upfront.Cornballer said:Who would you start alongside Adebayor if Henry can't play? Baptista? Aliadiere? Walcott? No one? Just curious...
I agree on Baptista, but as Hadareud pointed out, he might be tired out after all of the recent games. I do feel like if his touch ever starts working (again?) he's going to be a very dangerous player.Mama Smurf said:I'd play Baptista. He makes me laugh, sometimes his touch and choices are terrible, but I guarantee if you played him every game, he'd get at least 15 goals a season. I find Aliadiere plays consistently at an okay level, but Baptista can either be way above Aliadiere's level or below it depending on the day. Take the risk...if Henry isn't playing.
:lol Me too. I like adding extra syllables: Alialialiadiere.I love saying Aliadiere. He's replaced Makelele.
cybamerc said:Liverpool plays more defensively than Chelsea has ever done. Such a shame that Barcelona has to lose to a bunch of cowards.