Tottenham are ready to match Blackburn's £15m valuation of David Bentley and bring the ex-Arsenal midfielder to White Hart Lane. (The Daily Express)
There's no "valuation". We haven't said £15m, that was Liverpool with Crouch. I don't believe we'd sell for that much unless Bentley really wanted out, and I'm not convinced he's going to really want out for anything other than a top 4 club.
Mentioning Liverpool, Benitez said this about Alonso, when asked if he would leave if Barry joins:
"He is our player, he has a contract. Barry can play in three different positions, so I don't think we need to worry about this."
He didn't outright say they wouldn't sell him, but it seems less likely than it did. It's weird though if they're not, the way he was sent on against Man City and the fans all stood up and cheered him really seemed like a goodbye.
And I don't like what he said about Barry. Yes, he can play lots of positions, but if you play him left back or left winger outside of an injury crisis, what a waste.
Ronok said:
Oh and does anyone else get pissed off with the buyout clause? I mean is there any point in a contract OVER 3 years anymore?
It's a pretty crappy clause, but the advantage of course of offering a 5 year contract over a 3 is that you at least get some money if they leave as they have to buy out their remaining wages. It's nothing compared to what you'd get for them with a normal transfer, generally, but it's still the reason to get them on board for more than 3 years.
hadareud said:
Nobody has used it yet though, since there's a gentlemen's agreement between the clubs to not use it. Players do threaten to use it though. Let's see who will be the first one.
Well...no one's used it since Webster. That's when this whole thing came to light really, when he bought out his contract at Hearts to join Wigan. Hearts took him to court but lost.
psycho_snake said:
I dont think flamini and hleb are huge losses. Both of them are replaceable.
I disagree. Well, I don't disagree that they can be replaced with the right spending, but I think they're huge losses. Losing the best defensive central midfielder in the Premiership this year and and second best winger? That'd be terrible. Arsenal had most of the pieces of a complete side, there were just a few areas they could do with improving. Flamini and Hleb were two of those pieces. If they both go, they have to rebuild those positions again. Used to be I'd think Arsenal could do with a centre back, a world class keeper and an out and out winger. Now I'm thinking centre back, world class keeper, out and out winger, Flamini replacement, Hleb replacement.
They can recover from it, if it does happen, of course they can. But it's two big steps back in my opinion. I think any side in the world would reel from the losses of those two.
I suppose the only upside to it would be an even better chance of Walcott starting regularly.