harSon said:I mean the call where he had complete control of the ball as it touched the ground. Everyone but Jaguar fans know what the call should have been.
So you mean when Wilford had possession?
harSon said:I mean the call where he had complete control of the ball as it touched the ground. Everyone but Jaguar fans know what the call should have been.
harSon said:I mean the call where he had complete control of the ball as it touched the ground. Everyone but Jaguar fans know what the call should have been.
eznark said:You learn a lot about an individuals character when they are forced to deal publicly with loss.
Tamanon said:So you mean when Wilford had possession?
eznark said:I missed the play but since you have yet to be rational, I'm just going to assume you're full of it.
:lolpxleyes said:Unless it's the SEC or Pac-101 dude!
harSon said:I'm not the only bitter person in the topic. You can see what losing a game does to you, just look back to when the Steelers took the lead. The Jaguar fan's attitudes were soooooooo different right?
BlueTsunami said:The reciever used the ground to scoop the ball up. It was Incomplete
Archaix said:The Holmes play absolutely should have been a catch, he didn't use the ground for anything. It was a poor call, but had no impact on the game anyway because they just made up the yardage on the next pass.
you guys played well tonight dude, i understand what you're pissed about. The pats gets away with a lot of shit and i always complain about that. But when it comes down to it the refs are completely blind. :/harSon said:I mean the call where he had complete control of the ball as it touched the ground. Everyone but Jaguar fans know what the call should have been.
BlueTsunami said:Not sure, I still think it was incomplete but the play being nullified by the next play makes arguing over it pretty pointless![]()
harSon said:I'll walk away with my tail between my leg but believe me when I say I cannot wait for next week. Cocky Jaguar fans will be eating a healthy portion of Sauteed Crow. Until then I will simply say congratulations on your impressive win*
eznark said:You could be a man about it. Bitching about officials on the intertubes isn't going to change the outcome (unless I do it next Saturday).
After today, if they want to lose by less than 10 points, Garrard has to be ACE. That is, everything has to go right. No slip-ups.topsyturvy said:not so fast.....waaaaaaaay back in week 5 i called jacksonville beating the pats at home and in the playoffs.![]()
harSon said:I'll walk away with my tail between my leg but believe me when I say I cannot wait for next week. Cocky Jaguar fans will be eating a healthy portion of Sauteed Crow, I'm quite sure of it. Until then I will simply say congratulations on your impressive win*
>.>harSon said:I'll walk away with my tail between my leg but believe me when I say I cannot wait for next week. Cocky Jaguar fans will be eating a healthy portion of Sauteed Crow, I'm quite sure of it. Until then I will simply say congratulations on your impressive win*
I hate the mindset that refs should call less during the playoffs (especially the deeper it gets) because it somehow makes people think the teams are less "high level". Happens almost every game this time of the season.topsyturvy said:you guys played well tonight dude, i understand what you're pissed about. The pats gets away with a lot of shit and i always complain about that. But when it comes down to it the refs are completely blind. :/
to be honest, Garrard played like complete shit. I was leaning towards the running game. :lolThe Stealth Fox said:After today, if they want to lose by less than 10 points, Garrard has to be ACE. That is, everything has to go right. No slip-ups.
harSon said:I'll walk away with my tail between my leg but believe me when I say I cannot wait for next week. Cocky Jaguar fans will be eating a healthy portion of Sauteed Crow, I'm quite sure of it. Until then I will simply say congratulations on your impressive win*
harSon said:I agree I'm a poor sport, I don't like to lose and that carries into all activities in my life. It's quite obvious that a good portion of those laughing at me would be in the very same situation, bitching and all, if the Jaguars had lost the game. Deny it all you want but the glimpses of a total melt down can be seen only a few pages back.
DarienA said:just... wow....
You really think any of us have delusions about actually beating New England? :lol God you are a joke.harSon said:I'll walk away with my tail between my leg but believe me when I say I cannot wait for next week. Cocky Jaguar fans will be eating a healthy portion of Sauteed Crow, I'm quite sure of it. Until then I will simply say congratulations on your impressive win*
pxleyes said:You really think any of us have delusions about actually beating New England? :lol God you are a joke.
pxleyes said:You really think any of us have delusions about actually beating New England? :lol God you are a joke.
Archaix said:He does have a point. There were people talking about how the Steelers had the refs in their back pockets for a comeback win. This is why people need to shut up and take my stance of "The refs didn't make you lose, you did. Shut up and put on your big boy pants."
That, of course, includes any Steelers fan whining about calls.
pxleyes said:You really think any of us have delusions about actually beating New England? :lol God you are a joke.
i don't dislike any team but the pats and i'm not exactly a fan of the jags. the only reason i rooted for them is because i see them giving the pats a better game. :/harSon said:I agree I'm a poor sport, I don't like to lose and that carries into all activities in my life. It's quite obvious that a good portion of those laughing at me would be in the very same situation, bitching and all, if the Jaguars had lost the game. Deny it all you want but the glimpses of a total melt down can be seen only a few pages back.
i do :/pxleyes said:You really think any of us have delusions about actually beating New England? :lol God you are a joke.
The proverbial us was us jag fans, not us everyone on this board.harSon said:Do I really need to go through the last few threads and come up with a list?
I do too, and of course I'll be rooting for them, but I'm not going to get worked up if the jags get beat. I just want to keep it respectable.eznark said:I'm no Jags fan, but I like the way they match up. I think they have a punchers chance.
Yeah, I agree. If teams like Philly and Baltimore can push New England to the brink, I can see the Jags having a chance.eznark said:I'm no Jags fan, but I like the way they match up. I think they have a punchers chance.
Rodeo Clown said:Yeah, I agree. If teams like Philly and Baltimore can push New England to the brink, I can see the Jags having a chance.
Don't worry we still have the Penspurg3 said:
BrandNew said:Well, any team can beat New England. But Pittsburgh probably is the least likely, next to maybe San Diego or the Titans.
edit: I mean in the playoffs that is
DarienA said:The Ravens showed if you can constantly put pressure on Brady from different directions you can get to him.... problem was the Ravens offense was incapable of scoring... The Giants did it better and could score... but they also showed.... you can't make ANY mistakes.
harSon said:Bias aside, I honestly think the Steelers would have had a better chance. The Patriots will stack the box, making their offense one-dimensional, and cause Garrard to win the game. Something that he cannot do IMO. The Steelers, while inconsistent, has a much better chance in a shootout.
eznark said:No one can beat New England in a shoot out. The complete lack of a running game would have totally doomed the Steelers.
its forecast to snow near boston next sunday...running will be a major priority. :/harSon said:The Colts most certainly can. And I didn't say the Steelers would win it, I said they have a better chance in a passing oriented game.