• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Official NFL Playoffs thread - Why bother, just give the Pats the trophy edition

Status
Not open for further replies.
I agree with Patriots fans when they say it is all about Championships.

That is why Bart Starr is the greatest quarterback who has ever lived.
 
Big-E said:
A QB's job is to win the game by passing the ball. How can Brady not be a great passer? Brady isn't running the ball to victory. You point out his stats like they are no where as good as the others when he is not much behind.

No shit he's not running the ball to victory, now your argument is getting retarded. If you really think his stats are comparable, take away each of those guys best years and you'll see how lopsided it is.

Brady - 17715 yds - 129 TDs
Marino - 21904 yds - 156 TDs
Favre - 19769 yds - 170 TDs
Manning - 20864 yds - 152 TDs

He's 2000 yards short of the lowest yards (Favre) and 23 TDs short of the lowest TD total (Manning). Even then the guy he's closest in each beats him significantly in the other category. Favre beats him by 41 TDs and Manning has ~3000 more yards.

Done arguing with you guys, Brady is a winner, probably the greatest ever by the time all is said and done. Unless he keeps up 30+ TDs and 4000 yds for another 5-6 no way will his name come up with the all time passers though. That's probably a good thing though since these guys don't win many championships if any at all.
 
J2 Cool said:
Sorry, I thought a quarterback's job was to win? Fuck no? If you want to judge quarterbacks/best passers by satistics, then go ahead and take Manning. But we've all seen them head to head many times. I think we know who's better. To me, pure statistics don't mean much. It's about the quality of the pass, not the quanity. Brady's made so many big throws in his career. Basically, you're suggesting he throw in garbage time for the rest of his career, just to satisfy guys like you in the stat category. That is such a horrible manipulation of stats, in the argument of "best quarterback of all-time". It's got so little to do with the answer to that question when it comes to doing the job of a quarterback. You would have a better argument if you were supporting the best TD to INT ratio statistics instead.
but yet number of super bowl rings is? Number of wins is? I mean sure passing yards isn't the end all stat, and none of us has said it was. How about seasons with a passing rating over 90? Favre has eight of those. How about years with TDs 30 or more? Eight more. Years with tards per average over 7? 8. Years with over 300 completions? Every year he's started. are any one of these stats indicative of him being one of the best out there? No, of course not.. but taken as a whole, they paint a picture of one of the best out there.

Is Brady going to get there? Maybe.... but aside from his win/loss record there is nothing indicating that it's guaranteed. That's all anyone's saying. It's real easy to get behind a Michael Vick, a Kordell Stewart, a Kurt Warner, etc as the greatest quarterback ever because they put up the numbers for a half dozen years give or take. It's another thing to see a QB go the distance. Put in 10, 12, or 15 years and have the numbers AND wins to show for it.

I stand behind what I say. It's way too early to be calling Brady one of the greats, plain and simple. Christ, the guy hasn't even finished his 7th starting year. If he keeps up this output for another 5+ years go ahead and call him one of the greats, I'll be there right with you. But on the other side of that coin we've seen QBs stay healthy and still drop or level off in productivity after 4-5 years. If he avoids that, he'll be one of the greats. If he succumbs to it, he'll still be a great QB. But at 7 years in it's WAY too early to be calling it.
 
TheDrizzlerJ11 said:
and that isnt very fair for those who continued to play past their prime, Im sure bradys will be similiar by the end of his career.


Dan Marino's highest interception totals all occurred before he hit 30.
 
el Diablo said:
No shit he's not running the ball to victory, now your argument is getting retarded. If you really think his stats are comparable, take away each of those guys best years and you'll see how lopsided it is.

Brady - 17715 yds - 129 TDs
Marino - 21904 yds - 156 TDs
Favre - 19769 yds - 170 TDs
Manning - 20864 yds - 152 TDs

He's 2000 yards short of the lowest yards (Favre) and 23 TDs short of the lowest TD total (Manning). Even then the guy he's closest in each beats him significantly in the other category. Favre beats him by 41 TDs and Manning has ~3000 more yards.

Done arguing with you guys, Brady is a winner, probably the greatest ever by the time all is said and done. Unless he keeps up 30+ TDs and 4000 yds for another 5-6 no way will his name come up with the all time passers though. That's probably a good thing though since these guys don't win many championships if any at all.

What the hell kind of butchering of stats is that? Did you take each of their first 6 years in the league or what?

EDIT: You are still using yardage which means jack shit as a passer.
 
Listen... I used to be a non-Brady believer myself until they were put so "gracefully" on the public stage every fucking week during MNF or FNiA... or whatever...

Basically... I've never seen ANYONE so comfortable in the pocket in my life. Watch him play. The greatest players in any sport see the game in slow motion....... you watch him fucking play the game and tell me he's not in slow-mo watching his receivers. It's remarkable how calm he is and... well... all you need to do is look at last week's stats to even further the point. Really... last week seals it for me. Ok... Jax didn't blitz... but... christ this man executes like NONE OTHER.

He's awesome. He's great. He's easily one of the best playoff quarterbacks of all time... if not ever... and time will prove this. The man eats playoff games for breakfast.
 
el Diablo said:
No shit he's not running the ball to victory, now your argument is getting retarded. If you really think his stats are comparable, take away each of those guys best years and you'll see how lopsided it is.

Brady - 17715 yds - 129 TDs
Marino - 21904 yds - 156 TDs
Favre - 19769 yds - 170 TDs
Manning - 20864 yds - 152 TDs

He's 2000 yards short of the lowest yards (Favre) and 23 TDs short of the lowest TD total (Manning). Even then the guy he's closest in each beats him significantly in the other category. Favre beats him by 41 TDs and Manning has ~3000 more yards.

Done arguing with you guys, Brady is a winner, probably the greatest ever by the time all is said and done. Unless he keeps up 30+ TDs and 4000 yds for another 5-6 no way will his name come up with the all time passers though. That's probably a good thing though since these guys don't win many championships if any at all.No shit he's not running the ball to victory, now your argument is getting retarded. If you really think his stats are comparable, take away each of those guys best years and you'll see how lopsided it is.

Brady - 17715 yds - 129 TDs
Marino - 21904 yds - 156 TDs
Favre - 19769 yds - 170 TDs
Manning - 20864 yds - 152 TDs

He's 2000 yards short of the lowest yards (Favre) and 23 TDs short of the lowest TD total (Manning). Even then the guy he's closest in each beats him significantly in the other category. Favre beats him by 41 TDs and Manning has ~3000 more yards.

Done arguing with you guys, Brady is a winner, probably the greatest ever by the time all is said and done. Unless he keeps up 30+ TDs and 4000 yds for another 5-6 no way will his name come up with the all time passers though. That's probably a good thing though since these guys don't win many championships if any at all.

I don't think you understand football very much. Do you watch a lot of it? I've watched a lot of Aikman games. Tons of Montana. I even watch quite a few classic's from the 70's

Brady is in total command and his passes are many times, perfect. All I'm saying is I haven't seen a QB this good. Ever.

You can throw numbers at me all day, it won't matter
 
Big-E said:
What the hell kind of butchering of stats is that? Did you take each of their first 6 years in the league or what?

EDIT: You are still using yardage which means jack shit as a passer.

No i took their 6 best years, threw out their very best and totaled it. Looking for consistancy over an extended time period not a number inflated by a huge 1 year spike. Or should i just judge a QB by his best 1 or 2 years and then talk about them as being great QBs? Cause if you do that there are alot of guys who put up some monster years over a short period of time.

What numbers should be used then? Let me guess TD's aren't important? How few INT's you throw is the most important? Completions? Incompletions? Completion %? Attempts? What? If you tell me QB rating then that shows how much of a joke this is. How else do you judge how a guy passed the football if you don't use stats? Wins certainly don't judge how a guy passed the ball, since the passing game is only part of the equation of a win.

Cooter said:
I don't think you understand football very much. Do you watch a lot of it? I've watched a lot of Aikman games. Tons of Montana. I even watch quite a few classic's from the 70's

Brady is in total command and his passes are many times, perfect. All I'm saying is I haven't seen a QB this good. Ever.

You can throw numbers at me all day, it won't matter

Yawn, so now i haven't seen much or know much lol. So as much football as you've seen, you've never heard an analyst refer to a QB as a pure passer? And no i won't throw numbers at you anymore, obviously you don't get it.
 
el Diablo said:
What numbers should be used then? Let me guess TD's aren't important? How few INT's you throw is the most important? Completions? Incompletions? Completion %? Attempts? What? If you tell me QB rating then that shows how much of a joke this is. How else do you judge how a guy passed the football if you don't use stats? Wins certainly don't judge how a guy passed the ball, since the passing game is only part of the equation of a win.

Yardage is not one of them. A poster gave you INT stats for the four with Brady coming out the best. You seem to focus only on yardage and TD's. If you can show more stats to try and prove your point further then go ahead. Using yardage won't get it done.
 
Montana was better than Brady. He also played in an era where the rules were not completely written to favor the offense.

If you took that Niners team and let them play in this era that favors passing it is scary to think of what numbers they could put up. It seems every 3 or 4 years a new offensive record is set. That isn't because Randall Cunnigham is the greatest qb to ever play, but because with the new rules if you have a good offensive line and receivers it is literally impossible to defend against.

Edit: Why is that all Cowboy fans also seem to be riding Brady's jock?
 
Im still representing the Cowboys son.

Today I wore my Aikman jersey and tomorrow im wearing my Barber III one.


**** the manning family.


LORD BRADY, OMG, I am a witness....God walks on Earth and he is among us, he doesnt preach, he throws TD passes.
 
Bezz said:
Im still representing the Cowboys son.

Today I wore my Aikman jersey and tomorrow im wearing my Barber III one.


**** the manning family.


LORD BRADY, OMG, I am a witness....God walks on Earth and he is among us, he doesnt preach, he throws TD passes.
Hey Bezz...

How does it feel? Lost to the Giants, lost to the worst QB in the league Eli Manning... must really suck.
 
Gotta say, I'm sad to be going against Wellington this week. He's been one of the few guys who was still respectful of the Packers toward the beginning:lol

Also, jesus, I don't know whats worse anymore; Brady haters or Brady worshippers.
 
Brady is just a flat out great QB. Since stats matter so much to some, by the end of his career he'll most likely be top 10 in every major QB passing category and that's damn good. Not to mention he'll probably add 2 or 3 more super bowl rings under his belt.

I like watching the guy play, just like I watch Peyton Manning play. Just great QB's all around. I'd consider the two some of the best of all time already. My favorite QB of all time is Dan Marino, he was my idol for a major portion of my life. I regard him as the best QB ever through tremendously high bias. But Brady, when its all said and done, will probably un-seat Marino for that spot to many people, and deservedly so.
 
Artie said:
Gotta say, I'm sad to be going against Wellington this week. He's been one of the few guys who was still respectful of the Packers toward the beginning:lol

Also, jesus, I don't know whats worse anymore; Brady haters or Brady worshippers.

Depends on what you qualify as 'Brady haters.' I don't see so much Brady hating as I see 'he's good but not THAT good.' I mean, there's bionic sure, but he's got a shtick to keep up :P
 
bionic77 said:
There is a strong correlation between Brady worshippers and Al Queda.

i also heard that one of the ideals that al queda is fighting for is to erase MJ (the real 23) from all the record books. hmmmm
 
jman2050 said:
Ah, but 12 reversed is 21, which happens to be Sean Taylor's number. Is THAT coincidence?!?!
Well considering the NFL handled a former player getting killed fighting terrorists in a much shittier way than they did for a guy who got killed by a bunch of punk kids I'd say no, that's no coincidence.
 
Artie said:
Gotta say, I'm sad to be going against Wellington this week. He's been one of the few guys who was still respectful of the Packers toward the beginning:lol

Also, jesus, I don't know whats worse anymore; Brady haters or Brady worshippers.
Hey man Favre gifted my boy the season sack record. ;)
 
I agree that Joe Montana is still a better "winner" QB than Brady, but that's pretty much unfair. Brady is still really good, but I can't think of a single bad playoff game Montana ever had, while Brady has actually had a few bad playoff games. That said, Brady/Peyton are probably going to be 1a and 1b of their generation of QBs, honestly a lot like the Montana/Marino comparison, but not quite on that level.
 
A lot of you guys are jokes. I hate NE but Brady is top 3 in the history of the game easy. When you need him the guy is money. Manning has better stats in the regular season, but Brady's playoff stats and leadership abilities are head and shoulders above Manning, Favre, Marino, Moon, and who ever else you want to name. Shit, I would take Simms and Troy over the guys I listed and the guys people have compared Brady to.

Firex I hope someone steps up and keeps Manning from being the second greatest qb of this generation. The guy has yet to have a great playoff game and was carried to last years sb win.
 
FrenchMovieTheme said:
it will confirm to me that there is no heaven and that we are all merely energy condensed to a slow vibration. That we are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively. There is no such thing as death, life is only a dream, and we are the imagination of ourselves.

Here's Tom with the weather!
 
Hunter D said:
A lot of you guys are jokes. I hate NE but Brady is top 3 in the history of the game easy. When you need him the guy is money. Manning has better stats in the regular season, but Brady's playoff stats and leadership abilities are head and shoulders above Manning, Favre, Marino, Moon, and who ever else you want to name. Shit, I would take Simms and Troy over the guys I listed and the guys people have compared Brady to.

Firex I hope someone steps up and keeps Manning from being the second greatest qb of this generation. The guy has yet to have a great playoff game and was carried to last years sb win.

Okay, seriously, YOU'RE the joke around here.
 
Hunter D said:
You're saying Manning is bigger game than Simms and Aikman? Really? Phil Simms was probably the toughest qb to ever play the game.

Simms and Aikman better than Marino, Manning and Favre? Who's your connect I need to try some of the shit your on :lol
 
Tom Penny said:
Simms and Aikman better than Marino, Manning and Favre? Who's your connect I need to try some of the shit your on :lol
Aikman and Simms have come up bigger than all the guys I listed. Simms played behind some terrible pass blocking lines and still lead the Giants to the playoffs multiple times. The shit that guys fall apart over now are things Simms would have laughed off.
 
BudokaiMR2 said:
I just heard what happened to the Cowboys.

:(

Stupid manning family.
Yeah. It's a real bummer. HEY, did you hear the other big news? Sean Taylor died. The NFC East can't win for losing.
 
Hunter D said:
A lot of you guys are jokes. I hate NE but Brady is top 3 in the history of the game easy. When you need him the guy is money. Manning has better stats in the regular season, but Brady's playoff stats and leadership abilities are head and shoulders above Manning, Favre, Marino, Moon, and who ever else you want to name. Shit, I would take Simms and Troy over the guys I listed and the guys people have compared Brady to.

Firex I hope someone steps up and keeps Manning from being the second greatest qb of this generation. The guy has yet to have a great playoff game and was carried to last years sb win.

Manning 27/33 457 4td 1int

Peyton Manning's Career Post-Season Stats

He had a good game against the Patriots last year, especially second half. His stats aren't that bad. He's had some really good playoff games and some bad ones. I don't think he's nearing all-time though.
 
I laughed at this

romoofthelostark.png
 
Hunter D said:
Simms played behind some terrible pass blocking lines and still lead the Giants to the playoffs multiple times. The shit that guys fall apart over now are things Simms would have laughed off.

Jeff Hostetler say, "Hey, remember me?"

It's hard to argue for Simms when his backup won the last five games, including the Super Bowl, of the 1990 season. Simms is a damn good quarterback, but he really shouldn't be brought up along with the great QBs of the last twenty years.
 
Dammit, if only the NFC Championship game was on NBC. Could have played a drinking game... every time Madden says how good Favre is, you take a shot!









You'd be dead by halftime.
 
Apple Jax said:
Listen... I used to be a non-Brady believer myself until they were put so "gracefully" on the public stage every fucking week during MNF or FNiA... or whatever...

Basically... I've never seen ANYONE so comfortable in the pocket in my life. Watch him play. The greatest players in any sport see the game in slow motion....... you watch him fucking play the game and tell me he's not in slow-mo watching his receivers. It's remarkable how calm he is and... well... all you need to do is look at last week's stats to even further the point. Really... last week seals it for me. Ok... Jax didn't blitz... but... christ this man executes like NONE OTHER.

He's awesome. He's great. He's easily one of the best playoff quarterbacks of all time... if not ever... and time will prove this. The man eats playoff games for breakfast.

You fucking nailed it dude. I was really fucking worried the first season that Brady was put to play because I was like "Drew Bledsoe has the best fucking arm in the NFL, it is fucking powerful, it is like Tecmo Super Bowl throwing it 100 yards shit" but then when he it just fucking fit. Brady was calm and precise. It was like watching a samurai version of a football player. It was fucking bizarre. When you watch a highlights reel and they had to show the 2 times that Tom Brady didn't make a completion and in a playoffs game against the Jaguars' defense, you know you are watching one of the motherfucking greatest. And those incompletes weren't even his fault, they just lost it. It is unreal.
 
Phil Simms was probably the toughest qb to ever play the game.

Simms, who missed the important games of his lone Super Bowl and only played 4 full 16 game seasons is tougher than Brett Favre, who has played 16 straight full seasons (well, his first year was only 15 games).

I think that officially ends the intelligent debate.

Bart Starr's 7 NFL championships win the day.

EDIT: That should say many, not "the" in reference to the games Simms missed in 86, since he obviously played (and played excellently) in the playoffs.
 
eznark said:
Simms, who missed the important games of his lone Super Bowl and only played 4 full 16 game seasons is tougher than Brett Favre, who has played 16 straight full seasons (well, his first year was only 15 games).

I think that officially ends the intelligent debate.

Bart Starr's 7 NFL championships win the day.

EDIT: That should say many, not "the" in reference to the games Simms missed in 86, since he obviously played (and played excellently) in the playoffs.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_Bowl_XXI

New York quarterback Phil Simms was named the Super Bowl MVP, finishing the game with 22 of 25 passes completed for 268 yards and three touchdowns. Simms also had 25 rushing yards on 3 carries. His 22 out of 25 (88%) completion percentage not only set a Super Bowl record, but also an NFL postseason record for 21 years

That record was just broken by Tom Brady on Saturday, by the way.

Just a *little* bit of fact checking goes a long way towards credibility. The second super bowl by the Giants was the one with Hostetler.

That said, I don't disagree that Favre is the toughest QB ever.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom