giants will most likely wear white and patriots will wear blue
:lol
Karakand said:I was wrong
It was Eli all along!
![]()
:lol
Karakand said:I was wrong
It was Eli all along!
![]()
Hitokage said:Year Peyton made it to the big game: 9th as pro.
Year Eli made it: 4th
grossman didn't last year either. Except until the superbowl. :/jman2050 said:Fun stat: Eli is the only starting QB out of 12 to NOT throw a pick in the postseason.
Talk about irony.
green bay was horrible dear god.topsyturvy said:i still would've prefer farve to go to the super bowl. I don't know why greenbay is so ineffective in below shitty weather.
(lets not kid ourselves here folks, weather beat them)
think about it.t4ng0 said:green bay was horrible dear god.
Hitokage said:Year Peyton made it to the big game: 9th as pro.
Year Eli made it: 4th
don't pull that card.ryutaro's mama said:
topsyturvy said:don't pull that card.
Eli just beat two 13-3 teams back to back.
peyton lost to shitty wild card teams that was the equivalent of tampa bay. :/
FrenchMovieTheme said:one day i will be where you are brother![]()
topsyturvy said:16-0 assured. Now that shit is just pitiful. Wtf nfl?
peyton and co. choked against teams he had no business losing to.ryutaro's mama said:Riiight...
So in the time frame of 9 years vs. 4, Peyton was playing shitty AFC teams in the playoffs?
understandable, I don't think anyone is saying eli is better then peyton. But all i'm saying is that peyton manning didn't get not one playoff win with awesome colts teams, whats so ever until the 06 campaign.ryutaro's mama said:All I'm saying is that when you start comparing comparing years pro before a Superbowl, remember that there are a lot of factors that go into the road to the SB.
Eli made it in 4, yes. Does that make him better than his brother? Time will tell.
Eli had a very good defense this year that in many was the difference this year for them.
I honestly couldn't care less who wins SB 42. But when you start comparing years it took, c'mon, that gets a little silly.
vas_a_morir said:I think Bradshaw IS the rookie of the year! He is the future of the Giants... for five years or so, as most runningbacks are out by then. Arrogant Pats fans tell me that they are going to find a way to get Chad Johnson. Pffft. You wish you could have the TRUE best receiver in the NFL. In reality, you don't need him, anyway.
rhfb said:I seriously hope the Giants CRUSH the Pats, but it isn't going to happen. The NFL wouldn't let it.
Considering I find APF a source of much amusement in the political threads, even when I disagree with him, I'll take that as a compliment.Tamanon said:Don't try arguing with branduil, he's the APF of sports fans.
Truer words have never been spoken.eznark said:Wellington, I don't think weather had a thing to do with yesterday's game. I've never seen Plaxico Burress play a better game in my life, and to say that he was able to beat up on Harris last night because of the weather does Plax a disservice. He was clearly the superior football player last night.
Clearly the team that played better won the game last night, nothing else to say.
We're all Giants fans now.
harris has always had problems against fast receivers, and last night burress was as fast as the best of them. favre was throwing some awful passes (though he was also throwing some good ones) and there were a couple of missed catches as well.eznark said:Wellington, I don't think weather had a thing to do with yesterday's game. I've never seen Plaxico Burress play a better game in my life, and to say that he was able to beat up on Harris last night because of the weather does Plax a disservice. He was clearly the superior football player last night.
Hitokage said:Year Peyton made it to the big game: 9th as pro.
Year Eli made it: 4th
Somebody mentioned that the high snap at the end that led to the botched FG attempt was Tony Romo's revenge, and then during the OT coin toss I predicted Packers would get it and we would see Matt Hasselbeck's revenge. It's nice to have a call go your way sometime.![]()
borghe said:harris has always had problems against fast receivers, and last night burress was as fast as the best of them. favre was throwing some awful passes (though he was also throwing some good ones) and there were a couple of missed catches as well.
but at the end of the day, the Giants played better, the pack had three MAJOR opportunities (2 missed FGs and winning the OT toss) and just couldn't capitalize. I said at the start of OT "All we need to do is move the ball 50 yards and kick a chip shot" and we just couldn't do it.
But unlike many packer post-season losses, this one was a little easier to swallow being that there were no bullshit calls, we were handed a lot of opportunities that we never did anything with, and it is without question this year that the (SURPRISINGLY) best team of the NFC is going to the super bowl. You just can't take away what the Giants have done in the last 10 games.
I do think though that the bottom line of the game is that the cold affected favre a hell of a lot more than Manning. I really didn't see that coming. But when you take the 92yd touchdown pass out of it, favre's numbers were miserable, which is to be expected in a severe conditions game, while manning's numbers were respectable for a regular weather game, and outstanding for a severe conditions game.
here's to hoping we get another chance with favre next year.
Oh, I normally don't advocate "Well, if this didn't happen they would have won the game". I agree with you that it's a stupid philosophy to approach. All I was saying was that, while the packers numbers looked ok, it was because of that ONE play that they looked ok. Without that one play their numbers would have been terrible, which then goes to explain a lot of what we saw. I'm not actually saying "If you take away that play then x". I am more or less just saying that one play skews a lot of our offensive numbers.. usually when you have plays like that you end up with just insane offensive yardage. With that play we ended up with just ok yardage.eznark said:I agree with all of that, but I never understood the "if you take xxx out of it" comments. That play did, in fact, happen. I mean shit, if you take the drive where the Packers defense lost it's mind and took stupid ass penalties out of it, they win the game. Sadly, that is not possible.
I wouldn't say Tampa Bay is one of the most vile. See, now you're just over-exaggerating..Nameless said:Giants are my honorary favorite team for today. They have vanquished the two most vile and evil teams in the history of sports, they should feel like super bowl champions already.
topsyturvy said:understandable, I don't think anyone is saying eli is better then peyton. But all i'm saying is that peyton manning didn't get not one playoff win with awesome colts teams, whats so ever until the 06 campaign.
Thats like basically eight cowboys 07 seasons. :/
eznark said:Wellington, I don't think weather had a thing to do with yesterday's game. I've never seen Plaxico Burress play a better game in my life, and to say that he was able to beat up on Harris last night because of the weather does Plax a disservice. He was clearly the superior football player last night.
Clearly the team that played better won the game last night, nothing else to say.
We're all Giants fans now.
My biggest complaint with Plax was that he never showed up in big games and the dropsies.Spectral Glider said:I was just about stunned by the way Plax played...his greatest game ever. I've dogged him in the past and I can't do it anymore. He dismantled Harris and got into his head, shades of Hines a little bit. And in the cold, he was catching the ball with his hands away from his body most of the time. A shame he didn't have a TD, but I'm sure he's happy as hell with a SB trip.
Big Zep said:Well lets just get one more thing clear...Eli will NEVER be better than Peyton. let me bold that shit
NEVER
New England is more vile and evil than 10 Dallas Cowboy teams and 15 Brett Farves!Nameless said:Giants are my honorary favorite team for today. They have vanquished the two most vile and evil teams in the history of sports, they should feel like super bowl champions already.
Tom Penny said:So if the Pats win the SB are they officially the greatest team ever and if the Giants beat them would that be the greatest SB upset of all time?
Funny i dont recall Peyton playing QB, Defense AND does the field goal kicking on the side. I must have fallen asleep during those games.topsyturvy said:peyton and co. choked against teams he had no business losing to.
Someone else with some sense.Spectral Glider said:What are you jabbering about?
http://www.pro-football-reference.co.../clt/#playoffs
The '02 blowout to the Jets was the only real inexcusable one. For three years running, '03-'05, they were ousted by the eventual Super Bowl winner. And then in '06 they put it all together. This year, had San Diego been healthy offensively, or maybe if Volek played a half even, they may have shocked the world. The Colts loss to them wasn't that crazy.
TheDrizzlerJ11 said:Tied. Remember what "Team" means. Dolphins did it with a back up QB.
They are tied with the best team ever.
Ninja Scooter said:the Dolphins also did it playing a schedule so easy it would make Ohio St. look good. '72 Phins=most overrated team ever. The 80s Niners, 90s Cowboys and current Pats would dismantle them, along with a number of other teams, would dismantle them if they ever played.
Check this out.Ninja Scooter said:lets be realistic. The Packers and Cowboys did a shit job of getting pressure on Eli. Belicheck is an defensive genius. He'll figure out a way to get it done. Hell, even during the regular season NE/NY game, once the Pats stopped playing around and actually started sending men at Eli in the 2nd half, it was the same old Eli being Eli. You guys can hold out hope, but the Pats are going to dismantle the Giants. Its destiny. My prediction: NE 31, NY 14
Here are some stats Jaworski gave me as researched by the crew from State Farm NFL Matchup (8:30 a.m. Sunday on ESPN):
In two playoff games, Eli Manning's statistics against blitzes are 14-for-15 for 171 yards and two TDs, with no interceptions. His rating is 153.8. "Incredible numbers,'' Jaworski said.
This might not matter Sunday, because the Packers don't blitz much. They came at the Giants six times in 42 dropbacks in Week 2.
Amani Toomer has been thrown to 12 times in the playoffs and caught 11 passes for 154 yards and three touchdowns. "Scary,'' Jaworski said.
Beating bump-and-run press coverage will be a key for the Giants. In Week 2, at least one and often two or three Packers corners set up in such coverage on 56 of 58 plays.