I actually dont think its THAT bad to go back to. The first person aiming is shit. But the driving and open world design really hold up imoGTA III, the game aged more than i'm willing to accept.
Agree with this. Sonic 2 and 3/Knuckles made a lot of good improvements, but the premise of going fast just doesn’t quite work in most 2D platform era.Sonic. The levels go out of their way to make sure you can’t go fast.
I saw a Magnum PI ferrari today... it was really dated...
Man shit just wasn't as cool as we thought they were at the time.
I wanted to like it. However, I guess I was expecting an action adventure game with exploration... and not a third person shooter.Okay I might have misunderstood the thread
I thought it was seen as a good enough game at the time
I actually dont think its THAT bad to go back to. The first person aiming is shit. But the driving and open world design really hold up imo
PS4 will age well in my opinion, as long as you can tolerate 30fps. Games like Spiderman and Uncharted 4 will never look and play bad.Every 3D game from PS1 and PS2 era and most 3D games from PS3 era. I feel like PS5 era will be the first 3D generation that will preserve really well from visual and gameplay perspective. Older games just don't look or play as good as we remember.
I agree about races feeling slippery, but I still love the music. Also, battle mode is still amazing with a friend!Mario Kart on the SNES. Loved it as a kid, went back to it a couple of years ago and... nope. Tracks are super short, the game feels "slippery" as hell, rubberband AI is whack, musical track loops are very short... etc.
It's a good concept that eventually led to the glorious, amazing game that is Mario Kart 8... but man, it's rough to go back to. (In fact I just play the SNES tracks on Mario Kart 8, instead of playing SNES Mario Kart).
We’ve said this time and time again, each generation.PS4 will age well in my opinion, as long as you can tolerate 30fps. Games like Spiderman and Uncharted 4 will never look and play bad.
Nearly everything from the PS1 / N64 era. Those titles have aged really poorly and even the best RPGs have simple, hamfisted storylines with primitive cutscenes.
We say that every gen and then after a while we look back and then those games just don't look as good, but I do agree that PS4 games overall should age ok. I just think by the time we get to PS6 we will probably have 120fps option in games and it will be very hard to go back to 30fps at that point.PS4 will age well in my opinion, as long as you can tolerate 30fps. Games like Spiderman and Uncharted 4 will never look and play bad.
With 2D graphics that happend around the 16bit generation, or with systems a little stronger than that, like the Neogeo.We’ve said this time and time again, each generation.
Prepare yourself, those games may start being called ugly sooner than you think.
Of course you're right about the music -- it's fantastic.I agree about races feeling slippery, but I still love the music. Also, battle mode is still amazing with a friend!
I think that really depends. There wasn't a blueprint on how to do controls for a shooter on consoles back then, so everyone did it differently.(shooters, hack and slash, fighters, etc)
Goldeneye 007.
Those controls do NOT hold up.
You can't fault it for that.
But, it even supports dual analog.
Great video on DF:You think Morrowind is rough these days?
Try playing Daggerfall.
The game may be a masterpiece but fuck me if it isn't a damn nightmare to play.
I think that really depends. There wasn't a blueprint on how to do controls for a shooter on consoles back then, so everyone did it differently.
Shooters that don't require much if any precise aiming like Alien Trilogy still play fine, maybe a little slow on the turning but definitely playable.
Games like Medal of Honor are a little harder to get into, I agree. As for fighters.. you mean stuff like Tekken? Yeah, I don't think so. I recently played Bloody Roar 2 and that game plays very well. Most 3D-Fighters are still like 2D-Fighters in most aspects. You may can sidestep, but other than that there isn't much of a difference.
This. The remake has nothing new except shinier graphics, and Blizzard can't wait to sell it for full price with 0 innovation just like WoW remastered.Diablo 2
I've been thinking about it since the remake announcement; Diablo 2 was great, probably one of the games I've spent the most time playing. But all the gameplay mechanics are super antiquated by today's standards, it has aged atrociously, and it's not a matter of shiny graphics (or lack thereof). I don't think I'd be able to enjoy the original anymore, nor the remake.