malingenie
Member
I will seriously consider suicide when "baldie" becomes a banned word. Speaking as a bald person. This exponential foray into Pc behavior is rustling my jimmies.
Okay, so banning retard will lead to the banning of baldie HAS to be a slippery slope fallacy, right?I will seriously consider suicide when "baldie" becomes a banned word. Speaking as a bald person. This exponential foray into Pc behavior is rustling my jimmies.
you know, it's easier to just not be offended by it.
If people dont get offended by being called something, then people dont call you that. I've never heard of someone getting angry because they were called a mountain lion, or a doctor.
"you're such a fucking doctor" for example, if you're not offended by it, who the fuck cares when someone calls you it. If enough people stop caring, then the word stops getting used.
Any word or phrase that accurately describes a diminished capacity for thought is not going to be very nice.How about not using it as an insult/code word for something bad, period.
the problem as i see it is that once you replace this word with another term, that term will eventually garner negative connotations and become as offensive and/or widely spread as the first term.
I'll be sure to tell my black friends not to be offended by "nigger." I'll stop being offended by "cunt." And I tell my gay friends to stop being offended by "faggot."
Any word or phrase that accurately describes a diminished capacity for thought is not going to be very nice.
How about not using it as an insult/code word for something bad, period.
Can we say the campaign and anyone supporting it is stupid? No, let's not do that because it would be offensive to legitimately stupid people. (def: lacking ordinary quickness and keenness of mind)
Ban it too. Let's ban all words and just sit in silence.
Can we say the campaign and anyone supporting it is stupid? No, let's not do that because it would be offensive to legitimately stupid people. (def: lacking ordinary quickness and keenness of mind)
Ban it too. Let's ban all words and just sit in silence.
Okay, so banning retard with lead to the banning of baldie HAS to be a slippery slope fallacy, right?
and here's a strawman
edit: no, intellectually challenged isn't an offensive phrase to me. that's the literal definition of what the struggle is.
Can we say the campaign and anyone supporting it is stupid? No, let's not do that because it would be offensive to legitimately stupid people. (def: lacking ordinary quickness and keenness of mind)
Ban it too. Let's ban all words and just sit in silence.
So the solution is to stop being a dick.
edit: I really don't care about it being banned or not. But I'm all for awareness.
Okay, so banning retard with lead to the banning of baldie HAS to be a slippery slope fallacy, right?
A strawman? He's directly on point. The problem is that people are going to say mean things about other people if they want to. "Retarded" isn't necessarily a worse word than "moron", "stupid", "idiot" or even "slow".
I'll be sure to tell my black friends not to be offended by "nigger." I'll stop being offended by "cunt." And I'll tell my gay friends to stop being offended by "faggot."
I think people are confused(or maybe Im confused)I will seriously consider suicide when "baldie" becomes a banned word. Speaking as a bald person. This exponential foray into Pc behavior is rustling my jimmies.
you know, it's easier to just not be offended by it.
If people dont get offended by being called something, then people dont call you that. I've never heard of someone getting angry because they were called a mountain lion, or a doctor.
"you're such a fucking doctor" for example, if you're not offended by it, who the fuck cares when someone calls you it. If enough people stop caring, then the word stops getting used.
The difference is that there's nothing inherently bad about being or appearing gay. But being or acting unintelligent is kind of a bummer. Retarded is a feel-bad label, and so is "intellectually disabled," and so is the next label they think of, no matter who it gets applied to.Thank you.
Using the word "retard" isn't a bad thing if A) used respectfully and B) the referent is actually mentally retarded. If it's used as an everyday insult (for instance: "that's so retarded") then yeah, I have issues with you (ambiguous you, that is). It's no different than saying "oh, that's so gay".
I think people are confused(or maybe Im confused)
Theyre banning the word retard for medical uses so you CAN use the word retard. You can say the word retard because it no longer refers to a medical condition. The same way 'dumb' no longer refers to people who cant speak(deaf, dumb, and blind) so now we can freely say it without insulting people who are mute.
"differently able" just seems like a dishonest term to me. I've got a family member who survived a terrible car crash but isn't able to speak, feed herself, or do much of anything now. She isn't "differently abled"; she became severally disabled. I guess "physically and mentally challenged" is a more positive spin to put on her situation. Obviously she wouldn't understand any label you might want to put on her, but I think "differently able" would make my relatives cringe more than "disabled" or "handicapped" ever would.I also don't think that "disabled" is a very good term for them, "differently able" is a much better term and probably better at boosting their self-confidence.
Well, alright. But a question: are there any derogatory words thrown at you that are associated with who you are?I know where you are coming from, i do... and i know my stance is illogical and childish, but dammit i lived my whole life being called names and calling people names... all i can say is deal with it. They are words. Offend me back if i offend you, or graciously take the joke. Maybe one day i will understand the need to ban words, but not tonight.
I think people are confused(or maybe Im confused)
Theyre banning the word retard for medical uses so you CAN use the word retard. You can say the word retard because it no longer refers to a medical condition. The same way 'dumb' no longer refers to people who cant speak(deaf, dumb, and blind) so now we can freely say it without insulting people who are mute(do they like being called 'mutes?')
If you don't care about offending people who would be offended at the word retarded - keep using the word retarded in any way you see fit. If you care about offending those people - don't use the word. It's the same argument for faggot. It's a slur, and it's used recreationally sometimes - and it can really hurt people.
I don't -need- to use the word, the word has no importance to me, I worry more about maybe offending those people. If you don't, that's your prerogative.
By itself? Sure. In usage, though, it's frequently a pejorative for people with developmental disabilities. Again, could you perhaps consider that "homosexual" and "gay" do not necessarily carry the same connotations as "fag?"
Or you could accept the fact that there are words you shouldn't use because of how derogatory they are to a certain group. Always the same argument, words aren't that important and people should get over pejoratives but god forbid you strip some out of my lexicon.
Well, alright. But a question: are there any derogatory words thrown at you that are associated with who you are?
So if I call someone and idiot, and mean they are mentally handicapped when I say it, what's the difference exactly? I mean, what have you really achieved by removing it from the language?
People still feel how they feel. Are you really going to feel better if they call you retarded by another name? If they want to give something a negative connotation they are going to and there's nothing you can do about it but convince them not to feel the way they feel. I think that's a much more worthy cause, and will solve the problem in general.
Ok. this whole campaign is intellectually challenged. that implies It's stupid, idiotic andor moronic, but not offending anyone.How about not using it as an insult/code word for something bad, period.
Lolwat. This is just straight up factually incorrect. Look up the history of the word before you talk about it."Idiot" is generic. I can't think of any instance in which a group of people was singled out and demeaned in association with that particular term.
Okay, I can dig you as a person.Absolutely. But i grew up in South America, things may be a bit different there. The Color of my skin, my slowness as a child, my body type... all these things were ripe for mockery. And its ok.
"Idiot" is generic. I can't think of any instance in which a group of people was singled out and demeaned in association with that particular term.
In 19th and early 20th century medicine and psychology, an "idiot" was a person with a very severe mental retardation. In the early 1900s, Dr. Henry H. Goddard proposed a classification system for mental retardation based on the Binet-Simon concept of mental age. Individuals with the lowest mental age level (less than three years) were identified as idiots; imbeciles had a mental age of three to seven years, and morons had a mental age of seven to ten years.[9] IQ, or intelligence quotient, is determined by dividing a person's mental age, as determined by standardized tests, by their actual age. The term "idiot" was used to refer to people having an IQ below 30.[10][11]
If you're in the presence of someone who doesn't like you using that word, you can very easily do the reasonable thing and stop using the word, at least around them. Or are you really so attached to your vocabulary that you can't even stow it for the sake of polite company?
"Idiot" is generic. I can't think of any instance in which a group of people was singled out and demeaned in association with that particular term.
If you're in the presence of someone who doesn't like you using that word, you can very easily do the reasonable thing and stop using the word, at least around them. Or are you really so attached to your vocabulary that you can't even stow it for the sake of polite company?
The difference is that there's nothing inherently bad about being or appearing gay. But being or acting unintelligent is kind of a bummer. Retarded is a feel-bad label, and so is "intellectually disabled," and so is the next label they think of, no matter who it gets applied to.
The point is, any sort of malice found within a slur is only there because people let themselves get offended by it.
The point is, any sort of malice found within a slur is only there because people let themselves get offended by it.
"Idiot" is generic. I can't think of any instance in which a group of people was singled out and demeaned in association with that particular term.
If you're in the presence of someone who doesn't like you using that word, you can very easily do the reasonable thing and stop using the word, at least around them. Or are you really so attached to your vocabulary that you can't even stow it for the sake of polite company?
The point is, any sort of malice found within a slur is only there because people let themselves get offended by it.
I don't see how this makes it any less offensive or unacceptable.
This is true. Do you think there are any circumstances under which someone has a right to be offended, or should everyone just shrug it off?
I am factually wrong on the case of "idiot," and I apologize. I guess what I meant is that it has become generic.
Sure. There will be people who have problems with any word. Sometimes it's because they found out there is some kind of history of hatred associated with the word, sometimes they just don't like the way it sounds, sometimes it's out of ignorance, etc.A fair point. Would you also consider that some other people might have a problem with certain words regardless of intent?
The point is, any sort of malice found within a slur is only there because people let themselves get offended by it.
Sure. There will be people who have problems with any word. Sometimes it's because they found out there is some kind of history of hatred associated with the word, sometimes they just don't like the way it sounds, sometimes it's out of ignorance, etc.
However, none of the above, or any other reason, makes it acceptable to be offended at a word rather than the intent expressed. If somebody uses a slur in a hateful way, obviously that is unacceptable. If somebody uses it without any ill intent, and you come down on them for being ignorant that the word upsets you, you're the one who is acting foolish. Stop giving words such power.
Personally I try not to use words that I think will offend people around me, unless their offense is particularly absurd. But I don't think one should be expected to act that way. It's a choice.
Everyone has the right to be offended no matter what the case. It's especially difficult to shrug off when a word has such a weighted history, like "nigger", but I just think people should work on not letting a word have so much power over them.
"Idiot" is generic. I can't think of any instance in which a group of people was singled out and demeaned in association with that particular term.