ISLAMABAD: Following Pathankot attack, the Indian media and government authorities have been referring to Mumbai attack as Pakistans work despite the fact that the Wikileaks had shown both the US and the British authorities trashing Indian so-called evidence against Pakistan.
Publicly both Washington and London have been shy to embarrass India and avoided rejecting her allegation against Pakistan but the Wikileaks showed the two trashing Indian claims about the involvement of either Pakistans prime intelligence agency- the ISI- or even senior leaders of a proscribed organisation.
Wikileaks, which contained secret State Department wires, had quoted former US ambassador to Pakistan Anne W Patterson as writing to the State Department that India had presented insufficient evidence against the senior leaders of now proscribed Lashkar-e-Taiba.
Anne W Patterson had mentioned in a wire to the Washington that Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) and other investigators had insufficient evidence for prosecution against Lashkar-e-Taibas Zaki-ur-Rehman Lakhvi, Zarar Shah and Mazhar Iqbal Alqama.
Patterson had even said that FIA was forced, as a result of political pressure, to arrest and charge the three LeT leaders and that FIA was still without solid evidence to begin a formal trial.
Some of the wires generated by US embassy in India had also made the Indias case on Mumbai attacks doubtful. Charge Geoff Pyatt was quoted to have written to Washington: Indian officials remain convinced that Pakistan is behind the July 11th Mumbai attacks, and worry that the US is setting the bar too high for solid evidence of Pakistani intelligence involvement.
The leak had even quoted National Security Advisor MK Narayanan as admitting that there are some pieces of the puzzle still missing. He (Narayanan) said he is hesitant to say the evidence is clinching, but it is pretty good. Narayanan used the opportunity to reinforce the popular perception here that Pakistan is to blame for the attacks, while answering criticism that the foreign secretarys and Mumbai polices statements about the investigation were not backed by solid proof
The wire, generated from New Delhi, had also shown the Indian politicians reminding the Americans that India had sided with US on the issue of 9/11 despite the absence of concrete evidence.
The wire said: At dinner with CIA Deputy Director of Intelligence Carmen Medina on October 23rd, former National Security Advisor Brajesh Mishra raised the issue of the US response to the Mumbai blasts.
We backed you when you decided to take action in Afghanistan after September 11, he said. Your evidence after 9/11 was no less circumstantial than our evidence after 7/11 in Mumbai.
He went on to criticise the US double standard, arguing that we treat Hizbollah one way, and the Pakistan-based United Jihad Council very differently. The bottom line, Mishra said, is that there is a widespread perception that the US is doing nothing to help India fight terror.
Another leak, a wire sent from US New Delhi embassy to Washington, reflects on British doubts about Indians evidence against Pakistan.
The leak said, While Indian press continues to pin blame on Pakistan, observers and diplomats in Delhi are asking the same question: was the ISI behind the Mumbai attacks? While there are clear links between the attacks, perpetrators and the extremist group LeT, and likewise, there are links between LeT and the ISI, there is no clear evidence yet to suggest that ISI directed or facilitated the attacks, according to the British High Commission.
Now yet again after Pathankot attack, Indians have started blaming Pakistan claiming that they have evidence of Pakistan's involvement.
