You don't have a statement. You make some vague ties between the totality of 28 EU countries(including those outside of EU) with the USA when it comes to "white supremacy". The only historical context for that would be the three countries that i mentioned. If talking purely about the modern world, then id wager that it's the quite the opposite on who is leaking the racist culture. I can't speak for every country, but we don't shoot black kids here and give a slap on the police wrists or have systemic profiling for black/brown skin colors.
I made a statement. You don't like it. Tough. I stand by it
GAF told me that European countries don't have racism though.
Glad that guy got knocked out.
The UK has a dreadful problem with racism because the papers have made everybody believe that the immigrants are coming for your children and most of the population are chumps and buy every word. It's fucking disgusting, and one of the main reasons I'm glad I did the opposite and emigrated (I'm a white Brit that got the fuck out).
Bloody emigrants...
You sound like a Frenchman.
Comparisons to the French is probably the easiest way to get a Pom to knock it off lol
Okay I do have a comment on what 'GAF' said. No one said that, if you can point them out, please do so I can put them on ignore because I dont want to read the ramblings of morons. I suspect you're making up this thing that 'GAF' said though.
Calling me a Wallaby would definitely grind my nutOh yeah, well you sound like a kiwi.
I don't know if that actually offends Aussies. In fact, I don't know if it's possible to offend Aussies at all.
thanksSure. I'll shoot you a PM when I get home.
It's irrelevant if i like it, it's factually untrue.
"What the hell was that for?!"
I wonder which Neogaf user said that.
Ah, the classic "but".
Guy was a massive douche although people need to understand two wrongs don't make a right.
It's not, ironically, a black and white issue. There are varying degrees of wrong. It is wrong to hit people but I doubt anyone is suggesting that makes him as bad as the other guy.What wrong did the black guy commit? If someone assaults you, you absolutely have the right to defend yourself. This whole "both sides were wrong" bullshit that pops up in threads like these is seriously annoying.
It's not, ironically, a black and white issue. There are varying degrees of wrong. It is wrong to hit people but I doubt anyone is suggesting that makes him as bad as the other guy.
Just, try to assume a little grey area here and not just get annoyed because people think it's wrong to punch people under most circumstances. They were surrounded by people and the guy was pissed as a newt, he'd hardly be able to do more than push him. Also, this shitbag could have got arrested but instead they just have to leave it.
Except no it's not. America did inherent most of its racist notions from Europe. Even if it only got them from the UK, France, And Holland, they are all still in Europe so the statement absolutely still applies.
Im pretty sure that he did not mean Europe on purely geographical terms.
I'm just trying to say that you'd be best not to take that last part of your argument as what people are attempting to say.Obviously it's wrong to hit people in most instance but I find most logical people know that force can be acceptable in some instances, which is why it's pointless to point it out in instance where it is clearly justifiable. All making comments like that does, is equate the victim to the abuser, which does a complete disservice to the person who was receiving the abuse.
The idiot was clearly trying to provoke him and the kid took the bait. Still, I probably would have taken the bait as well after being racially abused like that.What wrong did the black guy commit? If someone assaults you, you absolutely have the right to defend yourself. This whole "both sides were wrong" bullshit that pops up in threads like these is seriously annoying.
I'm just trying to say that you'd be best not to take that last part of your argument as what people are attempting to say.
The rest is all down to personal views on what is or isn't justifiable.
Im pretty sure that he did not mean Europe on purely geographical terms. The inability to draw distinction between the different states that occupy Europe is a bigger fallacy than saying the bible belt represents USA values.
The idiot was clearly trying to provoke him and the kid took the bait. Still, I probably would have taken the bait as well after being racially abused like that.
Well that's the first thing I thought of when he made that statement. In fact your response was the one I found weird because I don't understand how him saying that America inherited it's racist notions from Europe (which is undeniable true) suddenly equates to him saying all European nations are the same. It just seems like you got a bit too offended at his statement without realizing what he meant.
The idiot was clearly trying to provoke him and the kid took the bait. Still, I probably would have taken the bait as well after being racially abused like that.
punching him to the floor?That still doesn't answer my question. What wrong did the guy commit, for there to be "two wrongs"?
Drunk guy talks too much and gets rolled. This happens every day in every country on earth i'd imagine.
punching him to the floor?
The later discussion clearly shows that he did in fact mean some unified cultural heritage. Where would the culture of "white man supremacy" originally come from if not from Europe, geographically speaking, Africa? Anyway, the post he responded to was about modern times, it's me who proposed that he was pulling his statement from some historical context, because the notion that current European racism is spreading into USA is laughable. Modern racism in USA is purely on the country itself.
You're right; he shouldn't of punched him b/c then the racist would've...just found another way to justify them being right regardless?White person at the end: "What the hell was that for?!" (in response to the guy punching the racist)
Attitudes like that will just make the racist guy think he's in the right.
I can kinda believe this.You don't have a statement. You make some vague ties between the totality of 28 EU countries(including those outside of EU) with the USA when it comes to "white supremacy". The only historical context for that would be the three countries that i mentioned. If talking purely about the modern world, then id wager that it's the quite the opposite on who is leaking the racist culture. I can't speak for every country, but we don't shoot black kids here and give a slap on the police wrists or have systemic profiling for black/brown skin colors.
punching him to the floor?
U wot m8? U ar 1 fooking cheeky kunt m8 i swear i am goin 2 wreck u i swear on me mums life!
Everyone cheering/ignoring the guy punching the racist will make him think that assault is fine. If anything, getting punched will make the racist think that he's in the right more so than anything else.White person at the end: "What the hell was that for?!" (in response to the guy punching the racist)
Attitudes like that will just make the racist guy think he's in the right.
the drunk racist shoved the black guy after explicitly being told not to touch him. Seems like self-defense to me.
punching him to the floor?
Ok this whole post is inaccurate. He clearly meant it and even specified that he was speaking in a historical context and not of modern Europe, reread his posts. Nowhere does he say that the current US racism is derived from modern Europe. I think you're severely misinterpreting him.
If someone assaults you, you have the right to fight back. Would you tell someone who was getting raped that punching their attacker was wrong, because you should never hit a person?
Definitely. He seemed a lot calmer than the woman did, that's for damn sure.Guy had done well to keep his cool up to that point.
Thumps up for Europe!The guy was Australian, so... Technically Europe is still a multicultural utopia.
Alright, suppose that's what he meant. What relevancy does that comment have to anything at hand with the current discussion then? I find it hard to believe that the whole purpose was to make a "Europe did it first.lol" post. Anyway, i probably derailed this enough as it is.
Oh come on now, there is a clear difference between defending yourself from severe harm and getting your own back against someone who just slightly pushed you.
The proper way!Yeah i saw this last week
On a side note, i like the she pronounces cunt lol
The idiot was clearly trying to provoke him and the kid took the bait. Still, I probably would have taken the bait as well after being racially abused like that.
Yeah you did kinda, but I'm pretty sure it was just a passing comment, and even if he did mean it in relation to modern Europe, that wouldn't be that far from the truth. there isn't a single country in Europe that's any where close to a racial utopia.
I know that, but the argument he seemed to be trying to make is that all violence is wrong even if it is seemingly justifiable.