• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Peaceful race relations continue in the UK

Status
Not open for further replies.
You don't have a statement. You make some vague ties between the totality of 28 EU countries(including those outside of EU) with the USA when it comes to "white supremacy". The only historical context for that would be the three countries that i mentioned. If talking purely about the modern world, then id wager that it's the quite the opposite on who is leaking the racist culture. I can't speak for every country, but we don't shoot black kids here and give a slap on the police wrists or have systemic profiling for black/brown skin colors.

I made a statement. You don't like it. Tough. I stand by it
 
GAF told me that European countries don't have racism though.

Glad that guy got knocked out.

I dont have a comment on what 'GAF' told you here, but its a good idea to consider the UK separate from continental Europe when it comes to non trade, non law stuff. They themselves do after all. The culture there is significantly different from the rest of Europe.

Okay I do have a comment on what 'GAF' said. No one said that, if you can point them out, please do so I can put them on ignore because I dont want to read the ramblings of morons. I suspect you're making up this thing that 'GAF' said though.
 
The UK has a dreadful problem with racism because the papers have made everybody believe that the immigrants are coming for your children and most of the population are chumps and buy every word. It's fucking disgusting, and one of the main reasons I'm glad I did the opposite and emigrated (I'm a white Brit that got the fuck out).

Bloody emigrants...
 
You sound like a Frenchman.

Comparisons to the French is probably the easiest way to get a Pom to knock it off lol

Oh yeah, well you sound like a kiwi.

I don't know if that actually offends Aussies. In fact, I don't know if it's possible to offend Aussies at all.
 
Okay I do have a comment on what 'GAF' said. No one said that, if you can point them out, please do so I can put them on ignore because I dont want to read the ramblings of morons. I suspect you're making up this thing that 'GAF' said though.

Sure. I'll shoot you a PM when I get home.
 
It's irrelevant if i like it, it's factually untrue.

Except no it's not. America did inherent most of its racist notions from Europe. Even if it only got them from the UK, France, And Holland, they are all still in Europe so the statement absolutely still applies.
 
"What the hell was that for?!"
I wonder which Neogaf user said that.



Ah, the classic "but".

But is right though. Just don't hit people, even horrible little shits, unless they're hitting you or someone else.

The guy could barely speak to begin with.
 
Guy was a massive douche although people need to understand two wrongs don't make a right.

What wrong did the black guy commit? If someone assaults you, you absolutely have the right to defend yourself. This whole "both sides were wrong" bullshit that pops up in threads like these is seriously annoying.
 
What wrong did the black guy commit? If someone assaults you, you absolutely have the right to defend yourself. This whole "both sides were wrong" bullshit that pops up in threads like these is seriously annoying.
It's not, ironically, a black and white issue. There are varying degrees of wrong. It is wrong to hit people but I doubt anyone is suggesting that makes him as bad as the other guy.

Just, try to assume a little grey area here and not just get annoyed because people think it's wrong to punch people under most circumstances. They were surrounded by people and the guy was pissed as a newt, he'd hardly be able to do more than push him. Also, this shitbag could have got arrested but instead they just have to leave it.
 
It's not, ironically, a black and white issue. There are varying degrees of wrong. It is wrong to hit people but I doubt anyone is suggesting that makes him as bad as the other guy.

Just, try to assume a little grey area here and not just get annoyed because people think it's wrong to punch people under most circumstances. They were surrounded by people and the guy was pissed as a newt, he'd hardly be able to do more than push him. Also, this shitbag could have got arrested but instead they just have to leave it.

Obviously it's wrong to hit people in most instance but I find most logical people know that force can be acceptable in some instances, which is why it's pointless to point it out in instance where it is clearly justifiable. All making comments like that does, is equate the victim to the abuser, which does a complete disservice to the person who was receiving the abuse.
 
Except no it's not. America did inherent most of its racist notions from Europe. Even if it only got them from the UK, France, And Holland, they are all still in Europe so the statement absolutely still applies.

Im pretty sure that he did not mean Europe on purely geographical terms. The inability to draw distinction between the different states that occupy Europe is a bigger fallacy than saying the bible belt represents USA values.
 
Im pretty sure that he did not mean Europe on purely geographical terms.

Well that's the first thing I thought of when he made that statement. In fact your response was the one I found weird because I don't understand how him saying that America inherited it's racist notions from Europe (which is undeniable true) suddenly equates to him saying all European nations are the same. It just seems like you got a bit too offended at his statement without realizing what he meant.
 
Obviously it's wrong to hit people in most instance but I find most logical people know that force can be acceptable in some instances, which is why it's pointless to point it out in instance where it is clearly justifiable. All making comments like that does, is equate the victim to the abuser, which does a complete disservice to the person who was receiving the abuse.
I'm just trying to say that you'd be best not to take that last part of your argument as what people are attempting to say.

The rest is all down to personal views on what is or isn't justifiable.
 
Skipped around... All I heard the guy who gets knocked out say is "Who are you fighting for??" or something. And I'm fightin for the 21st century mate
 
What wrong did the black guy commit? If someone assaults you, you absolutely have the right to defend yourself. This whole "both sides were wrong" bullshit that pops up in threads like these is seriously annoying.
The idiot was clearly trying to provoke him and the kid took the bait. Still, I probably would have taken the bait as well after being racially abused like that.
 
I'm just trying to say that you'd be best not to take that last part of your argument as what people are attempting to say.

The rest is all down to personal views on what is or isn't justifiable.

Even if that's not what they are intending to say that is exactly what their comments are doing, which is why I find comments such as that problematic.
 
Im pretty sure that he did not mean Europe on purely geographical terms. The inability to draw distinction between the different states that occupy Europe is a bigger fallacy than saying the bible belt represents USA values.

On what terms did he mean it?

His statement was accurate.
 
Well that's the first thing I thought of when he made that statement. In fact your response was the one I found weird because I don't understand how him saying that America inherited it's racist notions from Europe (which is undeniable true) suddenly equates to him saying all European nations are the same. It just seems like you got a bit too offended at his statement without realizing what he meant.

The later discussion clearly shows that he did in fact mean some unified cultural heritage. Where would the culture of "white man supremacy" originally come from if not from Europe, geographically speaking, Africa? Anyway, the post he responded to was about modern times, it's me who proposed that he was pulling his statement from some historical context, because the notion that current European racism is spreading into USA is laughable. Modern racism in USA is purely on the country itself.
 
The later discussion clearly shows that he did in fact mean some unified cultural heritage. Where would the culture of "white man supremacy" originally come from if not from Europe, geographically speaking, Africa? Anyway, the post he responded to was about modern times, it's me who proposed that he was pulling his statement from some historical context, because the notion that current European racism is spreading into USA is laughable. Modern racism in USA is purely on the country itself.

Ok this whole post is inaccurate. He clearly meant it and even specified that he was speaking in a historical context and not of modern Europe, reread his posts. Nowhere does he say that the current US racism is derived from modern Europe. I think you're severely misinterpreting him.
 
What exactly is the point of this thread?

White person at the end: "What the hell was that for?!" (in response to the guy punching the racist)

Attitudes like that will just make the racist guy think he's in the right.
You're right; he shouldn't of punched him b/c then the racist would've...just found another way to justify them being right regardless?

You don't have a statement. You make some vague ties between the totality of 28 EU countries(including those outside of EU) with the USA when it comes to "white supremacy". The only historical context for that would be the three countries that i mentioned. If talking purely about the modern world, then id wager that it's the quite the opposite on who is leaking the racist culture. I can't speak for every country, but we don't shoot black kids here and give a slap on the police wrists or have systemic profiling for black/brown skin colors.
I can kinda believe this.

I mean, I'm sure the UK has problems w/ racism; every country does. But it doesn't seem quite a potent as it is here in the States which, tbf, is a bit exaggerated, but the media loves to use it for divide-and-conquer purposes and when you see people thinking broadly in terms of "race relations" or "race wars" or whatever, they appear to do their job well.

But...and if I can take a moment to get a little fancy and proper fun here...if it's UK I can ignore some of it b/c you guys helped give the world Jungle and Drum and Bass, only the two best genres of electronic music and the two best new genres of music post-Berlin Wall collapse. Oh and UK Garage. Even at the time that was happening, that sort of stuff would have never happened here in the states simply b/c everything's a lot more...well...about racism here. Both legit and non-legit.

Sadly. Closest I can think of is stuff like Onxy+Biohazard or early No Doubt. Or Bosstones 3rd wave ska. The pickings are quite slim in this regard.
 
U wot m8? U ar 1 fooking cheeky kunt m8 i swear i am goin 2 wreck u i swear on me mums life!

Seems a little bit hypocritical to have a dig at people from different socioeconomic backgrounds (particularly when they're the ones speaking out against this drunk guy) on a topic dealing with xenophobia.
 
White person at the end: "What the hell was that for?!" (in response to the guy punching the racist)

Attitudes like that will just make the racist guy think he's in the right.
Everyone cheering/ignoring the guy punching the racist will make him think that assault is fine. If anything, getting punched will make the racist think that he's in the right more so than anything else.

Having said that, fuck the racist, no excuse even if he was drunk off his head.

the drunk racist shoved the black guy after explicitly being told not to touch him. Seems like self-defense to me.

Difference between self-defense and getting your own back.
 
Ok this whole post is inaccurate. He clearly meant it and even specified that he was speaking in a historical context and not of modern Europe, reread his posts. Nowhere does he say that the current US racism is derived from modern Europe. I think you're severely misinterpreting him.

Alright, suppose that's what he meant. What relevancy does that comment have to anything at hand with the current discussion then? I find it hard to believe that the whole purpose was to make a "Europe did it first.lol" post. Anyway, i probably derailed this enough as it is.
 
Sigh, attitude of some people in this country is disgusting and I swear it feels like it's getting worse with whole the anti-immigration sentiment.

Responding to a moderate push by smacking him in the face was a bit much imo but it's understandable under the circumstances. Guy had done well to keep his cool up to that point.
 
If someone assaults you, you have the right to fight back. Would you tell someone who was getting raped that punching their attacker was wrong, because you should never hit a person?

Oh come on now, there is a clear difference between defending yourself from severe harm and getting your own back against someone who just slightly pushed you.
 
Alright, suppose that's what he meant. What relevancy does that comment have to anything at hand with the current discussion then? I find it hard to believe that the whole purpose was to make a "Europe did it first.lol" post. Anyway, i probably derailed this enough as it is.

Yeah you did kinda :), but I'm pretty sure it was just a passing comment, and even if he did mean it in relation to modern Europe, that wouldn't be that far from the truth. there isn't a single country in Europe that's any where close to a racial utopia.

Oh come on now, there is a clear difference between defending yourself from severe harm and getting your own back against someone who just slightly pushed you.

I know that, but the argument he seemed to be trying to make is that all violence is wrong even if it is seemingly justifiable.
 
Of course people are against violence here. I'm not surprised. When a drunk racist argues for several minutes then pushes the kid. What the fuck does anyone expect? Of course he's taking one to the chops for that, no question.

Yeah i saw this last week
On a side note, i like the she pronounces cunt lol
The proper way!
 
The idiot was clearly trying to provoke him and the kid took the bait. Still, I probably would have taken the bait as well after being racially abused like that.

I don't think there was any baiting being done. While I doubt the old racist was going to do more than push him and berate him, the black dude responded appropriately in cleaning the oldster's clock after the shove. You never put hands on someone in a threatening manner like that. The black dude acted with more restraint than I ever could, leading up to it, that's for sure.
 
Yeah you did kinda :), but I'm pretty sure it was just a passing comment, and even if he did mean it in relation to modern Europe, that wouldn't be that far from the truth. there isn't a single country in Europe that's any where close to a racial utopia.



I know that, but the argument he seemed to be trying to make is that all violence is wrong even if it is seemingly justifiable.

Sounds more like he was saying violence in that particular situation was wrong, not violence in every conceivable situation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom