• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Pedobear-Age...Help.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ceekus said:
This happened to me when I was almost the your age (I wonder if it's a college guy/high school girl thing...). Anyway, when I figured out she wasn't just flirting for flirts sake and it kind of fell on me (not literally, but close), to make a move or say um, thanks no. As it happened, I chose um, thanks no and I don't regret it (In fact, I had actually forgotten about the whole thing until I read this thread).

As far as how I did it, I basically told her she was really attractive and if I were closer to her age then I would have loved to, but that I just didn't think it made sense considering how far apart we were in age and in our lives (I mean, she was an intern and a junior in High School and I was about to graduate college. She acted so childlike I felt uncomfortable even being attracted to her). She didn't handle the rejection very well. She was very embarassed, didn't talk to me much after that, and quit the job not too long after. I felt somewhat responsible, but I didn't have any other choice as I saw it.

So, to answer your question, be honest with her, have the discussion and get it out of the way, and let her get over it however she needs to. I'm sure having a hot little girl dying to **** you is doing wonders for your ego, but if you're not going to have a relationship with her, you owe her that honesty so she can find someone else to throw herself at.
coldvein said:
I'm gonna have to go with DO IT
 
dont **** her. Make her quit and find another job and then **** her, trust me if she wants the cock that much then she will quit her job.
 
oh dear im in the same boat except im 20 and the girl is 16. and this girl is really cute too. i was in high school she wouldnt give me a second look.
 
1. you ARE an idiot
2. **** her brains out
3. wear a rubber and make sure you dont bruise her


Don't forget, if you do her wrong her parents can sue you!!
 
You're in a managerial position, it would be extremely stupid and potentially hazardous to involve yourself sexually/emotionally with this co-worker. Stay the heck away, she's a trap.
 
DigDugDirkDiggler said:
They have the same name. I wasn't sure if she was refering to herself or the girl I'm actually dating. Their name's are both "Jane"*

*Name's changed to protect me.

Perfect!

If you GF finds out... just tell her you forgot what she looked like and got confused with someone else of the same name.
 
Where i work, a 16 year old girl managed to become checkout supervisor by sleeping with the manager of the store, hes in his 50s probably. Also the manager has a son, who works in the store, and is gay with someone else in the store. Apparently they were caught in the chiller with piece in hand.
 
Ceekus said:
This happened to me when I was almost the your age (I wonder if it's a college guy/high school girl thing...). Anyway, when I figured out she wasn't just flirting for flirts sake and it kind of fell on me (not literally, but close), to make a move or say um, thanks no. As it happened, I chose um, thanks no and I don't regret it (In fact, I had actually forgotten about the whole thing until I read this thread).

As far as how I did it, I basically told her she was really attractive and if I were closer to her age then I would have loved to, but that I just didn't think it made sense considering how far apart we were in age and in our lives (I mean, she was an intern and a junior in High School and I was about to graduate college. She acted so childlike I felt uncomfortable even being attracted to her). She didn't handle the rejection very well. She was very embarassed, didn't talk to me much after that, and quit the job not too long after. I felt somewhat responsible, but I didn't have any other choice as I saw it.

So, to answer your question, be honest with her, have the discussion and get it out of the way, and let her get over it however she needs to. I'm sure having a hot little girl dying to **** you is doing wonders for your ego, but if you're not going to have a relationship with her, you owe her that honesty so she can find someone else to throw herself at.

WTF take this shit out of the thread /jk

I wouldn't cheat on my gf to go for an impressionable 16yr old.

break if off with the gf then hit it ;)

Seriously, if she asks you again whether you are ****ing your gf just say that you are going be doing it all night. :)
 
from my perspective and the laws i was raised with I have no problem with a 22 year old boning a 16 year old, do it and then flee from your stupid police enforcing your dumb law.
 
Takuan said:
You're in a managerial position, it would be extremely stupid and potentially hazardous to involve yourself sexually/emotionally with this co-worker. Stay the heck away, she's a trap.

But come on, managerial position at 22? Is this a McDonald's job we are so concerned about?
 
catfish said:
from my perspective and the laws i was raised with I have no problem with a 22 year old boning a 16 year old, do it and then flee from your stupid police enforcing your dumb law.

Pretty much how I feel. I actually find the prefix "pedo" kinda stupid since 16 years old is not a kid.
 
Instigator said:
No, just a dumb teenager

I've met 16 year olds much smarter than 25 year olds. Not to mention that 2 years more don't make you any much wiser. Point is pedophilia (real one not the bullshit american version) is wrong and should be punished because it's unnatural and not because the kid is "dumb" and can't make the right decisions. If the reason was that they should completely ban sex for all people under 18 or with low IQ.
 
fortified_concept said:
I've met 16 year olds much smarter than 25 year olds. Not to mention that 2 years more don't make you any much wiser. Point is pedophilia (real one not the bullshit american version) is wrong and should be punished because it's unnatural and not because the kid is "dumb" and can't make the right decisions. If the reason was that they should completely ban sex for all people under 18 or with low IQ.

Your argument for things being unnatural is stupid and completely arbitrary. In fact, it is a very vague concept used by crazy conservatives to outlaw such things as homosexuality, abortion and the other crazy issues they are obsessed about.

We prevent kids across the board from driving, drinking, voting and having sex because different communities decide they are not smart enough to make such decisions, possibly leading to worse things if we did let them. How this is done varies, but for practical reasons, we can not determine if each individual kid is 'ready' so it is decided that below a certain age, all kids should not do X, just to be on the safe side. After that point, they can go nuts. No guarantees that some won't be dumb enough to screw up their lives.

And despite your anecdotal evidence, most 16-year-olds are most certainly dumb. In retrospect, I can also claim I was not too smart at that age either. Maybe I was still smarter than some 25-year-old out there, but that's no consolation.
 
Instigator said:
Your argument for things being unnatural is stupid and completely arbitrary. In fact, it is a very vague concept used by crazy conservatives to outlaw such things as homosexuality, abortion and the other crazy issues they are obsessed about.

We prevent kids across the board from driving, drinking, voting and having sex because different communities decide they are not smart enough to make such decisions, possibly leading to worse things if we did let them. How this is done varies, but for practical reasons, we can not determine if each individual kid is 'ready' so it is decided that below a certain age, all kids should not do X, just to be on the safe side. After that point, they can go nuts. No guarantees that some won't be dumb enough to screw up their lives.

And despite your anecdotal evidence, most 16-year-olds are most certainly dumb. In retrospect, I can also claim I was not too smart at that age either. Maybe I was still smarter than some 25-year-old out there, but that's no consolation.

Uh no, homosexuality isn't unnatural since it's nature's result. If it was a "lifestyle choice" like the some retarded conservatives think then it would be unnatural. As for the rest of your arguments they don't stand since you equate driving and voting actions that require responsibility with sex which is... just sex. I think some americans take sex way too seriously and for a person that doesn't like conservatives you sure bought their lame excuses. The only reason these stupid laws exist in USA is because USA is a conservative nation.
 
Dimmuxx said:
15 in Sweden.. Sweden FTW! :lol

And in Canada its 14... this thread isn't about which country you can go to and legally nail "minors" it's about how to get the OP's co-worker to layoff on the flirting.
 
fortified_concept said:
Uh no, homosexuality isn't unnatural since it's nature's result. If it was a lifestyle choice like the some retarded conservative think then it would be unnatural. As for the rest of your argument it doesn't stand since you equate driving and voting actions that require responsibility with sex which is... just sex. I think some americans take sex way too seriously. And for a person that doesn't like conservatives you sure bought their lame excuses. The only reason these stupid laws exist in USA is because it's a conservative nation.

Come on, some guys are just horny creeps looking for an easy lay, others are just attracted to kids and have been forever (and I seriously doubt you didn't know that already). By your definition, the latter seeking out kids is natural, if only illegal. Some people are just born as psychopaths/sociopaths, making them much more likely to commit crimes like robberies, extortion or even murder. That may be how they were born, it may be natural as far as they're concerned, but it is still no excuse for the rest of us, likely victims to these predators.

Bringing out something as being 'natural' into your argument was a mistake on your part, you should have stuck to arguing for having a less puritanical take on sex.

As far as sex just being sex, with no complications, no consequences, no responsibilities... I'd love to live in your fantasy world with no STD's and pregnancies. :lol
 
EGM92 said:
And in Canada its 14... this thread isn't about which country you can go to and legally nail "minors" it's about how to get the OP's co-worker to layoff on the flirting.
Who the fk makes up these sex consent ages for countries.
 
I can sympathise (if thats the word) with the original poster. While I'm not a manager I am a supervisor where I work. We get alot of summer workers and xmas workers. This summer we had alot of cute young girls working for us and all the shenanigans that entails.

Long story short you'll get alot of attention if you are roughly in their age bracket (the youngest were 16, I'm 23) and if you are in a position of authority. I honestly didnt believe all that BS about girls are turned on by powerful (as they might see it) guys. Not until I seen if for myself anyway. I agree that alot of these girls are so hot they wouldnt give you the time of day if you where in the same class as them back in college or whatever. But if you are a manager or supervisor then your instantly attractive. Women eh?

I wouldnt have felt comfortable hitting on any of them considering my position and whatnot. As stupid as that statement might seem.

When they left they wrote me notes and one girl even made me a badge, which I wasnt allowed to wear for health and safety reasons. Good times.
 
Borci88 said:
Who the fk makes up these sex consent ages for countries.

Here in Canada we have cold harsh winters that a lot of people don't make it through, so we must reproduce as quickly and early as possible to keep out populations stable... or at least I'd like to believe.
 
Instigator said:
Come on, some guys are just horny creeps looking for an easy lay, others are just attracted to kids and have been forever (and I seriously doubt you didn't know that already). By your definition, the latter seeking out kids is natural, if only illegal. Some people are just born as psychopaths/sociopaths, making them much more likely to commit crimes like robberies, extortion or even murder. That may be how they were born, it may be natural as far as they're concerned, but it is still no excuse for the rest of us, likely victims to these predators.

Bringing out something as being 'natural' into your argument was a mistake on your part, you should have stuck to arguing for having a less puritanical take on sex.

As far as sex just being sex, with no complications, no consequences, no responsibilities... I'd love to live in your fantasy world with no STD's and pregnancies. :lol

I think society's rules should follow nature's laws not strictly but reasonably. For example I don't consider polygamy a crime as long as all partners know whats' going on. Inprisoning someone for polygamy is ridiculous. And since 16 is a perfectly natural age for sex I don't think there's any problem. That's the way I meant it.

As for STDs it falls in the "dumb to have sex" category which I've already argued about. If you weren't raised properly and can't see how stupid unprotected sex with a stranger is at 16, I doubt you'll smarten up at 18. And if reason is that "they're dumb and could catch an STD" shouldn't they completely ban sex for all teens under 18 (no matter if their partner is adult or not) or for people with low IQ?
 
Well, at least you can't say the wrong name when having sex with the one but thinking about the other girl.



Heh, this works on multiple levels :p
 
DigDugDirkDiggler said:
Inspired by the discussion in the "Whale Rider Becomes Whale" thread, here's my current issue with an underage female:

I've got a 16 year old from work who's becoming more and more "enamoured" with me.
She says she hates working unless I'm around, she says that "I smell good" and gives me non-stop hugs and draws hearts with my name in them. She does alot of this stuff just to be cute and get my attention and make me smile, but there's definately some truth behind it.
I just dropped her off at home and she asked, "So what are ya gonna do tonight, **** Jane?"*

*Her real name is not Jane, but she did indeed say her real name at the end of the question.

I obviously did a double take, because the flirting is getting to a critical level, but I'm also dating someone named Jane (again, not the real name) who is of legal age, and I know I've mentioned that to her before. I said "WHAT?" and she played it all coy like, "Oh, *giggle* nevermind".

I think I've mentioned this in previous threads, but I'm 22 and in a manger's position. I'm not an idiot, I'm not looking for advice in terms of if I should keep my manhood in my pants, I know that nothing will ever come of this...so I'm making this thread for a few reasons.

1. To entertain GAF
2. To entertain myself
3. WHAT THE **** DO I DO FROM A MANAGER'S PERSPECTIVE? Just smile and shrug it off, or say something to make sure she knows I'm not in any position legally/morally/professionally to do anything.

I will say this however, which is the only reason this thread has any clout; she is the most ****able 16 year old I've ever seen in my life. Do not ask for pics you sick ****ers. If she was 2 years older however...:lol

16 is the new 18. I say go for it
 
fortified_concept said:
I think society's rules should follow nature's laws not strictly but reasonably. For example I don't consider polygamy a crime as long as all partners know whats' going on. Inprisoning someone for polygamy is ridiculous. And since 16 is a perfectly natural age for sex I don't think there's any problem. That's the way I meant it.

As for STDs it falls in the "dumb to have sex" category which I've already argued about. If you weren't raised properly and can't see how stupid unprotected sex with a stranger is at 16, I doubt you'll smarten up at 18. And if reason is that "they're dumb and could catch an STD" shouldn't they completely ban sex for all teens under 18 (no matter if their partner is adult or not) or for people with low IQ?

Hey, why stop at 18, why not raise it to 21 or even 25? These people will never smarten up, right?

Consent laws appear to be a mix of concerns: parents with children under their care not wanting their kids to engage in sexual relations with their peers too early (let children have their childhood), parents concerned about adults just wanting to exploit their children and just general concerns about various health issues and teen pregnancy. STD's is just one issue in all of this.

In different communities, age of consent varies but I don't know of any Western country where it is below 14. After 14, it's a big gray area, certainly as long as children/teens are still under parental care.

I fully support all the adult GAF virgins still living in their parents' basement to get some, most preferably with someone their own age. :)
 
I may be Pedobear, but that's in name only.


Never ever have sex with a 16 years old man. That's like...in the Bible!
 
DigDugDirkDiggler said:
3. WHAT THE **** DO I DO FROM A MANAGER'S PERSPECTIVE? Just smile and shrug it off, or say something to make sure she knows I'm not in any position legally/morally/professionally to do anything.

I'm a manager to and I'm dating a girl that I hired. She is of legal age, though :lol

The answer to this question you already know--its unethical and technically you're not supposed to do it. No one will enforce it, but you know you shouldnt.

However, I'd hit it. Whats a little jail time, anytime?
 
DigDugDirkDiggler said:
I will say this however, which is the only reason this thread has any clout; she is the most ****able 16 year old I've ever seen in my life. Do not ask for pics you sick ****ers. If she was 2 years older however...:lol

:lol I bet that you've jerked off to her countless times...come on....admit it man.



Pedobear said:
I may be Pedobear, but that's in name only.


Never ever have sex with a 16 years old man. That's like...in the Bible!


You don't deserve the handle dude....the real Pedobear would be telling him to **** her silly...
 
Hey, why stop at 18, why not raise it to 21 or even 25? These people will never smarten up, right?

You're actually supporting my argument here. Shouldn't we just make laws based on nature (hormones, reproductive system etc) instead of trying to guess when the teen is gonna be "smart enough", which like I stated hasn't got much to do with sex anyways. And as far as sex is concerned imo it's not a matter of age it's more a matter of experiences, right parenting and sex education. 25 year old americans in the 50's probably knew less and were less responsible about sex than a european 15 year old nowadays.

Instigator said:
Consent laws appear to be a mix of concerns: parents with children under their care not wanting their kids to engage in sexual relations with their peers too early (let children have their childhood), parents concerned about adults just wanting to exploit their children and just general concerns about various health issues and teen pregnancy. STD's is just one issue in all of this.

In different communities, age of consent varies but I don't know of any Western country where it is below 14. After 14, it's a big gray area, certainly as long as children/teens are still under parental care.

I fully support all the adult GAF virgins still living in their parents' basement to get some, most preferably with someone their own age. :)

STDs have nothing to do with the argument though, that's what I'm trying to explain to you. It doesn't matter if the teen is having sex with an adult or another teen, if it's not smart enough he/she'll regret it. As for the rest it's a matter of how conservative the society is. And since USA is maybe the most conservative western nation there's no doubt why ridiculous laws like statutory rape for someone for example who had sex with a 16 year old exist.
 
Well I'm sure he's fantasized about banging her already so when he is actually doing her for real, he should just fantasize that he's 30 and that she's 24....

Problem solved.
 
You know what would be funny? Do like those Japanese porno flicks I've seen where she serves customers while you are rooting her from behind some curtain.
 
Pedobear said:
I may be Pedobear, but that's in name only.


Never ever have sex with a 16 years old man. That's like...in the Bible!

Where's your own seal of approval! You fail at pedoing.

Tell him to go younger or something to make up for it.
 
fortified_concept said:
You're actually supporting my argument here.

But if you remember, you started this by taking issue with me calling a 16-year-old dumb. I'm not arguing for stricter consent laws, I don't really care either way (I'm not a parent and I don't fancy teenage girls). But I can offer an opposing viewpoint to you wanting to lower the age of consent since you dragged me into this. :)


STDs have nothing to do with the argument though, that's what I'm trying to explain to you. It doesn't matter if the teen is having sex with an adult or another teen, if it's not smart enough he/she'll regret it.

STDs have something to do with the argument because it refers as to why kids/teens may not be responsible enough to engage in sexual relations and so as with any health issue with children, that responsiblity falls on the parent, to make that decision for them and hopefully, give them the right upbringing so that they can make those decisions on their own later in life.
 
w52963206.jpg


Carefull with that stuff, dont follow the C*ck but stay professional ;)

BTW pic please, may change my opinion :D
 
I was in a similar situation with a 17 year old female coworker when I worked at Gamestop of all places. She literally came up to me one day and said "when we gonna ****?"

To avoid any potential drama (to say the least), I simply said "never". And yeah, I was her manager also.

I did have thoughts of knocking away a pile of discount cards and bending her over the trade-in counter :-/
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom