• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Peter Dinklage in Bungie's Destiny - That wizard came from the moon

I wasn't a fan of some of the dialog or its delivery, but if the full product is as good as the Alpha, I'll overlook it. Game was fun as hell.

I miss it... Even Dinklbot...
 
I think it's just a bad performance, really bad, with probably more of the fault going towards whoever was directing and editing it than Dinklage.

You can get good voice acting done on a shoestring if you really try, so there's no excuse here for a multimillion dollar studio.
 
Correct me if I'm wrong, but haven't we only heard a few paragraphs of dialogue from him total? I would like to think our sample size of dialogue is pretty small and maybe it's one of the worse sections. I think Bungie also still has time to put a vocoder on his dialogue.

Trying to be positive here, with all the moon wizards and whatnot.
 
Reading through comments in this and other Destiny threads, I'm a bit baffled why the disappointment is directed at Dinklage. I share the thought the performance heard in the Alpha does not meet expectations, but the backlash should be directed at the decision makers who said "yep, the voice acting meets quality standard and needs to be in-game"
 
That's what I was thinking. Maybe his emotionless voice acting was deliberate.

But it doesn't sound emotionless, it sounds *BORED*. That's the distinction people are making. The suit in Half Life sounds emotionless. The floating head thing in Starcraft sounds emotionless. This sounds like a bored human trying to fake emotion.
 
The performance didn't really bother me either way. I didn't hate it like others but it also wasn't anything special and feel anyone could have delivered a similar performance.

I liked the multiplayer announcer. Made a change from an aggressive gravely voice usually used in MP games.
 
I honestly didn't even think about it until seeing some topics about it online. The voice work from him or the PVP announcer didn't take anything away from the game for me. It seems as though from the trailers I've watched that the voice effects for Ghost/Dinklage weren't turned on during the Alpha. Some parts made me laugh like "If you see something floating in the air, kill it!" I chuckled a little after that line but nothing about it made me think, "this is bad."
 
I think the problem has to do with him not sounding robotic enough. Either he should not be saying things that require emotion to be impactful, or, he should be completely devoid of any emotion all together. He's not robotic enough to be a believable robot, and he's not human enough to be making quips.

He's in the uncanny valley of voice acting.
 
I agree some of his line in the alpha felt…iffy, but remember last years e3 demo? I think that worked really well.

This backlash is really only based on a few short sentences. From the sounds of it, the Ghost plays a pretty major part in the story so I imagine there'll be much more to hear. I think we should give him/bungie the benefit of the doubt until we hear more - there's a serious amount of talent between them.
 
My feelings as I watched/heard him in the game:

It sounds like he showed up to do a read through on the script and they just recorded it with their cell phones and posted it into the game.

Then there is the multiplayer announcer, that was painful to listen to as well.
 
I've been watching alot of Best of the Worst from Red letter media on youtube, the voice acting in Destiny is comparable to most of those movies.... LOL
 
That's the "problem" with today's youtube culture. That line plays once in the whole game and yet we've all heard it over and over again. On a normal play through you probably wouldn't spend more than a few seconds thinking about the quality of the voice delivery of that line.
 
It's just one line though.

And someone wrote it for him to read, so I'm guessing that would be the problem.

True, that line I doubt many people could make sound serious. Morgan Freeman maybe, but he's god.

Really Bungie though, why "Wizard" at all rather than something that sounds somewhat plausible for a futuristic wizard?
 
In all fairness, it might be impossible for any actor to deliver a line like "that wizard came from the moon" with conviction.

I don't mind Dinklage's performance. The Crucible announcer, on the other hand, is pretty terrible.
 
True, that line I doubt many people could make sound serious. Morgan Freeman maybe, but he's god.

Really Bungie though, why "Wizard" at all rather than something that sounds somewhat plausible for a futuristic wizard?

Whats wrong with wizard? Seriously sci-fi writers are always coming up with dumb names for their "not magic" concepts. I like that Bungie decided to go against that. Its not an Adept, Jedi, or any of that other bullshit. It a motherfucking Wizard that came from the motherfucking moon. That's kinda awesome.

But yeah that voice acting kinda sucks.
 
I wish more people understood that the results of his voice acting are mostly the fault of whoever was directing him. Just like "bad" or odd acting in a film is hugely the directors fault, whose job it is to direct the actors. Yes, his delivery sounds bored, but can you really blame him more for that than the team of people who sat in front of him and said "awesome job! On to the next line"? I'd argue no, just like in other media.

I'm not defending him, just applying the situation to the real situation for actors.
 
Whats wrong with wizard? Seriously sci-fi writers are always coming up with dumb names for their "not magic" concepts. I like that Bungie decided to go against that. Its not an Adept, Jedi, or any of that other bullshit. It a motherfucking Wizard that came from the motherfucking moon. That's kinda awesome.
It could work if they were even considering embracing the ridiculousness and insanity of the concept. But they're so far up their own ass with the lore and treating everything so seriously that something as ridiculous as that line sticks out like a sore thumb.


The only ones who could really pull off "the wizard came from the moon" are the Magicka guys. :p
 
It could work if they were even considering embracing the ridiculousness and insanity of the concept. But they're so far up their own ass with the lore and treating everything so seriously that something as ridiculous as that line sticks out like a sore thumb.


The only ones who could really pull off "the wizard came from the moon" are the Magicka guys. :p

The concept of an alien in long flowing robes flying around and shooting lasers at people is already a ridiculous concept. Why does calling it a wizard make it more ridiculous than using some made up name like "Voidmancer?" Why can't a wizard from space be played completely straight? Personally I love mixing Sci-fi and fantasy so it is cool to see Bungie doing that without having to make a dumb joke about it.
 
Waning Crescent Wizards?

Wizard%20Shaped%20Moon%20Tattoo.jpg
 
It could work if they were even considering embracing the ridiculousness and insanity of the concept. But they're so far up their own ass with the lore and treating everything so seriously that something as ridiculous as that line sticks out like a sore thumb.


The only ones who could really pull off "the wizard came from the moon" are the Magicka guys. :p

Calling it a "wizard" makes sense, because while it likely has a "proper" name it feels realistic that if humanity meets a flying alien that shoots fireballs a big chunk of humanity, especially the chunk thats going to be shooting at it will refer to it by a slang/colloquial term like "wizard". Wizard feels like a more realstic thing to call it then "Grand Psychic Pontifex" or some pseudo science psychic mumbo jumbo.

I thought the voice acting was fine, it was clear and the tone felt fitting for an AI, I honestly cant see why people are calling for yet another hackeneyed "What is this emotion you humans call love?" "emotionless" voice. If I was an AI I'd probably be/sound bored as well (and honestly I thought he just sounded largely "neutral" neither particularly into it nor bored of it). An overly emotive AI would feel out of place and an "emotionless" one doesnt really jibe with a "realistic" AI for me. So netural works I think.
 
I thought the voice acting was fine, it was clear and the tone felt fitting for an AI, I honestly cant see why people are calling for yet another hackeneyed "What is this emotion you humans call love?" "emotionless" voice. If I was an AI I'd probably be/sound bored as well (and honestly I thought he just sounded largely "neutral" neither particularly into it nor bored of it). An overly emotive AI would feel out of place and an "emotionless" one doesnt really jibe with a "realistic" AI for me. So netural works I think.

Completely neutral may make sense as an AI, but as your primary narrator and essentially your guide to your identity-less guardian... 'a little pulse' might serve us well.
 
Average.

People saying Bad must not have started gaming prior to the 360/PS3 generation. Bad is almost any PS1 or PS2 game with voice acting. Bad is every Final Fantasy with voice acting. There is nothing special about Dinklage's performance that makes it either good or bad, it's just average, which is far less than that man has proven himself capable of, but it's not "bad".

its bad by today's standards, of course things were shit in the past but again that's not an excuse for poor voice work in 2014.
 
Completely neutral may make sense as an AI, but as your primary narrator and essentially your guide to your identity-less guardian... 'a little pulse' might serve us well.

I thought it suited the relatively austere world presented and would personally find an emotive AI jarring, while I can totally understand people having other preferences it seems a stretch to label the current voice bad as opposed to "not to my taste"
 
Everyone needs to watch the latest E3 trailer which has his voice digitized, I hope this is representative of the final game

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=clRpcIHpmoY

His voice work is absolutely fine with the appropriate filters/processing on top of it. I'm sure he was instructed to speak in this manner. It sounds awkward only because they haven't done anything to alter his voice for the Alpha to sound more like a robot rather than some bored guy.
 
Half of the problem is the wizard line comes out of nowhere. How does ghost even know the wizard is from the moon? Why do we care that he comes from the moon, it's a wizard...pretty cool/scary no matter where he came from. I'm sure in context of the full game it won't be so weird.
 
Everyone needs to watch the latest E3 trailer which has his voice digitized, I hope this is representative of the final game

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=clRpcIHpmoY

His voice work is absolutely fine with the appropriate filters/processing on top of it. I'm sure he was instructed to speak in this manner. It sounds awkward only because they haven't done anything to alter his voice for the Alpha to sound more like a robot rather than some bored guy.

Still doesn't change the fact that the writing is terrible.
 
I wonder how many people at Bungie and Activision are seeing all the disappointment and mockery at Dinklage's lines and performance and saying "I fucking told you so!"
 
A composer is not a voice director
Actually in the case of halo games. Marty pretty much is the unofficial voice director. He always is there during the voice recording sessions and gives actors key tips on how to deliver their lines.
 
Everyone needs to watch the latest E3 trailer which has his voice digitized, I hope this is representative of the final game

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=clRpcIHpmoY

His voice work is absolutely fine with the appropriate filters/processing on top of it. I'm sure he was instructed to speak in this manner. It sounds awkward only because they haven't done anything to alter his voice for the Alpha to sound more like a robot rather than some bored guy.

I agree with this - it sounds miles better than the Alpha - hopefully they put the digitised filter back on for the full game. I don't think we can blame Dinklage for some of the dialogue though.
 
I think most of the voice over was fine. Dinklage didn't write "wizard from the moon". The problem is, at least in the alpha, the Ghost doesn't have any character of his own. It's just the voice of the game telling you things. Going out and getting TRYION FUCKING LANNISTER is obvious stunt casting. If all they have him do is read mission objectives and some occasional lore then the person voicing the character is going to be more interesting than the character itself, which will just be distracting and awkward. I would hope that Bungie has plans for the character, and that the alpha just didn't touch on any of that.
 
Everyone needs to watch the latest E3 trailer which has his voice digitized, I hope this is representative of the final game

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=clRpcIHpmoY

His voice work is absolutely fine with the appropriate filters/processing on top of it. I'm sure he was instructed to speak in this manner. It sounds awkward only because they haven't done anything to alter his voice for the Alpha to sound more like a robot rather than some bored guy.

As long as it ends up sounding like this, I'll be satisfied. I wonder why there hasn't been a response from Bungie.
 
Top Bottom