Cheesemeister said:
I was waiting for that pic.
Cheesemeister said:
m0dus said:You seem to be missing the forest for the trees--in 'personalizing the experience,' he is referring to deciding WHAT your 360 is to do for you. A game player, or a game + HD movie player. pretty simple and straightforward.
chriskzoo said:Right and so does Sony - you can buy Blu-Ray movies, or not. The format is still needed by developers and games like Resistance prove as much.:lol
m0dus said:I don't think so. Here's the summary:
choice = (game console) vs (game console + HDdvd movie player.)
Not (HDdvd movie player) vs (Blu-ray movie player)
...wtf. Very small minority? Then who are they selling the HD ERA to?if they're fortunate enough to be the small minority right now that have the equipment to take advantage of the new generation of high-definition movie playback
Pellham said:Wait a sec, are you blaming EGM for what Peter Moore said?
blindrocket said::lol
Well I guess it was time for MS to say something stupid.
doicare said:Didn't he get the memo bluray is out selling hd dvd?
AstroLad said:Apparently this is incredibly hard to grasp.
Rhindle said:Others at Microsoft have said they may release a Blu Ray drive at some point "if the market demands it" (or something to that effect). Keeping games and movie playback separated allows them to keep their options open, while supporting HD-DVD for now.
PjotrStroganov said:While he was indeed talking about Xbox 360 vs Xbox 360 plus HDDVD drive, many of Moore's comments are about the HDDVD vs Bluray war. It's easy to make the mistake.
Look... we're not going to get embroiled in a movie-playback war. We're very clear on this. If you've already got your 360, $199 put you in the high-def movie playback scenario, but i'm not burdening the box with it as our competitor's done. This is about games. It's not about movies.
BenjaminBirdie said:Like this one?
I think we all know this, this is why we think EGM's question is FUNNY. EGM is asking, If your giving us a choice in HD movie playback, why not give us the option for Blu Ray as well?BenjaminBirdie said:Again, MS' approach to choice is whether or not you want to enter the Hi-Def Movie Disc arena AT ALL.
Mrbob said:MS just trying to muddy the HD movie market, and it pisses me off with their attempted sabotage. But it backfired because Blu Ray is currently kicking HD DVDs ass.
_leech_ said:If they don't want to get into the format war why not be neutral instead of picking a side?
BenjaminBirdie said:Don't people sabatoge something in order to gain something? What does MS' 360 positioning lose if Blu-Ray "wins"? (Keeping in mind, such victory at this point is the equivalent of, say, a Nas 12" outselling a Jay-Z 12" when measuring the Vinyl v. CD "war".)
Core407 said:Peter Moore needs to realize that HD-DVD and Blu-Ray have benefits for gamers and developers.
aeolist said:I think the better question would be whether they would make a Blu-Ray addon if HD-DVD tanks
LJ11 said:But it's not according to Moore. HD-DVD is being chosen by the consumer, or at least that's what Moore wants us to believe. They take no sides. Fair and balanced.
Mrbob said:They lose power. Sony and MS both want to be the center of your living room. Blu Ray becomes another reason to buy a PS3, then Sony sells more systems and Sony gets money that MS wants.
If MS doesn't care about the movie market, then they have two choices.
1) Not release an add on. But they already have.
2) Release a Blu Ray add on to complement the hd dvd add on.
You Are In Love (tm)TTP said:Another time, with Harrison, was like talking with a slightly more human version of Agent Smith. He has the incredible ability to formulate perfect sentences and pick the right words on the fly like some Superior Entity his feeding his brain with press releases that would normally take a year to write and polish, but here he creates them in real time (at 120fps). Awesome mind.
It's true! 100% of 360 customers who bought a high-def movie format addon for their console chose HD-DVD out of all the awesome alternatives!LJ11 said:But it's not according to Moore. HD-DVD is being chosen by the consumer, or at least that's what Moore wants us to believe. They take no sides. Fair and balanced.
LJ11 said:But it's not according to Moore. HD-DVD is being chosen by the consumer, or at least that's what Moore wants us to believe. They take no sides. Fair and balanced.
Sure they'd support Blu Ray, if it emerged as the clear winner in the market. There would be no reason not to.Mrbob said:They'll never support Blu Ray. If they would have I wouldn't have bought a PS3 as soon as I did. MS just trying to muddy the HD movie market, and it pisses me off with their attempted sabotage. But it backfired because Blu Ray is currently kicking HD DVDs ass.
Nostromo said:You Are In Love (tm)
My favorite part is how only a tiny minority of their customers have the equipment needed to use a high-def formatdrohne said:haha. that is some dizzying spin -- he's trying simultaneously to portray hd-dvd as the winner of a format war it's losing, to suggest that no one wants hd movies, and to suggest that the hd-dvd add-on is a terrific option for 360 owners. it's like a lucid dream!
BenjaminBirdie said:The consumer is choosing the HD-DVD drive, is what I'm pretty sure he was saying, especially since the next sentence was "We're not embroiling ourselves in the format war."
Rhindle said:Sure they'd support Blu Ray, if it emerged as the clear winner in the market. There would be no reason not to.
For now, there's no real downside in sticking with the HD DVD drive. It ticks off the right box on the features list, and leaves their options open.
BenjaminBirdie said:Are they "embroiling themselves" into the network war by showing CSI on Video Marketplace instead of Lost?
chriskzoo said:Right and so does Sony - you can buy Blu-Ray movies, or not. The format is still needed by developers and games like Resistance prove as much.:lol
m0dus said:Um, no. The choice is the issue of the consumer choosing to purchase what he or she will use.
Silly tanod
AdmiralViscen said:m0dus wins the thread.
Mrbob said:I guess I wouldn't care what he said if it wasn't the bold faced lie about consumers choosing HD DVD.
Consumers are actually choosing about a 70/30 ratio in favor of Blu Ray at the moment.
But whatever here is hoping this whole format mess gets done in 2007.
m0dus said:I can see a few:
-cost to manufacturer
-cost of confusing the consumer by offering 2 entirely different formats (what would be next in EGM? "Peter, why doesn't MS offer a HYBRID drive that plays both??")
-cost of having to pay your #1 rival potential licensing fees for every unit sold
Pristine_Condition said:False analogy much?
If MS could sell "Lost" and "CSI" they certainly would.
Conversely, there is nothing preventing MS from offering a Blu-ray box just like the HD DVD box, Microsoft simply refuses too.
If your analogy was reflected by the reality of the "DVD war," MS would have the ability to sell both "Lost" and "CSI" on the marketplace, but would ultimately decide to only sell "CSI." Then Microsoft would go around telling everyone that they aren't selling "Lost" on the Marketplace because it's not as good as "CSI."
m0dus said:... what?
gofreak said:m0dus missed the point that EGM was focussing on the (lack of) choice beyond your choice to have HD movies with your game console or not. MS is not supporting your choice there, you only have one.
Simple point, not much more to it.