I want to play it but it runs so bad
I said it before in the DD:O Trailer thread: I don't even need 1080p @ 60fps for the sequel. All I want is "more". More content, more enemies, more environment variety, more weapons, more classes, more skills, more quests, you get the idea. If I could ask for something in the way of engine improvements? Eliminate load times. And that's not even a deal breaker for me as long as they have a nice loading screen with beautiful art or interesting lore to read.DD is up there wither the Souls series for me. A sequel with next gen graphics and/or 60fps.. ugh.
Dark Souls ruined me for Dragon's Dogma. Just couldn't get into it.
Jump on the Monster Hunter train.
Same here.
It's kinda neat to have 2 helpers, but they keep dying and I keep re-animating them. That's pretty lame.
Opinions, man.Are you trying to get a tag? Worst post I've ever seen on GAF in many years.
Not even close.Try Gothic 2 or Risen 1.
Huh, was about to ask where I should start with this series 'cause I thought it was a sprawling list of games, but there's really only... one.
I pretty much breath RPGs but I cannot put MH down. I've only played two of their games (freedom unite and 4U) and it's amazing; so in depth.Jump on the Monster Hunter train.
Bloodborne is good but dragons dogma was a beast of its own. Soooo good and its even better when you go in blind with no expectations and find out how good the game is.
I haven't really found a substitute for DD and DD online doesn't really interest me :'(
I'm worried sick that Dragon's Dogma Online is going to lose one of the parts that made Dragon's Dogma special. I guess I'm also worried that it might not come to the west.
I don't think it's fair to compare most other RPGs to DD for one simple reason: the Devil May Cry talent that went into DD. That immediately gives it a huge advantage over other action RPGs.
Imagine if id Software decided to make an action RPG, and all of a sudden people started criticizing Mass Effect and Fallout because they don't have shooting combat as good as the id RPG. They probably never will because they don't have the experience with twitch action games that id does. The same goes for fantasy action RPG developers compared to Capcom. Every once in a while you get an aberration like Souls or Severance Blade of Darkness. These RPG developers can and have tried to take tips from action games, but have mostly failed to capture the finer nuances that probably take years of experience and a certain culture.
Action RPGs, obviously, are an attempt to combine RPGs and action games, but most are made by RPG developers that have more experience with RPGs than action games. Maybe this is just proof more action game developers should dabble in RPGs.
Actually, just look at melee combat systems in western-developed games in general. It's one area where I think Japanese developers still have the upper hand. For the most part the best western developers have been able to come up with are God of War and the Batman Arkham fighting system. Chances are, you're probably never going to see DD, Souls, Ninja Gaiden Black, or Bayonetta come out of a western team, especially not a AAA one. You might get a good imitation on the level of GOW one day.
This is why I honestly don't expect The Witcher 3's combat to be anything more than adequate, and it's still my most anticipated game of the year.
Welp, now I have to go out and buy DD.
Try Gothic 2 or Risen 1.
We know they like to copy from eachother
I see you linked the wrong song....
let me fix that error
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ooby08DEJ7I
INTO THE CLOUDS AGAIN
So sad when they changed it
It makes me feel bad to see you comparing a god tier game like Gothic 2 with the pile of shit that is DD.
I don't think Dogma had that much to write home about in its story, questing, level design, art direction, graphics and others. But the combat, specifically with the ability to climb on enemies truly is a game changer. More ARPG developer should blatantly copy such system.
This is why I don't like seeing DD threads. It makes me want a PC port so damn bad. I did over 100 hours and I'd buy it day one and do it all over again at 1080p and 60fps or higher.I keep hearing how good it is but at the same time I hear how it has performance issues on PS3... I wish Capcom would get their act together and release it on PC!
Would definitely play a full console sequel, or DDO if it comes here. Maybe Deep Down will borrow DD's combat engine as well? Do we know?
It's true.
I played the prologue of witcher 2 when it first came out, saved the game for a rainy day (boredom or no internet)
Played dragon's dogma Dark arisen in the meantime and enjoyed it immensely, it raised the bar for wrpgs in every way.
Went to finish witcher 2 a few weeks ago...
I just can't
The entire time (I gave it 10 hours before I couldn't take it anymore) I'm just bored by the awful combat and general lack of a sense of adventure compared to DD
All I could think was 'why am I playing this shit when I could just go replay DD and actually enjoy the gameplay part of an rpg'
Got 0 interest in playing witcher 3 now unless they do a total rehaul of the gameplay and combat to make it have a worthy combat system that would not look pathetic in a regular action combat game.
I'm hoping to some day find an open world sandbox game that makes me think the same about gta and co, because the crappy shooting, driving, fighting and movement mechanics in gta and its peer is unforgivable.
You should try Bloodborne, OP. The combat is excellent.
Yet of course you wont criticize DD for its subpar aspects, some of which The Witcher are far superior at.
I keep hearing how good it is but at the same time I hear how it has performance issues on PS3... I wish Capcom would get their act together and release it on PC!
Yet of course you wont criticize DD for its subpar aspects, some of which The Witcher are far superior at.
Weird. The game really didn't have anything going for it past the combat. While, yes, the combat is pretty much unmatched, every game listed here at least made me interested in the world, had good characters, and had me doing all sorts of different things. Skyrim is a mess of a different systems all put into one game and while it didn't excel at its combat, I didn't care because I had other things hooked me into the world. The Witcher has amazing world building, makes you really feel like a hunter, and gives you a really strong narrative to partake in.
Dragons Dogma made me bored past 10 hours.
I loved those first ten because of how challenging it was. It took a long time to kill a single Cyclops. Then, the curve gets all fucked and it just gets really easy really fast. I beat the true ending and all that shit so don't think I didn't play enough.
The most criminal thing and the thing I hated the most is the completely static and dead feeling the world design gave me. I think it's really bad that every enemy spawns in the same spot every single time. That chimera will always be at the top of that plateau, these goblins will always show up here, that drake will always be in this clearing. The game only ever changes it up once and then the spawns stay the same again after that. Everything about that world design just made it feel so... Lifeless. The game was neat for its combat but that's all it had going for it.
Pretty much. DDA is one of the best games of the generation. Criminally overlooked.