BruceLeeRoy
Banned
...Sorry your right Bruce I was just trying to slant this to be a console war thing.
It's okay Ricky I forgive you
...Sorry your right Bruce I was just trying to slant this to be a console war thing.
Wow. I actually did not expect this response. My question was a serious question. I'm just trying to understand why we care so much about how much these consoles sell. I care just the same. I'm obviously in the thread.
They're still big deals regardless, and certainly more exciting than a new media format, which hasn't been anything special since the move to CDs.
You were downplaying the features as "average", with no new ideas, and you were proven wrong with multiple examples. Now it's moving the goal posts to well, it's not as exciting as that first time we had online multiplayer. C'mon, really?
Wow. I actually did not expect this response. My question was a serious question. I'm just trying to understand why we care so much about how much these consoles sell. I care just the same. I'm obviously in the thread.
Wow. I actually did not expect this response. My question was a serious question. I'm just trying to understand why we care so much about how much these consoles sell. I care just the same. I'm obviously in the thread.
If the PS2 wasn't also a cheap(ish) DVD player, would it have hit 150m units? I seriously doubt it.
(..)
Again, i can't see them making a noticeable impact like the things I've mentioned from other gens.
I still don't see your point, but okay.
If it wasn't for PS3, PS4/XB1 would still probably be using DVDs so I'm glad Sony took that bullet for the industry. Digital is my preferred format but I know most still prefer to buy physical so they can sell it to Gamestop or lend/borrow from friends.Well, the great feature of having BD sure did impact the PS3 at the beginning of the last gen. Just not like Sony expected![]()
Yeah man. No reason at all its selling this much. Like where are the games man? You've got the Order 1886, Infamous Second Son, Driveclub, Bloodborne, all the multiplats. Man no games at all. An utter joke. I mean look at the indie games. Who even likes those? Resogun, Shovel Knight BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
/s
After explaining that to you, you don't get my "is this article real" comment?
Ok.
*dense*
My apologies, I guess I was hoping for some intelligent discourse. Not simply a statement that you don't feel an article is "real" because you don't agree with its content.
I'm not saying they aren't good features, or not that they're features I wouldn't enjoy myself. I just don't think to your average non-GAF non-Forum reading gamer that something like share play would contribute to sales as something like Xbox Live did.
If the PS2 wasn't also a cheap(ish) DVD player, would it have hit 150m units? I seriously doubt it.
If the PS4 didn't have shareplay, would it still be on 22.3m units? I can't imagine there being much difference.
Again, I'm not saying the new PS4 features are bad/average from a personal POV - I think they're pretty great, but from a sales POV, I can't see them making a noticeable impact like the things I've mentioned from other gens.
XB1 between 12.5 and 14.3?
lulz.
XB1 between 12.5 and 14.3?
lulz.
XB1 between 12.5 and 14.3?
lulz.
XB1 between 12.5 and 14.3?
lulz.
Well that's good, I really hope more sales = more games because the exclusive library of decent games is barren as all hell atm.
Likely above 13 million at this point. Above 14 million? No.
So play the non-exclusives, who cares
Actually those really suck for the most part unless you like indies
My apologies, I guess I was hoping for some intelligent discourse. Not simply a statement that you don't feel an article is "real" because you don't agree with its content.
My apologies. I guess i was hoping for some intelligent actual numbers of XB1. Not simply guess estimates and using that to calculate WW sales data. Not to mention removing regions (lol) from PS4's data to show the sales gap is not that bad in MS's favor.
2: 1 is reality the only question is when
At least we don't have someone in here comparing Sony to nazi Germany, like in the May PS+ thread.
No not yet. 22.3m vs around 13.0m-13.5m are the sell in numbers we can work out.
The console is still a joke when it comes to the game library. Two years in.
The way things are going can't see this success lasting long... The ball is in Sony's hands now.
Do you think PS3 has passed the 90 million sales mark yet? If they dropped the price of it (I think a price drop for it is overdue), I think it could come close to or surpass 100 million in sales.
Not just yet. It should exceed 90 million before the end of the year though.
To be honest the price of PS3 will hold sales back and due to the age of the console I wouldn't be surprised if it even fails to reach 95 million. Especially as Sony will struggle with dropping the price.
Sony noted during the financial report today that the reason their profit wasn't as high as expected was because the PS3 saw lower hardware and software sales.
During the PS2 launch the PS1 continued to sell an additional 30 million units thanks to availability in additional reasons and a low final price of $49.
During the PS3 launch the PS2 was already at a low price and much more attractive than the PS3 and so ended up selling an additional 50 million units with a final price of $99.
When the PS4 launched it was at an excellent price and sales have exploded whilst the PS3 hasn't see a price drop and that gives no one a reason to buy a PS3 at this point. The PS3 still hasn't officially dropped lower than $200 and so we've only seen an additional 7.10m units sold since the PS4 came out. I doubt that number will double before the PS3 is discontinued.
12.5M seems plausible but that 14.3M is a "hell no"Sold trough is, sold in isn't.
Would you be surprised if they decided to release a budget PS3 that has no optical disc drive, and is mainly served as a PSNow box, but still compatible with all of PS3's PSN downloads? Would there even be a market for such a device?
Misterinenja
Banned
(Today, 02:26 PM)
![]()
At least we don't have someone in here comparing Sony to nazi Germany, like in the May PS+ thread.
Sony mentioned that they have problems with cost reduction of PS3, probably because Cell and Rambus RAM are custom chips and contract with NVidia is not that good. Removing optical drive will give them ~20$ - it's not really enough to make a difference.Would you be surprised if they decided to release a budget PS3 that has no optical disc drive, and is mainly served as a PSNow box, but still compatible with all of PS3's PSN downloads? Would there even be a market for such a device?
Sold trough is, sold in isn't.
Sold trough is, sold in isn't.
It's not a question of when? Are you saying ms will just keep shipping no matter and never admit 2:1?
At least we don't have someone in here comparing Sony to nazi Germany, like in the May PS+ thread.
XB1 between 12.5 and 14.3?
lulz.
Please tell me you have a link to this .
Misterinenja
Banned
(Today, 02:26 PM)
![]()
that's not accurate. It did close the gap in U.S. PS4 is just outselling again in smaller increments every month so the gap is growing back to what it was before last Holiday season.Yeah, the most damning thing is the sales they've had that haven't helped the outselling.
HDDVD most likely.If it wasn't for PS3, PS4/XB1 would still probably be using DVDs so I'm glad Sony took that bullet for the industry. Digital is my preferred format but I know most still prefer to buy physical so they can sell it to Gamestop or lend/borrow from friends.