• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PoliGAF 2017 |OT2| Well, maybe McMaster isn't a traitor.

Status
Not open for further replies.

smokeymicpot

Beat EviLore at pool.
Not sure if posted but still funny.

C7fJz7IVYAAcbmu
 
I don't want to get my hopes up because, well, Republicans, but I wonder what our politics looks like come Thursday if Ryan is forced to pull the bill or AHCA comes to a vote and doesn't pass.

Somehow, I doubt congressman will be met with overwhelming public outrage over sparing 20 million people from losing their healthcare. In fact, I predict that there will be much cheering.

So then what happens? The threat of Trump busted as congressman realize that they can oppose him and live to tell the tale? The curtain gets pulled back on Paul Ryan and he finally loses his undeserved wonkish mystique?

And if both of these things happen? What happens to Trump and Russia? If the Republicans in congress lose their fear of Trump...
This is a really interesting point.

District by district the math might get a bit foggier, but what leverage does Trump really have here? He's the only president to fail to get the popular vote in both the primary and the general election. Sure, his base are the ones who will be riled up to vote in a primary, but Congresspeople rarely go down in primaries because they're fairly anonymous. But it can hurt them big in the general election.

Why should any Republican in a district that's even remotely swingy fall on their sword for a shitty healthcare bill no one likes being pushed by a shitty president no one likes? It's stupid.

Bomp bomp.
 

~Kinggi~

Banned
Msnbc reporting Freedom Caucus is killing TrumpCare tonight. Two days ahead of schedule. Yay teaparty

This could be good if only for Trumps massive ego not allowing him to let it go and start a war within his own party. But then i think maybe this just leads to an even worse bill, cause arent these guys not on board cause it isnt bad enough?
 
Msnbc reporting Freedom Caucus is killing TrumpCare tonight. Two days ahead of schedule. Yay teaparty

Reading Twitter and comments on news sites, I was surprised to consistently see most of the FC's base wants nothing less than a full repeal of the ACA with no replacement. They seem to just want to go back to what we had before Obamacare came along and screwed everything up. Well, except for the usual crap like tort reform and selling insurance across state lines.
 

B-Dubs

No Scrubs
This is great news. Georgia needs to be a big target going forward.

Yea, Georgia can and will flip under the right circumstances. There's a lot to be gained on every level by putting money into the state.

Not sure if posted but still funny.

C7fJz7IVYAAcbmu

Love me some NY tabloid paper headlines. No one does it better :lol

EDIT: My only gripe is they used a US flag pin and not a Russian flag one.
 
This could be good if only for Trumps massive ego not allowing him to let it go and start a war within his own party. But then i think maybe this just leads to an even worse bill, cause arent these guys not on board cause it isnt bad enough?

The current bill literally makes more people lose insurance than if the ACA were completely repealed with no replacement, I cannot even imagine something worse than the AHCA.

Also, get fucked Trump. How's that Art of the Deal going?
 

Stinkles

Clothed, sober, cooperative
This could be good if only for Trumps massive ego not allowing him to let it go and start a war within his own party. But then i think maybe this just leads to an even worse bill, cause arent these guys not on board cause it isnt bad enough?

Their own president threatened to primary them if they didn't vote for an objectively shitty plan "Trump" doesn't even like, because the establishment is going to abandon him unless he passes this and a supreme court nominee. This is important because if either or both of those fail, trump will be quickly abandoned.

It's a last chance for multiple moving parts. Including Trump himself.
 

Drkirby

Corporate Apologist
Any opinions on Gorsuch? I listened to about an hour of his testimony on the radio throughout the day. The parts I heard sounded fine.
 

B-Dubs

No Scrubs
Any opinions on Gorsuch? I listened to about an hour of his testimony on the radio throughout the day. The parts I heard sounded fine.

There's worse picks, he keeps the court where it was before Scalia died, but what I keep coming back to is Garland got done dirty and deserved a hearing at least.
 
...then why wasn't a Democrat on the ballot?

a bizarre comedy of errors.

The special election was being held in the first place because the incumbent was being convicted of something or other and held on to her seat for dear life instead of resigning so someone could run in the regular election back in November. Guess she really needed those couple extra months of paychecks.

The second individual selected to run TECHNICALLY didn't actually live in the district- he just owned a house there that he did not live in, and only sporadically paid utilities on because the 197 district is a complete shithole. He was challenged on this and lost.

A third individual attempted to run once #2 was disqualified, but missed a filing deadline by 2 days or something similar.

the republican never had a shot. it was always going to be a democrat, no one was just sure who would generate a majority of the write in ballot.
 
Any opinions on Gorsuch? I listened to about an hour of his testimony on the radio throughout the day. The parts I heard sounded fine.

he's not good by any means, but literally ANY nominee will move the court leftward from the dumpster fire that was Antonin Scalia.

From a legal perspective the man was a complete disgrace in every way possible only matched by Clarence Thomas.

however, there's not really a good reason for democrats to vote for him- since it's extremely unlikely that McConnell will blow up the filibuster over this. There's nothing but upside for democrats to show some spine and tell Trump to fuck off and come back with someone better.

With a better president? even president pence? I could see McConnell taking the risk and nuking the filibuster- but Trump is so toxic not having ANY cover to stop toxic shit from flowing through the house is not a good look for him or any other senator.
 

Surfinn

Member
So is this like at 1% in terms of passing on Thursday? Seems like it's getting a last minute pull of support and we're not even at Wednesday yet.
 
So this is on track for the biggest week of Ls so far, correct?


also lol Tillerson:

So why, then, did he want the gig?

“I didn’t want this job. I didn’t seek this job.” He paused to let that sink in.

A beat or two passed before an aide piped up to ask him why he said yes.

“My wife told me I’m supposed to do this.”

After watching the contortions of my face as I tried to figure out what to say next, he humbly explained that he had never met the president before the election. As president-elect, Trump wanted to have a conversation with Tillerson “about the world” given what he gleaned from the complex global issues he dealt with as CEO of Exxon Mobil.

http://ijr.com/2017/03/814687-trumps-diplomat/
 
Vladimir Putin with 90% of the vote.

Isn't that low for him?

Just heard on NPR the vote is planned for Thursday. I expect them to back out when Thursday rolls around. The buzz has only gotten worse that they don't have the votes. The only reason I can think of for them holding a vote is to act as a Party Purity Test, to try and shame Republicans that won't fall in line.

That's not a bad play if you're starting position is right now (i.e. the bill's already out there, so no taking it back). Might as well threaten to primary dissenters and then when the vote happens, see who gets scared and who doesn't. In particular, it's the moderates to watch out for. If the Freedom Caucus is the only reason this shit doesn't pass, that's bad. It means a worse bill will pass with their support. If some moderates (maybe some of those Reps in Clinton districts who ran unopposed) flip and they're a decent chunk of the "No" votes, then Ryan has no choice but to attempt to patch his coalition together.

That last part has to happen anyway, I think, so if you're Paul Ryan, it's probably better to identify exactly who you need to bring together.

This is a really interesting point.

District by district the math might get a bit foggier, but what leverage does Trump really have here? He's the only president to fail to get the popular vote in both the primary and the general election. Sure, his base are the ones who will be riled up to vote in a primary, but Congresspeople rarely go down in primaries because they're fairly anonymous. But it can hurt them big in the general election.

Why should any Republican in a district that's even remotely swingy fall on their sword for a shitty healthcare bill no one likes being pushed by a shitty president no one likes? It's stupid.

Bomp bomp.

Yeah, exactly. For all of the mocking our side did in '04 about Dubya's "mandate" he at least had a popular vote win to argue from. Trump's got dick; literally most people hate him, including people that ended up voting for him. He has less appeal than Obama had in 2010. And his constant gaffe-ing is just making it worse. The guy is literally enjoying the easiest time period of any presidency and he's stuck around the high 30s, low 40s. If something bad happens that's entirely on the executive, he'll look even worse.

There's nothing at all to fear from telling Trump to go fuck himself. No political blowback at all.
 
The more I read his twitter feed the more I'm digging khalid, hope he wins the runoff.

https://twitter.com/khalidCares/status/843425311857479680

KHALID‏ @khalidCares

Thank you #Jesus for not being a #Republican #Matthew25:40

KHALID‏ @khalidCares

#Jesus was a #Socialist.
And as a follower of Christ, so am I. #Matthew9:35 #KHALIDforSouthFulton –

I saw someone, Jamelle Bouie maybe, mentioned that a left surge in the South would be much more religious than mainstream Democrats.
 
Yeah, exactly. For all of the mocking our side did in '04 about Dubya's "mandate" he at least had a popular vote win to argue from. Trump's got dick; literally most people hate him, including people that ended up voting for him. He has less appeal than Obama had in 2010. And his constant gaffe-ing is just making it worse. The guy is literally enjoying the easiest time period of any presidency and he's stuck around the high 30s, low 40s. If something bad happens that's entirely on the executive, he'll look even worse.

There's nothing at all to fear from telling Trump to go fuck himself. No political blowback at all.
I just really wish Boehner had taken better charge of his caucus during Obama's second term. Four years of actual progress and legislation (even if some of it wasn't necessarily good, but there would be a trade-off) among politicians actually interested in getting stuff done, rather than having the Freedom Caucus point a gun at his head the whole time.

Ryan has no flexibility in his ideology, it's either his Randian dystopia or nothing. Given the options I'd take nothing.

My best hope for this country is that Trump and Ryan are both massive failures and we return to some sense of normalcy with the Republican Party. I'd love if liberals just ran everything for the next forty years, but I know that's not reality, there needs to be two rational parties for our country to work.
 
Oh my god, Cheri Honkala's twitter is literally from a conspiratorial insane person.

This is video. Like, maybe if this is actually happened (which, maybe it totally did!), don't do this? -- https://twitter.com/vbsurf85/status/844386554864795648

Like, what?

@CheriHonkala
Ready to admit, @TheDLCC, that rallying people to Emilio because a Republican threat were lies? You were trying to stop a progressive again.

C7fGtgzWsAAN3JN.jpg

lol

@CheriHonkala
Hearing the accounts of voter intimidation today, 1 volunteer said, "We saw the same kind of things against @BernieSanders ��" @OurRevolution

Just a reminder that even if you win, Cheri, you still have to work with Democrats!

Why can't progressive 3rd parties be like the Vermont Progressive Party? Why? Why is it hard to not be insane.

EDIT: omg this poor election commissioner from Philly https://twitter.com/Commish_Schmidt (Schmidt is a Republican because there has to be at least one minority party on the commission. So he has NO skin in this game).
 

East Lake

Member
The more I read his twitter feed the more I'm digging khalid, hope he wins the runoff.

https://twitter.com/khalidCares/status/843425311857479680





I saw someone, Jamelle Bouie maybe, mentioned that a left surge in the South would be much more religious than mainstream Democrats.
He might get countered with Matthew 20.

The Parable of the Workers in the Vineyard

1“For the kingdom of heaven is like a landowner who went out early in the morning to hire workers for his vineyard. 2He agreed to pay them a denariusa for the day and sent them into his vineyard.

3“About nine in the morning he went out and saw others standing in the marketplace doing nothing. 4He told them, ‘You also go and work in my vineyard, and I will pay you whatever is right.’ 5So they went.

“He went out again about noon and about three in the afternoon and did the same thing. 6About five in the afternoon he went out and found still others standing around. He asked them, ‘Why have you been standing here all day long doing nothing?’

7“ ‘Because no one has hired us,’ they answered.

“He said to them, ‘You also go and work in my vineyard.’

8“When evening came, the owner of the vineyard said to his foreman, ‘Call the workers and pay them their wages, beginning with the last ones hired and going on to the first.’

9“The workers who were hired about five in the afternoon came and each received a denarius. 10So when those came who were hired first, they expected to receive more. But each one of them also received a denarius. 11When they received it, they began to grumble against the landowner. 12‘These who were hired last worked only one hour,’ they said, ‘and you have made them equal to us who have borne the burden of the work and the heat of the day.’

13“But he answered one of them, ‘I am not being unfair to you, friend. Didn’t you agree to work for a denarius? 14Take your pay and go. I want to give the one who was hired last the same as I gave you. 15Don’t I have the right to do what I want with my own money? Or are you envious because I am generous?’

16“So the last will be first, and the first will be last.”
 
I mean what's the mechanism they're doing this through if not a vote? Holding Ryan hostage until he agrees not to bring it to the floor?

Voting it down would be worse than not voting on it at all. The Republicans have a majority, and if they can't get a bill through that reflects so poorly on them. It would signal to most people that Republicans clearly don't want to govern at all, and if that's the case why the fuck are they in Congress?
 
He might get countered with Matthew 20.

Yeah, there was good editorial in my university's newspaper one time that mentioned this. Some guy was standing around yelling about how our sinful lifestyles of homosexuality and whatnot was going to get us all damned, and a bunch of counter-protestors were holding signs like "this isn't real Christianity" and stuff.

The editorial was basically "no, this guy is actually being pretty Biblical. Accept that you disagree with it and move on, don't act like it's a progressive text."
 

pigeon

Banned
The Devil can quote scripture to his purpose

Which is just another way of saying the Bible contradicts itself constantly
 

royalan

Member
The more I read his twitter feed the more I'm digging khalid, hope he wins the runoff.

https://twitter.com/khalidCares/status/843425311857479680





I saw someone, Jamelle Bouie maybe, mentioned that a left surge in the South would be much more religious than mainstream Democrats.

Yes, because the gag is black people as a group are very religious. And our brand of conservatism really aught to be studied


EDIT: Although, I'm not understanding the interpretation of the Parable of the Workers in the Vinyard. I've always read it as pretty progressive.
 
For what it's worth, The only texts in the Bible that explicitly call out Homosexuality is in the OT, which is technically part of Jewish Law that the Apostle Paul argued did not apply to Gentiles(See also Circumcision). The verses from the New Testament that "Condemns homosexuals" are written by Paul and use terminology that could have meant a variety of things in Ancient Greek.

Wikipedia said:
The presumed references to 'homosexuality' itself in the New Testament hinge on the interpretation of three specific Greek words: arsenokoitēs (ἀρσενοκοίτης), malakos (μαλακός), and porneia (πορνεία) and its cognates

Like, there's an entire page on Wikipedia dedicated to both arguments for and against these words as "Homosexual"within the context of the letters.

He might get countered with Matthew 20.
Except that is probably as close to "Socialism" as you can get in the Bible, considering Socialism is a 19th Century Ideology. It's a stupid exercise much in the way that you can't really say that the writings of Justinian's legal reforms in the Byzantines would make him support Healthcare Reform. I get the original point(that Jesus has been corrupted by Evangelicals into "Supply Side Jesus", who espouses the values of Hayek and Rand) but the analogy is bad.

Like, the parable is "Everyone should get paid the same, regardless of their prior rank"(Much like other parables, there's a lot of subtext, especially since Matthew 20 is a continuation of Jesus's talk about the rich in Matthew 19.) I can't imagine a world where This section proceeding it is judged as "Promoting Capitalism.

Matthew 19 said:
23 Then Jesus said to his disciples, “Truly I tell you, it is hard for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of heaven. 24 Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God.”

25 When the disciples heard this, they were greatly astonished and asked, “Who then can be saved?”

26 Jesus looked at them and said, “With man this is impossible, but with God all things are possible.”

27 Peter answered him, “We have left everything to follow you! What then will there be for us?”

28 Jesus said to them, “Truly I tell you, at the renewal of all things, when the Son of Man sits on his glorious throne, you who have followed me will also sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel. 29 And everyone who has left houses or brothers or sisters or father or mother or wife[e] or children or fields for my sake will receive a hundred times as much and will inherit eternal life. 30 But many who are first will be last, and many who are last will be first.
He's also comparing Heaven to this system, for "The First Shall be Last in the Kingdom of God".
 
Oh my god, Cheri Honkala's twitter is literally from a conspiratorial insane person.

This is video. Like, maybe if this is actually happened (which, maybe it totally did!), don't do this? -- https://twitter.com/vbsurf85/status/844386554864795648

Like, what?



lol



Just a reminder that even if you win, Cheri, you still have to work with Democrats!

Why can't progressive 3rd parties be like the Vermont Progressive Party? Why? Why is it hard to not be insane.

EDIT: omg this poor election commissioner from Philly https://twitter.com/Commish_Schmidt (Schmidt is a Republican because there has to be at least one minority party on the commission. So he has NO skin in this game).
On the one hand, having a third party state legislator is kind of interesting and also makes for prettier representations of the state legislature.

On the other hand, crazy people being in positions of power is not good.

He might get countered with Matthew 20.
I don't get what that has to do with capitalism/socialism though? That's explicitly a metaphor about God, Jesus isn't saying that people should just do whatever they want with their money. He told people what do with their money all the time! God, on the other hand, has explicit dominion over everything, because he's God!

The Devil can quote scripture to his purpose

Which is just another way of saying the Bible contradicts itself constantly
Also this lol
 

royalan

Member
Except that is probably as close to "Socialism" as you can get in the Bible, considering Socialism is a 19th Century Ideology.

Like, the parable is "Everyone should get paid the same, regardless of their prior rank"(Much like other parables, there's a lot of subtext, especially since Matthew 20 is a continuation of Jesus's talk about the rich in Matthew 19.

Exactly.
 

B-Dubs

No Scrubs
Oh my god, Cheri Honkala's twitter is literally from a conspiratorial insane person.

This is video. Like, maybe if this is actually happened (which, maybe it totally did!), don't do this? -- https://twitter.com/vbsurf85/status/844386554864795648

Like, what?



lol



Just a reminder that even if you win, Cheri, you still have to work with Democrats!

Why can't progressive 3rd parties be like the Vermont Progressive Party? Why? Why is it hard to not be insane.

EDIT: omg this poor election commissioner from Philly https://twitter.com/Commish_Schmidt (Schmidt is a Republican because there has to be at least one minority party on the commission. So he has NO skin in this game).

Unfortunately New England seems to be the only part of the country that has non-insane third-parties. I suppose it's something to do with the culture up there, the whole birthplace of the revolution I suppose.
 
On the one hand, having a third party state legislator is kind of interesting and also makes for prettier representations of the state legislature.

On the other hand, crazy people being in positions of power is not good.

I mean, look, I love colors. I also love having voting systems with more parties that aren't like the United States's! Green and Yellow are great colors!

Just crazy people are bad. And the left has conspiratorial elements that make me extremely uncomfortable.
 
Yes, because the gag is black people as a group are very religious. And our brand of conservatism really aught to be studied


EDIT: Although, I'm not understanding the interpretation of the Parable of the Workers in the Vinyard. I've always read it as pretty progressive.
Yeah I think the idea is that the left in the South will look more and more like Reverend Barber and the Moral Monday movement type stuff and less like the progressives of the northeast or west.
 
Msnbc reporting Freedom Caucus is killing TrumpCare tonight. Two days ahead of schedule. Yay teaparty

The behind the scenes accounts will be fun. And you know Trump is gonna be attacking republicans in Friday or Saturday morning tweets...

At this point I'm starting to wonder if they'll even be able to cut taxes. This is a disaster.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom