electricpirate
Member
PhoenixDark said:I wonder how this election would have looked if democrats had reduced the medicare age requirement to 55 and held the vote on the Bush tax cuts.
Exactly the same.
PhoenixDark said:I wonder how this election would have looked if democrats had reduced the medicare age requirement to 55 and held the vote on the Bush tax cuts.
And it cost the Repubs the Senate and may cost them not only the Presidency in 2012 but may just bring down the Repub party altogether.ggnoobIGN said:Remember when everyone was reporting the Republican's party death 2 years ago? lol
Love it or hate it, the Tea Party has been the most influential political movement in this country in pretty much decades. Even if some of their candidates lost, it acted as a great calling card for a lot of people.
That is sort of the point of the senate, but I will admit it could use some reworking since it was made with there was being only about 15 states instead of 50, and most of the states had sizable populations for there area.GhaleonEB said:The two Senator system dramatically inflates the power of small states. I can't remember the exact stat, but it's something like, states totaling 10% of the population have half the Senators. That tilts national policy toward interests of the very few.
That's pretty ridiculous.PhoenixDark said:It also cost republicans the senate,
I'm familiar with the history of the Senate.Evil Benius said:That was kind of the point when the system was developed.
GhaleonEB said:I'm familiar with the history of the Senate.
It also means the two Dakotas have as much power in the Senate - and thus the entire legislature - as New York and California combined, which is a pretty bad way to run a democracy.
If the right is only as to the people, the government can therefore censor television, newspapers, and the internet without recourse.empty vessel said:It's bolded. Unless you think corporations have religion, the amendment is clearly, and explicitly, about people.
A corporation is not a speaker's "affiliation." It is a separate entity with its own legal and financial existence. We are not talking about a person's speech. Citizens United was specifically about a corporate entity's speech. You seem to not know what a corporation is.
Mr. Haridopolos is a Republican, to be clear.But for the states Democrats, Ms. Sinks defeat may be the hardest to take. Many had said that a Sink victory would establish an important beachhead against a conservative storm. Instead, Mr. Scott, a former hospital chain executive who spent $73 million of his own money on his campaign and who has never served in any public or civic office will oversee a state government that has shifted substantially to the right.
Its a real opportunity for us, said Mike Haridopolos, the state Senate president. Hell have the most conservative Senate since the 1860s.
ToxicAdam said:It's your right to be that cynical. I can't take that away from you. But, in some of those districts, there was no benefit in having a minority run in those positions. Especially in those deep southern states, it might even be a detriment.
Regardless of what you think is the intention, it's still a minority assuming a role previously held by whites for centuries. It's still a real person in a real position of power making a difference in the world. So, not only did they have to overcome all the prejudices and stereotypes that hold back people of their own color, but they have to overcome the small-mindedness of their own community that sneers at them as a sell-out or an Uncle Tom. Just because they didn't intellectually "get in line" with the rest.
I would rather celebrate minority achievement than attempt to diminish them for cheap political gain. mckmas gets it, maybe you will one day too.
Oh, I agree. And while I didn't come out and say it, that was the point I was getting at.NewLib said:This country is not a democracy.
RurouniZel said:We Americans are like battered spouses. No matter how abused we get, we stick it out. Then we reach a point where, only for a little while, we leave our abusive spouse for someone who actually cares and loves us.
But then, they come back with flowers and apologies. "Give me another chance! I've changed, believe me!". And every time, without fail, we believe them. We want to believe them. No matter how many times the cycle repeats, we want to believe.
JayDubya said:1st Amendment stuff.
Punctuation and wording matters. Ask any governor with broad based veto powers.TL4E said:Sounds pretty desperate that you're relying on punctuation to make your case.
eznark said:The right to peaceably assemble is clearly about people. The clauses before however are clearly separated by punctuation.
Yeah. Tea party cost Republicans the Senate, but they are in better position for 2012 Presidency. Because, if economy continue to struggle, they won't get as much of the blame. Democrats will still get more of the blame since they still control 2/3.PhoenixDark said:It also cost republicans the senate, and could cost when the presidency in 2012.
True, and I'm not making a serious argument to be clear. I'm making the argument of the left on the second amendment.leroidys said:I'm not going to wade into the actual argument at the moment, but the usage of punctuation was significantly different now than it was then. If one is to go hardcore originalist, you have to consider things like that as well.
obijkenobi said:Unless I missed something, it looks like there weren't be any Hispanics in Michigan's state legislature for at least two years.![]()
You have to look at the Tea Party's effects well beyond simply losing a few senate races last night. The movement rallied the entire GOP party to go out and vote and take back the country. Thad profound effects across the board, which I'm sure even attributed to other, non Tea Party Repubs winning last night.knitoe said:Yeah. Tea party cost Republicans the Senate,
Evlar said:Gotta love this quote on the Florida legislature:
But for the states Democrats, Ms. Sinks defeat may be the hardest to take. Many had said that a Sink victory would establish an important beachhead against a conservative storm. Instead, Mr. Scott, a former hospital chain executive who spent $73 million of THE MONEY HE STOLE FROM MEDICARE on his campaign and who has never served in any public or civic office will oversee a state government that has shifted substantially to the right.
Its a real opportunity for us, said Mike Haridopolos, the state Senate president. Hell have the most conservative Senate since the 1860s.
Mr. Haridopolos is a Republican, to be clear.
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/11/03/sink-concedes-in-florida-governors-race/
How do people fall for the idea that $140k a year for a household is middle class? Especially here in MN. The median home price in Minneapolis is ~$210K iirc, and falling
StopMakingSense said:In other news, Carly Fiorina, despite being 700k votes and 10 points down, with 93% reporting, has not conceded yet.
She should have tried that when HP's board voted to fire her.
elrechazao said:If the right is only as to the people, the government can therefore censor television, newspapers, and the internet without recourse.
Wait, it can't, and your analysis flies in the face of the amendment, and over 200 years of interpretations of it by the courts. ..
I said it earlier, passing the voter ID bill in Wisconsin significantly changes Midwest Democratic strategy. I can't imagine there will be volunteers from all the neighboring states flocking to Wisconsin for get out the vote efforts.elrechazao said:Biggest story nobody's really talking about is the GOP controlling more state legislatures than they have since the 20's. That is going to have a huge effect on gerrymandering and whatnot that will impact 2012 in a much bigger way than the GOP having the senate might have.
What is you definition of "middle"? Median household income in the US is $50,000. That "middle class" household would make nearly three times the national average.ToxicAdam said:Two teaching salaries can be about 140k (if they have some time under their belt). I would call them middle class, no matter where they live in the country.
elrechazao said:Biggest story nobody's really talking about is the GOP controlling more state legislatures than they have since the 20's. That is going to have a huge effect on gerrymandering and whatnot that will impact 2012 in a much bigger way than the GOP having the senate might have.
06nbarnhill said:Not really. I found a blog on electoral-vote.com breaking it down by state and the republicans (with their gains) are only likely to pick up 5 seats via Gerrymandering (or less. Gerrymandering has a history of being poorly done and actually costing seats).
kylej said:The Republicans won Michigan. Of course there won't be any brown people.
06nbarnhill said:Not really. I found a blog on electoral-vote.com breaking it down by state and the republicans (with their gains) are only likely to pick up 5 seats via Gerrymandering (or less. Gerrymandering has a history of being poorly done and actually costing seats).
It would have been very close. Voter turnout among Dems would have been depressed somewhat.Kusagari said:So, looks like Rubio will win with 49%. If Meek had dropped out before early voting started could Crist have won?
Can you say awkward....PhoenixDark said:
eznark said:Feingold and Barrett both did the same last night. Sore losers the lot.
This bears repeating, toxicadam: while I don't know where exactly a household with $140k stands, I do know that the top quintile of households had incomes exceeding $91.7k back in 2006, and the top 7.5% of households had incomes over $150K. Households making $140k or more are most likely the top duodecimitile or tredecimitile (top 1/12th or top 1/13th). How can even the least wealthy of these households be considered middle class, when they're wealthier than ~92% of the nation?GhaleonEB said:What is you definition of "middle"? Median household income in the US is $50,000. That "middle class" household would make nearly three times the national average.
GaimeGuy said:This bears repeating, toxicadam: while I don't know where exactly a household with $140k stands...