D
Deleted member 775630
Unconfirmed Member
Difference is that I'm clearly saying, in my opinion and not telling it as if it's the gospel. Like I said, it doesn't make sense in both directions.But you're giving your own twist right there -- claiming to know what AMD would or wouldn't put on a slide. I do not comprehend why you're splitting hairs over someone else doing the same thing, and arguably they are sticking closer to the numbers we have while you are speculating why the numbers aren't as accurate as your head-sales.
I agree, that it can go both ways, and that we just don't know. And sure for you the logic can be sound, I'm pretty sure there are a lot of other people that will say your logic is yours, and as long as we don't have actual numbers it's purely your logic and guess work.Non-sequitur. It's just as clear that people for some weird reason want Xbox to sell more because of some weird affiliation toward Microsoft. That has no bearing on the substance of our conversation.
I think the logic is pretty straightforward:
If Sony sold 110+ million (pretty reasonable considering they sold 108.9 million more than two months ago),
and if AMD is telling the truth about selling over 150 million between the two platforms,
then the Xbox One sold 40 million, or thereabouts.
Like I mentioned before, it's possible AMD sold 151 or even 156 million, but the only way for Xbox One to be at 50 million would be if AMD sold over 160 million units. I'm not saying I am correct. Perhaps I am leaving out very important data, but the logic is sound if this is the info we're working with.