It'd be really cool if he could reprise his role. I'm sure he's available...i bet this guy owns allcreatureshaverights.com
How many side female characters will be brutally killed, despite giving the audience no reason to want them or expect them to die in this one. I'm guessing 3.
They feel a certain responsibility to the animals. I wonder what responsibility they feel for the thousands of people that died when they opened the giant doors to a dinosaur cage, because they are both the 2 biggest fucking idiots on planet earth, that led to the dino escaping and going on a rampage.
That's not what happened lol
And even at that, who's to say the movie wont touch on the responsibility for the loss of human life. I suspect it will.
That's not what happened lol
We've regressed.
How many side female characters will be brutally killed, despite giving the audience no reason to want them or expect them to die in this one.
that's not how it played at all. They tried to paint her as a 'bad person' since she was not doing her job perfectly, so in film terms she then 'deserved' a slow, violent horrible death. It was disgraceful, if not really sexist.That was the point of Zara dying, though. It was unexpected.
It didn't work, but it definitely was not due to some nefarious sexism on the part of the writers or director.
They literally went inside first, and then checked the gps which let them know it was still inside. Only complete idiots would go in before checking the gps. So yes that is what happened.
At least the marketing isn't #Alldinosaursmatter
There's literally no reason for them to think the Indominus was still in there as they had absolutely no idea it could camo. So the guys went into the cage to investigate as Claire hurried to get in touch with Lowery, who then confirmed that it was indeed still in the cage.
What info was going to be divined by them walking into the enclosure? Chris Pratt to other dude: "Yep, those are scratches on a wall. Glad I walked in here". Why would you not just wait until you confirmed it wasn't in there with the gps?
And unless everyone around the enclosure was blind and deaf there is literality every reason to believe it was still in there. There is a zero percent chance not one person saw or heard a giant dinosaur climb over a giant wall and jump down on the other side.
Not a bad premise, although Jurassic World was so abysmal it's hard for me to really care how it'll end up playing out.
Also, the original Jurassic Park was built over an active volcano?
that's not how it played at all. They tried to paint her as a 'bad person' since she was not doing her job perfectly, so in film terms she then 'deserved' a slow, violent horrible death. It was disgraceful, if not really sexist.
Didn't you hear Sam Neill tell you that they're not big lizards?!As long as there are folks getting brutally eaten by big lizards I'll go see it.
In the original movie Nedry literally stammers through his reasoning as to why some of the fences might go down, was sweating, etc. and they didn't suspect anything? Tim closes the car door with the Rex standing next to it, which would have obviously gotten its attention and like shutting a door is going to help them! There's shit like this in everything.
They didn't exactly go around asking personnel if they heard something or whatever, they were trying to figure out what the hell happened.
The point where you realize how shoehorned in the San Diego rampage was is when he didn't get eaten there. Seriously, this might be TLW's big missed opportunity.I wonder if the guy who made fun of Malcom in the beginning of The Lost World felt ever sorry for his words and deeds.
After Henry Wu was spirited away in the aftermath of Jurassic World's chaos, he was relocated to another facility in the Andaman archipelago. Once again, another island becomes INGEN's ace in the hole, and amid another menagerie of prehistoric beasts, Wu brings back one of the great hunters long since deemed extinct...
Then why did she get a two minute long extreme violence-porn death? Far more painful and slow than any other death on the franchise? In normal film language that is punishment.That's really a stretch, dude. Nowhere in the film does it ever show her as someone other than a person that two characters evade at an opportune moment. She's barely even a character.
Like I said, I have issues with how they handled Zara, but to paint some malicious manspiracy on it is really naive.
As long as there are folks getting brutally eaten by biglizardsbirds I'll go see it.
Then why did she get a two minute long extreme violence-porn death? Far more painful and slow than any other death on the franchise? In normal film language that is punishment.
Ugh, it's not a 'random surprise' when it's done as a semi-comedy routine where she is passed amongst several dinos before finally being eaten by the giant one. The film made a point that this particular death was super horrible in a very unlikely way.She died because dinosaurs are animals and animals don't give a damn who you are. The whole point was that horrible things can happen to people who really don't deserve it.
From Trevorrow himself: And Zara was about trying to surprise moviegoers, who I think can see everything coming, Trevorrow said. We're all screenwriters. We're all screenwriters, and an earned death that's a screenwriting term to me, unearned death is the definition of terror.
I think you'll enjoy movies more if you stop thinking there are set rules that decide how, why and when things happen.
And you have to obey the understood language of film, especially in a blockbuster.
The execution is part of it, they are intertwined. It would be fine if she was just snatched quickly. Instead the movie clearly makes a big point about her death being especially horrific.And by language you mean rules saying gruesome, elaborate and pointless death must fall on deserving victim? I feel like I'm missing something here, because everything you say flies in the face of creativity itself.
I mean, we're not discussing the execution here, we're talking about whether or not it's legal under the universal law of film?
Then why did she get a two minute long extreme violence-porn death? Far more painful and slow than any other death on the franchise? In normal film language that is punishment.
The execution is part of it, they are intertwined. It would be fine if she was just snatched quickly. Instead the movie clearly makes a big point about her death being especially horrific.
That one was half as long, and at least wasn't silly, it was just two animals killing something somewhat realistically, not a rube-goldberg style completely impossible series of events where the victim is passed among five separate attacking animals.Her death really bothered me but probably because it was also so drawn out
but technically it wasn't much worse than
might just be the tone throwing it off so much.
Umm, thats Eddie Carr who was in the process of saving the entire cast.Also, that was the bad guy, he was a prick who just abandoned two children.
Yeah my bad I edited.Umm, thats Eddie Carr who was in the process of saving the entire cast.
I mean im agreeing with youYeah my bad I edited.
Yeah totally. And on top of that she was painted as a 'minor' villain by the movie due to letting the kids get away. If she was a clear good guy it would just be a horror thing, if poorly done.I mean im agreeing with you
but for me the execution was what ruins the whole scene.
Like I think it had the tone of a satisfactory villain death which was just weird
Had it felt more horror-ish as Eddie's had it would have somewhat worked.
(especially when its easily the worst in the movie)