• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Possible predecessor to Da Vinci’s Mona Lisa unveiled

Status
Not open for further replies.
GENEVA — The mystery behind the most enigmatic smile in art — Leonardo da Vinci’s “Mona Lisa” — just got a little more complicated.

In a coming-out party of sorts in Geneva, rounds of flashbulbs popped Thursday as the non-profit Mona Lisa Foundation pulled back the curtain to present what it claims is a predecessor of the world’s most famous portrait.

But even the experts brought in by the foundation weren’t sure about that claim just yet.

The art world is prone to all sorts of rumours and speculation — and, periodically — discoveries that jolt accepted norms. Two years ago, a retired French electrician claimed that he had turned up 271 Picasso works that had been sitting for decades in his garage — and Picasso’s heirs claimed theft.
But a new claim about the world’s most famous painting, which draws millions of visitors to Paris’ Louvre Museum each year, resonates like a thunderclap in the art world. It also prompts a new look at a painting that all by itself still raises a lot of questions for experts — not least the timeless, “Is she smiling or not?”

The “Isleworth Mona Lisa” features a dark-haired young woman with her arms crossed against a distant backdrop. The foundation insists it’s no copy but an earlier version of the Louvre masterpiece.

At the presentation, Alessandro Vezzosi, director of the Museo Ideale Leonardo da Vinci, said the painting was intriguing but needs further study. He declined to line up behind the foundation’s claims that it was truly a “Mona Lisa” predecessor painted by da Vinci.

“The Isleworth Mona Lisa is an important work of art deserving respect and strong consideration — as well as a scientific, historic and artistic debate among specialists rather than a purely media interest,” he said.

“Scientific tests don’t demonstrate the authenticity [and] the autography of a painting, but demonstrate it’s from a certain era, whether the techniques are similar or not,” Vezzosi told The Associated Press in French. “Here, there are many open questions,” before waving his hand over the painting, as a security guard with folded arms stood nearby.


More here: http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/09/28/isleworth-mona-lisa-possible-predecessor-to-da-vincis-most-famous-portrait-unveiled/

the-two-mona-lisas.jpg


This is incredibly exciting. Do you think it's real GAF?
 

oxrock

Gravity is a myth, the Earth SUCKS!
The two faces look like different women though. I mean they're dressed and posed the same but the faces just don't line up. The original has more of an elongated oval shaped head.

Edit: By original I mean the one accepted as being da vinci's work shown on the right in the op.
 

Sealda

Banned
The two faces look like different women though. I mean they're dressed and posed the same but the faces just don't line up. The original has more of an elongated oval shaped head.

no they don't. Eyes, moth and nose all look the same. Actually, the only thing that is the different is the face form. Everything else is freaking the same!

Ever seen 2 portraits of the same guy looking the same? Its always like this with painted portraits...

I bet the second guy, thought the first guy botchered the face shape...and "improved" it
 

Kosmo

Banned
The two faces look like different women though. I mean they're dressed and posed the same but the faces just don't line up. The original has more of an elongated oval shaped head.

Edit: By original I mean the one accepted as being da vinci's work shown on the right in the op.

Perhaps one painted when she was younger (left) and one when a little older (right).
 
i think there are supposed to be 12 years between the pictures

What's weird is that the hand position is exactly the same, also she's wearing the same dress, particularly the sleeves have the exact same folds in the fabric.

That makes me think it's just a copy or the birth of photoshop lol.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom