Sure, here: http://www.demrace.com/
I'm not sure how accurate it is in the way it distributes delegates, but it was fun to mess with.
Because they want Hillary to focus on attacking the Republicans. They want a show a "party unity" where Hillary ascends to the Iron Throne at the DNC and lays out a plan for vanquishing the Republicans--like they have a chance of winning the General anyway.
Sure, here: http://www.demrace.com/
I'm not sure how accurate it is in the way it distributes delegates, but it was fun to mess with.
in fairness, at that point it's moreso "a plan for maximizing margins for downballot races" than it is actually worrying about vanquishing Trump
Bernie can still win this, fight until the end
Hillary will goof a lot into the next month and beyond
Hit her hard, find a way to get those speeches
Rip Hillary apart, tear her up, destroy her soul
We'll see Bernie lose NY, NJ, ML and Penn, yes lol.
He has the midwest left, maybe west coast (but not Cali, and least not any huge margin).
It's pointless talking about him getting 20+ wins in NY ect and saying "we'll see" why not just say he's gonna with 30 points in Florida tomorrow while you're at it?
I didn't even see that bit, I realise now he's just joking around.
I can see Bernie taking NY
I can see Bernie taking NY
I can see Bernie taking NY
I can see Bernie taking NY
Was PPP the pollster that got in trouble for cooking their polls to appear more accurate than the competition?
There was an outfit in 2012 who used other polls to tweak their polls to appear more accurate and disregarded their own polling to make themselves look better; like, do five polls and only release the one that fell in line with other polling agencies. I thought it as PPP but I could be mistaken.It's a pretty known tendency for many polls to tighten near the end due to poller influence (by tweaking their likely-voter or vote-mix models). I don't think PPP is a special case at all.
It's wrong, but there's a lot questionable stuff in polling, not just a single undisciplined firm.
Not a chance at all. NY is Hillary country.
She was a popular senator here.
I think ny will look like mass. Hillary victory in city but Bernie winning less urban areas.
If Bernie had won mass i think he could have a shot in Ny. But he didn't..
Sure, here: http://www.demrace.com/
I'm not sure how accurate it is in the way it distributes delegates, but it was fun to mess with.
Mostly based on talk I've been hearing on other boards. Nothing scientific. And nothing you should be basing any assumption on.
I have heard some people saying Hawaii is kind of a stretch because it's Obama's home turf, and his connection with Hillary should help her there.
Damn, Hillary getting 60% of the vote in Florida compared to 61% of the vote is a difference of six delegates. Crazy.
I think ny will look like mass. Hillary victory in city but Bernie winning less urban areas.
If Bernie had won mass i think he could have a shot in Ny. But he didn't..
PPP was great in 2012. They mostly got shit from Republicans who were mad they were putting out polls showing Democrats ahead.
They did ok in 2014... Had a few misses but so did everyone. They've been good for the primaries so far, Michigan being their only huge miss.
PPP was right in 49 states in 2012 as I recall.
Right after that, though, Nate Cohn and Nate Silver ripped into them for what they considered to be unethical poll methodology -- basically modifying their weights on the fly to make sure that the polls were in line with the polling averages. There wasn't any specific evidence but there was a lot of argument.
So, I mean, you could kind of go either way.