• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Project Scorpio supports FreeSync and next-gen HDMI

giphy.gif
 
TV manufacturers can barely get their shit together for a software-based game mode and this will require additional hardware. I think we'll have to wait a while. Would like to be wrong.

Why additional hardware?

It's part of the HDMI 2.1 spec, when they release TVs with HDMI 2.1 inputs, it will be there
 
I figure it's a bit of a waste to connect Scorpio to a 1080p screen just for freesync when it means you're losing out on HDR and 4K resolution in the process.

I think waiting until the end of the year is the best bet.

Where it gets interesting is in 5 (or whatever) years time when the next iteration of Xbox hardware is out and presumably Scorpio becomes the lowest common denominator. Suddenly if it's struggling to keep a decent framerate on 2023's games, it won't matter quite as much because adaptive refresh displays will, hopefully, be widespread.
 
Are we really expecting this console to be >=$399? I'm curious as to how much more expensive features like this make a console.
We have a Scorpio price discussion thread for this purpose and yes. Still 100% expecting that $399.98 price point at E3.
 
It's pretty awesome when you think how this system is going to automatically upgrade whenever you decide to buy a new TV down the line, while having those of us still content with our 1080p sets covered as well. Even at $500, this system would be well worth it and then some.
Easy now, I still think $399 would be the perfect price, but I guess $449 could work too with clever marketing. Freesync is huge though, I think everybody who downplays this don't really know what it is. I thought it was a night and day difference when I got my gsync monitor.
Bonus, if the console could somehow automatically deactivate vsync when you connect it to a Freesync TV/monitor we could see another performance boost across the board too when HDMI2.1/Freesync is the norm.
Anyhow, I'm pretty much ready to preorder this now. MS is doing just about everything right with this box as it seems right now.
 
Are we really expecting this console to be >=$399? I'm curious as to how much more expensive features like this make a console.

Freesync is 100% royalty free and the latest HDMI spec is kind of a no brainer for a device launching in late 2017.

So I doubt this makes the console any more expensive.
 
I'm not even interested in Scorpio but this feels like the biggest bit of hopeful news for a future where any old TV from your local store supports Variable Refresh Rate.

the future I want to live in
 
Are we really expecting this console to be >=$399? I'm curious as to how much more expensive features like this make a console.

Isn't this just the latest version of HDMI? (I.e. 2.1). I don't see it adding much to the cost in all honesty.
 
In other words, "how dare you get excited over the next Xbox, even though it is going to kick the shit out of any console ever released."

The Microsoft hate is so 2013. Get over it, fellas.

This is a really cool feature for the future when TVs also start supporting new HDMI once the standard is complete and hopefully MS supporting it will push Sony to support it too via there own software update of the port, but the bolded is LOL.
 
I called this back during CES when the new HDMI standard was announced. I bet Scorpio on down the road will be able to support 8K video output as well, but ONLY for video. No up-scaling games, no need to jump the shark with that prediction.
 
360 had a tons of Xbox 1 games unsupported and many of those that were supported had bugs and slowdown. Can't even play Halo CE because it slows down to a uncomfortable level in every engagement. Especially silent cartographer, its unplayable

I was talking about 360 games on Xbone, but I see what you mean now.
 
I called this back during CES when the new HDMI standard was announced. I bet Scorpio on down the road will be able to support 8K video output as well, but ONLY for video. No up-scaling games, no need to jump the shark with that prediction.

No it won't, the HDMI 2.0 port supports 18 GB/s bandwidth, not 48 GB/s
 
I cannot stress this enough: all future consoles that do not have variable refresh rate support deserve to be clowned into oblivion.
 
Hmm putting in an advanced feature almost no 4kTV's will have for the foreseeable future. Hmmm this Scorpio thing could stick around for a long while.
 
I guess I'll get a second Freesync 4K monitor just to play console games on now. My PC monitor is GSYNC and only 1080p. Doesn't seem to be any with HDR though. Hopefully some will be out soon for not too extravagant prices.
ASUS have announced a 27" 4K 144Hz HDR G-Sync monitor for $1200.
I could see a FreeSync version for $1000 or so later this year.

There will surely be many more lower-cost options that only do 60Hz VRR, or have limited HDR support. (edge dimming/global dimming)
That ASUS monitor has a 384-zone local dimming system for really good HDR support, but that's expensive to implement.

Probably already been asked but
* is variable refresh rate a mandate in HDMI 2.1?
* Does that mean I should hold off buying a new TV?
It's unknown at this point whether VRR will be a requirement.
I hope it is, so that NVIDIA are forced to support it, unlike DisplayPort Adaptive-Sync.

I would wait if you don't need a new TV this year. VRR is a game-changer.

Oh wow G-Sync/Freesync is an amazing upgrade for the PC. How is it possible that this news hasn't leaked?? This is huge!
It was leaked a few days ago and the tweet promptly deleted.
 
I kinda just assumed most mid-high range TV's that are coming out in 2018 will have HDMI 2.1 no? So this seems like a very good call and maybe not as quite as 'unnecessary' as the article says.
 
Brilliant move from Microsoft.
I was really sad that Sony did not implement FreeSync in PS4 PRO.

HDMI 2.1 for Scorpio is awesome too. Scorpio becoming better and better.
 
A correction. Freesync is just AMD's brand name for their certification of Adaptive Sync displays (and certification for working with their implementation)

If TVs decide to adopt VRR next year which is still up in the air they will probably go with their own implementations of it and not bother to have AMD's certification. Ironically AMD made Freesync to try and prevent precisely this situation.


Adaptive sync is really hard especially with audio being brought into the mix. Also contrary to popular belief an HDMI user does not need to implement the whole of the spec,
and there is huge leeway on the manner some parts are implemented.


Hmmm... thanks for the clarification. I'll just hope for the best then.
 
We need this even if most of us won't buy a TV set for years. This should be standard down the road thanks to console manufacturers pushing and demanding more.
 
This is a really cool feature for the future when TVs also start supporting new HDMI once the standard is complete and hopefully MS supporting it will push Sony to support it too via there own software update of the port, but the bolded is LOL.

Come on, I obviously meant in terms of hardware and tech. Which does kick the shit out of any other console.
 
We need this even if most of us won't buy a TV set for years. This should be standard down the road thanks to console manufacturers pushing and demanding more.

Yeah, it is kind of neat to know that just buying a new TV down the road will also upgrade my system to a pretty significant degree.
 
imagec4906.png


How they gonna down play this one

Now I need to look for a new tv

New TVs don't even support HDMI 2.1 (not until well into next year) and there are currently no TVs out there that support FreeSync. So if you're buying a new TV, do it some time late in 2018 for the first batch to come out that MAY support FreeSync (it needs an extra feature on top of 2.1).

Essentially, you need to buy a PC monitor if you want something FreeSync right now. Also, FreeSync is built into basically all AMD GPUs now, so it's not surprising that it has FreeSync.
 
Top Bottom