I'll sue. God help me, I'll sue! http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=36267617&postcount=252
Don't worry, I await your OT.
I'll sue. God help me, I'll sue! http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=36267617&postcount=252
So is the trailer attached to the Hunger Games?
So is the trailer attached to the Hunger Games?
Wasn't for me.
I do think the 3D trailer will be attached to Titanic 3D, though. Sneaking suspicion.
Hunger Games worth seeing? My wife wants to go tonight. It's that or mini-golf.
Hunger Games worth seeing? My wife wants to go tonight. It's that or mini-golf.
It's really weird that they don't just call it Alien 5.
It's really weird that they don't just call it Alien 5.
Is this going to be a 2 part movie?
It's really weird that they don't just call it Alien 5.
Have you seen the trailers or actually heard about this movie beyond the title?
Great until no Alien appears that everyone is expecting and the bitching starts.
Yes.
It's an Alien movie without the Aliens.
It's the Space Jockey movie.
They have stated this numerous times.
Yes.
It's an Alien movie without the Aliens.
It's the Space Jockey movie.
They have stated this numerous times.
No, it's not, and Scott has said that over and over. Unless your perspective is so narrow that only an "Alien" movie can be set in the same fictional universe.
So is the trailer attached to the Hunger Games?
What part of my posts evoked that kind of pretentious response?
Takes place in the same universe as the Alien film but the universe is much bigger than what happend in that film. It's a standalone story that as Scott said "has strands of Alien DNA."
I fully expect us to see the Space Jockey race, as well as a proto-Chestburster, if not some proto-Facehuggers. Hell, we already saw the ship and quite possibly the Space Jockey in the trailer.
I fully expect us to see the Space Jockey race, as well as a proto-Chestburster, if not some proto-Facehuggers. Hell, we already saw the ship and quite possibly the Space Jockey in the trailer.
Let us assume you are right and that Scott and Lindelof have been outright lying the entire time.
It still takes place before Alien. Exactly how is calling it Alien 5 a good idea, again?
They could have called it Alien: Prometheus, or something. I don't know. Assess in seats.
.
I think they wanted to get away from the aliens v predator crowd stigma, as they were pretty bad films and did tarnish the aliens and predator name, imo
Would not surprise me.
They could have called it Alien: Prometheus, or something. I don't know. Assess in seats.
That's actually a really good point.
I think that is also why they haven't actually shown an xenomorph in the trailers.
you'll all want to shoot me in the face but I only now watched it in glorious 1080p, and jesus fuck is this thing gorgeous.
Also, it is utterly amazing that it has 4.6 million views in six days!
Go to mini-golf. Hunger Games is the type of film that asks you to leave your brain at the door. Maybe catch it when it comes to TV. Especially since that is where it looks to belong.
No, it's not, and Scott has said that over and over. Unless your perspective is so narrow that only an "Alien" movie can be set in the same fictional universe.
So basically, it's not Inception.
I think they may end up pissing a lot of people off by marketing it in an Alien-esque way when the movie really isn't an alien movie at all.
I assume you mean the echoes of the first film's trailer in the Prometheus ones. I suspect only avid fans of that film will be familiar with the homage to it. Otherwise, the marketing is quite different in tone.
One thing is for sure: I'm really sick of that blaring siren.
I assume you mean the echoes of the first film's trailer in the Prometheus ones. I suspect only avid fans of that film will be familiar with the homage to it. Otherwise, the marketing is quite different in tone.
One thing is for sure: I'm really sick of that blaring siren.
One thing is for sure: I'm really sick of that blaring siren.
I wouldn't say Inception asks you to leave your brain at the door. It is more akin to preparing your brain for a tantric massage and getting somebody who just lies on top of you for 2.5 hours, whispering in your ear - hinting at the things they might do to you if they were more talented.
Is there any topic on earth that you can't somehow tie in with a criticism of Christopher Nolan?
He prompted the Inception comparison with leaving your brain at the door, not me. I actually defended Inception, albeit in a somewhat backhanded way.
Is there any topic on earth that GAF can't somehow tie in with a criticism of Christopher Nolan?
I assume you mean the echoes of the first film's trailer in the Prometheus ones. I suspect only avid fans of that film will be familiar with the homage to it. Otherwise, the marketing is quite different in tone.
One thing is for sure: I'm really sick of that blaring siren.