• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

PS3 OFW 3.56 New Feature: Rootkit (allegedly)

Jus because Sony have installed this 'root kit' Jay makes you think the hackers can do it on any ps3? Maybe CFW ps3s but normal Ones? Bullshit. They'd have to access Sony's servers for that to even be possible.
 
MoonsaultSlayer said:
You wannabe hacker types are hilarious. All this fighting and e-peen stroking over running linux and roms on ANOTHER system "just because".... Hahaha.

Edit: oh yeah.. and the abiltity to boot up "back-ups" because the disc drive is too loud. Evil Sony for not allowing that feature from the get go.

Goddamn.

What's with the attitude of some people and the continual accusations of piracy? I don't understand it.
 
Tmac said:
From the description it isnt similar to the rootkit at all. The comparison just sounds like an attempt to make Sony looks a vilain because they are doing what they are suposed to do.

It doesn't matter even if it were a rootkit.

In the previous case, it was Sony trying to install a program into your Windows PC when you put a music cd into your computer's cd drive.

That is bad, because the only thing Sony had to do with the setup was the cd.

This time around Sony sold you the PS3. While it's true you own the PS3 hardware, they are just licensing the OS that runs it to you. Just like MS licenses you Windows.

And if you stay off PSN or don't buy any new games, you don't need to update your firmware or have any contact with Sony.

And same thing with Windows. Some programs/games will require updates from MS to work. DirectX most notably, but also sometimes a service pack.
 
ShockingAlberto said:
They want to blame someone and blaming Sony for anything disrupts their world view.

Sony is trying to defense them and all the third parties that are licensed in PS3 from the piracy. And is not only in his right, is his obligation because of the contracts that sign with the third parties to do anything legally possible to stop the piracy.

The executor of this measures is Sony, but the responsable are who leaked the codes online. Sony now is forced to do that kind of measures that I don't like, but I can understand.
 
richisawesome said:
Goddamn.

What's with the attitude of some people and the continual accusations of piracy? I don't understand it.

My attitude stems from knowing people into this type of stuff who use it for nothing more than playing illegally acquired games.

Not to mention the attitudes and nerd-flexing going on in this very thread over the ability to run another OS for the hell of it as if it's always the only reason they ever buy hardware... just to fucking tinker and apply shit it wasn't meant to do. (IE run NES roms, download ISOs cheat online whatever)
 
I'm learning a lot about gaming culture through reading this thread, and I've come to the conclusion that some people will accept any old horseshit as long as it has their favourite team logo stamped on it. Grown men arguing that other grown men shouldn't have the right to install software on a computer they bought. Good job.
 
Wolves Evolve said:
I'm learning a lot about gaming culture through reading this thread, and I've come to the conclusion that some people will accept any old horseshit as long as it has their favourite team logo stamped on it. Grown men arguing that other grown men shouldn't have the right to install software on a computer they bought. Good job.

Do what you want by yourself. A grown man crying that Sony can take away the potential to cheat is even more laughable if you ask me. I can care less if you wanted to make your PS3 a grill. But take it online with cheats enabled and I'll be that grown ass man crying admittedly. I play for fun and don't want that tampered with.
 
Wolves Evolve said:
I'm learning a lot about gaming culture through reading this thread, and I've come to the conclusion that some people will accept any old horseshit as long as it has their favourite team logo stamped on it. Grown men arguing that other grown men shouldn't have the right to install software on a computer they bought. Good job.

I'm able to do exactly what I expected to do with the PS3 and more. Try another angle, this anti consumer one isn't too persuasive. Why should I want CFWers on PSN? Sell it to me.
 
How come the same free program is still the best HTPC frontend out there? I tried several and always went back to the ps3 for watch vids, until i found xbmc pc.
 
gregor7777 said:
I posted it earlier, but I don't think they should "ban" anything. Just don't allow systems with CFW to connect. Allow that console to switch back to OFW and connect at will.

Can anyone see a problem with this?

I can still play my legally obtained games online, and still enjoy CFW when I want to without worry. Cheating is gone, hacks are gone, etc.
If that was allowed, what would stop a person from reverting back and forth, between OFW and CFW, to play legit games online and play pirated games offline?

Anyway, regardless of the legality of hacking one's own console, people should understand the ramifications of doing so, and that a permanent console ban is a realistic risk being taken.

Furthermore, what you're suggesting Sony should allow, makes no sense from Sony's standpoint. Someone who has already hacked his console once, would likely have the propensity to try it again, should a newly undetectable method be discovered. Better to get him the first time around, than to give him another chance to try again, later. If the hacker wants to give it another go, it'll at least cost him another console purchase. The idea is to make it as troublesome as possible for would-be hackers, to the point of making it not worthwhile for many people.
 
Ploid 3.0 said:
I'm able to do exactly what I expected to do with the PS3 and more. Try another angle, this anti consumer one isn't too persuasive. Why should I want CFWers on PSN? Sell it to me.

You can hear your teammates without the sound of the slogging disc-drive (actual comment from someone in one of the other threads. Something along the lines of not being able to hear someone yadda yadda).
 
MoonsaultSlayer said:
My attitude stems from knowing people into this type of stuff who use it for nothing more than playing illegally acquired games.

Not to mention the attitudes and nerd-flexing going on in this very thread over the ability to run another OS for the hell of it as if it's always the only reason they ever buy hardware... just to fucking tinker and apply shit it wasn't meant to do. (IE run NES roms, download ISOs cheat online whatever)

I can do whatever I want with the console that I brought with my hard earned £200. Who the hell are you to say otherwise? And being called out as a pirate is absolutely ridiculous, when all I want from my PS3 is region-free Blu Ray and being able to backup my games to my hard drive for convienience.

Anyway, people have been banned before for insinuating piracy without proof. Just saying.
 
MoonsaultSlayer said:
Do what you want by yourself. A grown man crying that Sony can take away the potential to cheat is even more laughable if you ask me. I can care less if you wanted to make your PS3 a grill. But take it online with cheats enabled and I'll be that grown ass man crying admittedly. I play for fun and don't want that tampered with.
Oh my lord, im dying here. Awesome reply.

Both camps have their "republican bat shit" ppl so pretending like ego-maniacs who want linux on their toaster dont exist is laughable too.
 
MoonsaultSlayer said:
You can hear your teammates without the sound of the slogging disc-drive (actual comment from someone in one of the other threads. Something along the lines of not being able to hear someone yadda yadda).

I've made it a point to avoid commenting in the CFW thread(s), but I have a itching question which has been bothering since the inception of gaia(?) and Multiman for the PS3 (CFW).

Ok, is the back-up method exactly like the X360 install? where you install the game but the exact same game disc is required to boot? or do you install the game and can boot via any disc?
 
richisawesome said:
I can do whatever I want with the console that I brought with my hard earned £200. Who the hell are you to say otherwise? And being called out as a pirate is absolutely ridiculous, when all I want from my PS3 is region-free Blu Ray and being able to backup my games to my hard drive for convienience.

That's awesome. But you're not everyone.

If I have to chance encountering cheaters then you're going to have to chance people like me being a dick to you. I'm not everyone from my stance either.
 
BrLvgThrChmstry said:
I've made it a point to avoid commenting in the CFW thread(s), but I have a itching question which has been bothering since the inception of gaia(?) and Multiman for the PS3 (CFW).

Ok, is the back-up method exactly like the X360 install? where you install the game but the exact same game disc is required to boot? or do you install the game and can boot via any disc?
Im sure you can have any disk at minimum and some loaders dont need a disk at all.
 
Ploid 3.0 said:
I'm able to do exactly what I expected to do with the PS3 and more. Try another angle, this anti consumer one isn't too persuasive. Why should I want CFWers on PSN? Sell it to me.

I'm not sure what you are trying here. We know that there is no way to "sell" you CFW.

BrLvgThrChmstry said:
I've made it a point to avoid commenting in the CFW thread(s), but I have a itching question which has been bothering since the inception of gaia(?) and Multiman for the PS3 (CFW).

Ok, is the back-up method exactly like the X360 install? where you install the game but the exact same game disc is required to boot? or do you install the game and can boot via any disc?

Any disc.
 
Wolves Evolve said:
I'm learning a lot about gaming culture through reading this thread, and I've come to the conclusion that some people will accept any old horseshit as long as it has their favourite team logo stamped on it. Grown men arguing that other grown men shouldn't have the right to install software on a computer they bought. Good job.


A console isnt a PC. Its a freaking CLOSED system you can't install whatever you want.
 
Cruzader said:
Im sure you can have any disk at minimum and some loaders dont need a disk at all.

kamorra said:
Any disc.

Hm. Ugh... no comment! -- I'll just say it's news like this that dictates my stance on 'OFW'/Homebrew movement (Generally Positive, somewhat negative). I understand nor do I care that people use it and I'm sure there are legit users -- but I'm also not naive enough to believe no one is using (abusing) particular features to take advantage of the situation (I want to avoid the use of the word 'Pirate').

But whatever, I'm "For" legit use -- "Against" illegal(?) use, but if both are in violation of ToS ...Then well, you can't have your cake and eat it too(?)
 
Tmac said:
A console isnt a PC. Its a freaking CLOSED system you can't install whatever you want.

Looks pretty opened to me, what with those two USB ports sticking out and an Ethernet cable in the back.... :p
 
Tmac said:
A console isnt a PC. Its a freaking CLOSED system you can't install whatever you want.

It's not a closed system. I am not leasing the hardware from Sony. I legally purchased the hardware. What I do with it after this is none of their concern.

Now I can see the angle of keeping people off of PSN. This is fine as it is their "CLOSED" online domain. Even so, I still own the hardware. So if I want to use it for something that Sony didn't intend it doesn't matter, as it is my legal property.
 
Godslay said:
It's not a closed system. I am not leasing the hardware from Sony. I legally purchased the hardware. What I do with it after this is none of their concern.

Now I can see the angle of keeping people off of PSN. This is fine as it is their "CLOSED" online domain. Even so, I still own the hardware. So if I want to use it for something that Sony didn't intend it doesn't matter, as it is my legal property.

Do you control the software?
 
Alucrid said:
Do you control the software?

If I had access to it, then sure - and right now I do, thanks to the hackers, waiting upon some kick-ass multimedia apps. As a really bad analogy - if I took MS Paint and hacked it to draw trollfaces instead of circles, who would give a shit? I'm personally keeping that software modification to myself, and it's not affecting anyone else.
 
2ppddur.jpg

(from the Apocalyps3 thread, but seemed appropriate here too.)
 
richisawesome said:
I can do whatever I want with the console that I brought with my hard earned £200. Who the hell are you to say otherwise? And being called out as a pirate is absolutely ridiculous, when all I want from my PS3 is region-free Blu Ray and being able to backup my games to my hard drive for convienience.

Anyway, people have been banned before for insinuating piracy without proof. Just saying.

One of the things I see a couple of the homebrew people do is use the ban for mentioning piracy as a weapon. Someone mentions or hints at piracy in whatever context, then somebody picks up that paint, splash them self with it and asks "did you put this paint on me? This is bannable!" Don't mention the negatives of homebrew.

kamorra said:
I'm not sure what you are trying here. We know that there is no way to "sell" you CFW.

Sell me the idea that CFW on PSN is A-OK, safe, no problem, cool, etc. Why I shouldn't be concerned by it.
 
Ploid 3.0 said:
Sell me the idea that CFW on PSN is A-OK, safe, no problem, cool, etc. Why I shouldn't be concerned by it.

There is no reason for me to do that. As I already said, there is no way to sell you CFW. You will always find something to not like.
 
Or you can see why people would not like CFW to have access to PSN. Let's stop running around the bush.

I understand that people that only use CFW for good still want to access their PSN downloads, maybe even play new games online, but they have to understand that they can't really have them both. CFW is a threat and sony will fight it. Normal PS3 users don't need more ways for other players to grieve them, and game devs would like if sony limit the ability for PS3's to be able to back up and play games on the console.

If you're really into CFW and Homebrew it should be worth it enough to not have access to PSN. There is supposedly an amazing amount of Homebrew things to keep the enthusiasts happy.
 
Ploid 3.0 said:
Or you can see why people would not like CFW to have access to PSN. Let's stop running around the bush.

I don't have a problem to see that. You don't have to be all snarky.
 
Tmac said:
A console isnt a PC. Its a freaking CLOSED system you can't install whatever you want.

So was an iPhone and it was "illegal" at the time. Turns out, upon further examination, consumers actually won out and such stupid shit was granted the legal pass. Just because there is some retarded law like the DMCA created saying all this stuff is "illegal", doesn't mean the law ITSELF isn't wrong and illegal. It just hasn't been challenged yet. Again, it WAS illegal to jailbreak an iPhone.

How are the similarities so missed by people? They're both closed systems, which involve fw being broken so a consumer can do as they wish with the device.
 
squatingyeti said:
How are the similarities so missed by people? They're both closed systems, which involve fw being broken so a consumer can do as they wish with the device.

In one case an exception was made to break a monopoly situation, which governments usually don't like very much. In the other case, not so much. It's not comparable at all.
 
squatingyeti said:
How are the similarities so missed by people? They're both closed systems, which involve fw being broken so a consumer can do as they wish with the device.
I don't know if its that point being missed so much as wanting to keep hacked consoles off of PSN, where they could then adversely affect people who bought their PS3s for its intended purposes.
 
Hopefully sony just bans anyone that hacks in the multiplayer games on the system, that's what really pisses me off. Its so ridiculous that people do stuff like that. How is it even fun?
 
squatingyeti said:
So was an iPhone and it was "illegal" at the time. Turns out, upon further examination, consumers actually won out and such stupid shit was granted the legal pass. Just because there is some retarded law like the DMCA created saying all this stuff is "illegal", doesn't mean the law ITSELF isn't wrong and illegal. It just hasn't been challenged yet. Again, it WAS illegal to jailbreak an iPhone.

How are the similarities so missed by people? They're both closed systems, which involve fw being broken so a consumer can do as they wish with the device.

Wtf, noone is saying its illegal to modify your piece of hardware.

Consoles have a CLOSED business model, if you, at some point, was able to bypass security, good for you. You cant simples expect that as a console feature. Sony have the right to re-stabilish the previous status quo because a console is a closed plattaform, you can't compare it with a PC.
 
ShockingAlberto said:
They want to blame someone and blaming Sony for anything disrupts their world view.

you could've...you could've at least sugarcoated it a bit, man.
10 pages in, clowns are still gleefully calling for bans on even offline shit.
 
Raist said:
In one case an exception was made to break a monopoly situation, which governments usually don't like very much. In the other case, not so much. It's not comparable at all.

No, you might want to check out the ruling then - very comparable IMHO. The ruling quotes Sega Enters. Ltd. v. Accolade, Inc, very interesting reading also!
 
Tmac said:
A console isnt a PC. Its a freaking CLOSED system you can't install whatever you want.

Who gets to decide what a 'CLOSED' system is? What if Microsoft made a deal with Dell/HP to use a key system to allow only Windows to be installed, and what if Windows blocked out certain software? Would this be a 'CLOSED' system? Are they allowed to do that?

Edit: why does Sony think they have the right to block me from my Netflix?
 
Raist said:
In one case an exception was made to break a monopoly situation, which governments usually don't like very much. In the other case, not so much. It's not comparable at all.

You're wrong. One of the exceptions had to do with providers (the AT&T monopoly), the other exception is exactly like game consoles, only it does specifically state mobile phones. This may be a case that pushes for another exception (in 2012).
 
ivedoneyourmom said:
Who gets to decide what a 'CLOSED' system is? What if Microsoft made a deal with Dell/HP to use a key system to allow only Windows to be installed, and what if Windows blocked out certain software? Would this be a 'CLOSED' system? Are they allowed to do that?

Edit: why does Sony think they have the right to block me from my Netflix?

Because they think they have super powers. That sony. Might as well get a PC to show sony where the money/votes are at (Don't get a sony PC).
 
Ploid 3.0 said:
I'm able to do exactly what I expected to do with the PS3 and more. Try another angle, this anti consumer one isn't too persuasive. Why should I want CFWers on PSN? Sell it to me.

MW2 is so awesome with them....
 
Top Bottom