OfWhiteSkinOnRedLeather
Member
They'll take control away from retailers and be able to set realistic prices.
That's very naive of you.
They'll take control away from retailers and be able to set realistic prices.
After feeling like the sky was falling on this industry i feel more optimistic now myself. I don't think Cerny had taken the ps4 this far to let it get hung up in such stupid shit.
Maybe I'm just going through the stages of grief. :/
Whatever the outcome of this campaign, I really hope all of you keep this attitude alive, not caving in like that infamous MW2 Steam boycott group. This is an awesome campaign, but there is a good chance Sony has an agreement with publishers they can't or simply don't want to back out of.
Sony has been pushing hard for the ban of used game sales in the past, especially in Japan. They are publishers themselves after all. Between 1999 and 2002 it was illegal to sell used games in Japanese retail shops.(Here - Maybe some Japanese Gaffers can corroborate?). Sony fought tooth and nail, joining Japan's biggest publishers in a lawsuit against a big retailer called ACT to keep it that way. Same old argument, every sold used game equates to a lost sale of a new copy. Ironically it was this lawsuit that led to the lift of said ban by Japan's high court(Here).
Furthermore, Sony had patents in place to block used games way before the PS3 came out (Here).
Microsoft probably wasn't even dreaming about blocking used games back then, since they couldn't afford losing Gamestop as a retail partner to establish the US 360 user base they can build on today. Sony couldn't risk it either with the 360 as a real threat to the PS3. Gamestop could have easily used that situation to play them out against each other, stocking the 360 but not the PS3, had Sony dared to unilaterally go ahead and cut GS out of their most lucrative business.
But now the global user base for both platforms sit at a comfortable and equally high level. Brands are established and with Microsoft's used games strategy on the horizon, no used games on PC, why would Sony all of a sudden have a change of heart about something they basically hated and thought about abolishing for the past 15 years?
I doubt Sony and Microsoft share the same passionate hate for each other as some gamers might expect them to, compelling both companies not to work together on this issue, shoving the inconvenient truth, that you never owned a game contained on a physical disc to begin with, down their consumer's throat. You only acquire a license for the bits and bytes on your disc, hence the first sale doctrine legally doesn't even apply anymore (Here).
People need to be educated. It's the ignorance of the masses Sony, Microsoft and all other content providers count on, heading full steam (no pun intended) ahead into the next generation and a digital only era with all its power shifting restrictions. We need to argue about ridiculous ToS agreements, that take all rights away from consumers, even going so far to forbid you to join a class action lawsuit (Here & Here).
This is so much bigger than just used games. Imagine you get banned on Xbox Live. Hundreds if not thousands of dollars ($60 games + dlc and subs included on the X1) in (perceived) value are gone just like that as soon as your system breathes its last breathe. And you know it will happen sooner than later, with the 360's built quality and comments from Yusuf Mehdi expecting to sell 25 million more 360s, half of them coming from replacements (Here). Even if you get banned for all the right reasons. Does that justify the termination of your entire gaming library? Or shouldn't losing access to the service and hours spent achievement hunting be enough punishment? Not to mention the lack of preservation of games, should XBL, Steam, iTunes and other services like that ever shut down.
Of cause all of you probably know that already, but I think it's worth to take a step back and remind ourselves to look at the bigger picture. Should this campaign fail, the time will come, when we'll have to vote with our wallets denying ourselves all those sweet exclusives by taking a stand.
Lets hope we'll leave our mark in gaming history, after all, hope dies last.
Keep up the great work Neogaf!
When PS4 sells 20:1 vs Xbone publishers will not sit idle and pass up that user base. If they do, they die, and new publishers and developers pop up to take their place, just like any other business.
And like I mentioned below Sony shared those interests with third parties long before MS ever did.
The problem is Third Party sales drive console purchases unless you're Nintendo. If stuff like CoD, Battlefield, Madden, and Assassin's Creed aren't available to Sony, that's gonna be an uphill battle for them.
BTW, what do we know of the DRM plan Sony was considering? Is it all that bad?
So far we know from famousmortimer that it has something to do with RFID.
OK. Just came back here and i still don't understand this hate wave. Did SONY announce bad news? Or MS? What made all of you change your mind?
I'm still optimistic. The twitter campaign was a success with SONY (I didn't even cared for MS, they were a lost cause) Remember @yosp joking about a bit? Remember the feedback and coverage we got?
Come on, guys, remain positive!
BELIEVE
I think there could be the hype at the start, but what about the people who get a One and a few games, play them once or twice then realise that they can't just sell the games to a mate for $20? IMO that's when you'll start seeing reports on the Today show and various mainstream media outlets about how anti-consumer it all is.But I think the hard question we have to ask ourselves is: do we matter to them? That is to say; does winning brownie points in the short-term for not having restrictive DRM really benefit them? I'd like to think that a lot of gamers who were considering the Nextbox have switched over; but when they launch how can we be sure we won't be swept up in the hype as we always have been. I think the abject failure of the Wii U though is a bit encouraging, no offense to Nintendo fans, but at the same time MS has the capital to launch a media blitz to shove the Xbone down casuals throats. I can hope that they won't give a fuck, and tbh good money would say they'd just see the Xbone as the new Zune to Apple's Apple TV. You just can't be sure about these things. I know damn well there's nothing MS could do to win me over; and I hope Sony recognizes how much this matters to us. We probably are going digital only eventually, but we don't want to be anally penetrated by it and told we should consider it a privilege.
I still don't know:
- If an xbone game can be installed and/or verified when not connected to the internet
Do not see Microsofts announcement as failure. People succeeded in making ether voices heard around the world, in multiformat news that otherwise would have ignored us. Widening the net got responses that helped carry the message further than it would have gone.
I think it bears mentioning that it is our job to be heard, but it was their failure in not listening.
So, 50% of the plan is failed.
Now is the Sony turn...
Do not see Microsofts announcement as failure. People succeeded in making ether voices heard around the world, in multiformat news that otherwise would have ignored us. Widening the net got responses that helped carry the message further than it would have gone.
I think it bears mentioning that it is our job to be heard, but it was their failure in not listening.
Do not see Microsofts announcement as failure. People succeeded in making ether voices heard around the world, in multiformat news that otherwise would have ignored us. Widening the net got responses that helped carry the message further than it would have gone.
I think it bears mentioning that it is our job to be heard, but it was their failure in not listening.
Seriously, I can barely feel any joy for the upcoming E3 right now. All I want to know is Sony's move on this. Games aside. All I want is clarification now.
I'm completely with you. But doesn't seem to be the reality we live in anymore. :/ It really seems like the best we can hope for is that Sony doesn't implement system level DRM and just leaves it up to publishers. Obviously it'd be great if they told publishers that they aren't allowed to block games, but that seems highly unlikely.
h5
link[360 owners] If you're unhappy with the XBox 1, Call Microsoft and remove auto-renewal and all credit cards. Let them know DRM is the reason why you're leaving.
Do not see Microsofts announcement as failure. People succeeded in making ether voices heard around the world, in multiformat news that otherwise would have ignored us. Widening the net got responses that helped carry the message further than it would have gone.
I think it bears mentioning that it is our job to be heard, but it was their failure in not listening.
He's been saying the same thing for a week now.I believe he's been talking about the NSA (?) thing most of today so it's nothing to do with this.
I'm going to do this right now.
I'm going to do this right now.
I honestly feel that Microsoft's policies were looking even worse before this whole movement started. Especially the part about being able to give away a game once to a minimum 30-day friend, that sounds like they pulled it out of their ass at the last minute to appease the reaction.
I'm okay if they purely leave it up to publishers. No system level nonsense. Put it entirely in the hands of the publishers and leave everything up to them. Much like with online passes. If that's what happens them i'm cool. I simply won't buy games from those publishers.
Got to agree, when it's not at system level, you can hold the specific publishers accountable for the DRM, and they can't hide behind the console policy. All you do then, is not buy any games from those publishers.
I'm hoping if they do that then we may see very few utilize it, PS3 is region free but devs can region lock, only Atlus did that with P4A and the hate they got for it made them promise they wouldn't do it again.
And remember thats only something you'll be able to do for sure with 1st party Xbone games. For 3rd parties, it's something the publishers can "enable" for their games.
Capcom also used always-on DRM for a couple of titles. Final Fight double impact and (i think?) Bionic Commando Rearmed.
They got so much negative feedback they never tried it for higher profile titles, and no other developer bothered even though the capability was built into the PS3 from day 1.
I'm one of those people who asked for refund once I found out about it. Have incomplete trophy from that game because of it but fuck Crapcom if they think they can make me buy a game with DRM ever again.
This is amazing I never heard of this. Can someone point me to a link about this stuff. To the best of my knowledge all PS3 games were region free.