CatLady
Selfishly plays on Xbox Purr-ies X
Hold up a minute. It needs a stand to lay flat?
I'm not fond of the XsX in the horizontal position, but OMG the PS5 looks completely retarded when horizontal. It's hideous.
Hold up a minute. It needs a stand to lay flat?
It's SONY's best interest to get the PS5's in public to take it off the hot seat, if they're sticking with this shy guy stuff it's just criminal to their fanbase.
The stand it mandatory because the system cannot stand on its own (Upwards or on its sides). A size comparison would require the stand in this case.That's because I've used the image from before and set each one base on their actual dimensions
You can do this yourself and you'll get the same results
And as you can see my results are almost identical to the Eurogamer one from a few months ago
I'm not sure what went on in the original image but it's most definitely isn't accurate
Hey I thought you wanted a straight from bottom to top comparison.
The size doesn't include the stand and would make the PS5 smaller if I included it
The stand it mandatory because the system cannot stand on its own (Upwards or on its sides). A size comparison would require the stand in this case.
Is that confirmed? You need the stand?The stand it mandatory because the system cannot stand on its own (Upwards or on its sides). A size comparison would require the stand in this case.
No, they have not yet and I didn't see people asking them. Have you seen the renders by Sony? why would they use a stand to set it on its side (especially on its side) or vertical if it does not need it. Vertically, it would not have enough balance to stay stable.Is that confirmed? You need the stand?
Please see my reply to ethmoz.This dude has one in their house and can verify these claims.![]()
PS2 pics were always showed with the stand but it never required it.No, they have not yet and I didn't see people asking them. Have you seen the renders by Sony? why would they use a stand to set it on its side (especially on its side) or vertical if it does not need it. Vertically, it would not have enough balance to stay stable.
whit that, the volumetric foot print is what should be compared.
No, they have not yet and I didn't see people asking them. Have you seen the renders by Sony? why would they use a stand to set it on its side (especially on its side) or vertical if it does not need it. Vertically, it would not have enough balance to stay stable.
whit that, the volumetric foot print is what should be compared.
Please see my reply to ethmoz.
No, they have not yet and I didn't see people asking them. Have you seen the renders by Sony? why would they use a stand to set it on its side (especially on its side) or vertical if it does not need it. Vertically, it would not have enough balance to stay stable.
whit that, the volumetric foot print is what should be compared.
I like a lot as well. I just wish they had been a bit more sensitive to the current climate and didn't go with a colour scheme that focuses on black being surrounded by white. It's basically white supremacy and white privilege in a plastic form.I'm sorry but the discless version looks awesome. Best looking console design ever.
PS2 pics were always showed with the stand but it never required it.
We will see... I have no issue with the stand I even prefer to have it included in the package but there is no confirmation yet if it is required or not.
Nah, I don't see anyone with a legitimate interest in the system being so hung up over it. As per usual its salty platform warriors trying to make it a thing.
People have been complaining about the size of the PS5 since the reveal so has anybody tried to measure its exact dimension from pics?
This picture can't be accurate... if that's the X1 then it should be slightly taller than the PS3, if it's the X1S it should be significantly shorter, and in this pic it's slightly shorter which neither are.PS5 is 14 inches, 2 inches bigger then a PS3
Well 1.2 inches taller
A PS4 Pro is 11.6 inches
Xbox One 13.1 inches (closest to PS5)
Series X is 11.8 inches
So
![]()
This is wrong, XSX is bigger then a PS4 Pro
Your assumption that no one is familiar with moments and center of gravity is absurd. Also, we are comparing the official display images from Sony here, not what products or accessories ps2 had. As I explained to ethnic, the ps2 had a smaller ratio between its height and width and looks much shorter than ps5. This means it had no issues standing vertically with a stand. I used to do it all the time.
I have a lunch ps2 with both a vertical and horizontal stand. They are to ensure stability. They arent necessary. The issue is with the language some people, you included, use. Speaking on matters you dont have firsthand experience with as if you have the facts. Speculate all you want. Here's an example of how to do that:
"It probably uses a stand because it might tip over without one."
See the difference?
Like I said earlier, when measuring the console it wouldn't include the stand and including it and keeping to the assumed measurement would actually make the system smallerThe stand it mandatory because the system cannot stand on its own (Upwards or on its sides). A size comparison would require the stand in this case.
vertical is what finally killed my PS3, heat eventually caused the cold solder to fail and now i'm stuck with a beeping brick instead of a console.Yeah I've never had an interest in having consoles vertically since I want them in the shelves and behind doors when not in use. But if I had no choice I'd definitely want a stand for stability. Even with no kids our big dog slams into things running around playing sometimes, the robot vacuum hits the tv stand pretty hard, I'm pretty clumsy myself etc.
You should include the stand.. it is effectively a part of the console... a measure without it is useless as you need to include it to figure out space requirements.Like I said earlier, when measuring the console it wouldn't include the stand and including it and keeping to the assumed measurement would actually make the system smaller
Your math is absolutely dismal. I mean so off it's not even laughable, I'm just confused how you could possibly come to that figure of the PS5 being 6,000 cm3.XSX is bigger from what I can see.
It is less than 6000cm3 vs 6750cm2.
What crazy math and FUD.
XSX = 30 x 15 x 15 cm = 6750mm3
PS5 = 40 x 20-25 x 6 = 6000mm3 max using the 25.
Volume size Xbox is bigger.
It is no even close to the largest console create... it is closer to PS4 Pro size than XSX.
PS3: 27.4 x 32.5 x 9.8 cm = 8726 cm3
XB: 26 x 32 x 10 cm = 8320 cm3
XB1: 27.4 x 33.3 x 7.9 cm = 7208 cm3
XSX 15 x 15 x 30 cm = 6750 cm3
PS5 < 6000 cm3
PS4 P: 29.5 x 32.7 x 5.5 cm = 5305 cm3
PS4: 27.5 x 30.5 x 5.3 cm = 4445 cm3
XB1 S: 23 x 29.5 x 6.4 cm = 4342 cm3
XB1 X: 24 x 30 x 6 cm = 4320 cm3
PS4 S: 26.5 x 28.8 x 3.9 cm = 2976 cm3
SW: 10.2 x 23.9 x 1.39 cm = 338 cm3
You should include the stand.. it is effectively a part of the console... a measure without it is useless as you need to include it to figure out space requirements.
Reality.Your math is absolutely dismal. I mean so off it's not even laughable, I'm just confused how you could possibly come to that figure of the PS5 being 6,000 cm3.
The PS5 is roughly 15" tall, 3.3" wide and 10" deep. In Centimeters that is 38.1 x 8.38 x 25.4 which equals out to 8,111 cm3.
The Series X is 6,750 as you noted which is DRASTICALLY smaller than the PlayStation 5.
Your math is bunk.
I don't find this argument valid because the whole Point of this comparison is to figure out how much space it would take after you buy it. If the stand is mandatory, then it effects its actual footprint. based on Sony renders, they are using stands for horizontal and vertica positions.Like I said earlier, when measuring the console it wouldn't include the stand and including it and keeping to the assumed measurement would actually make the system smaller
This size damage control from these guys is getting sad, the system is in the very high 7000's to low 8000's.I'll jump in and go with:
37.5 x 23 x 9.5 = 8193.75 cm3
Not in the pics showed.This size damage control from these guys is getting sad, the system is in the very high 7000's to low 8000's.
This size damage control from these guys is getting sad, the system is in the very high 7000's to low 8000's.
It doesn't matter, it's a spatial obstruction so it might as well be a filled void given the space required to house it must account for those overhangs.Do remember that these measurements include overhanging plastic that doesn't add to the internal volume. XSX doesn't waste a millimetre here.
Your assumption that no one is familiar with moments and center of gravity is absurd. Also, we are comparing the official display images from Sony here, not what products or accessories ps2 had. As I explained to ethnic, the ps2 had a smaller ratio between its height and width and looks much shorter than ps5. This means it had no issues standing vertically with a stand. I used to do it all the time.
the ps5 however is much taller console without having much width. That means it would be too risky to place it that way without the stand. If you want to put it in the future vertically without the stand just to "own" me, be my guest. But you have to wonder why they still showed the horizontal position with a stand as well and this is bizarre to me, It could be that only the disc version requires it in that position. Or due to ventilations, it would still need it to in digital edition.
also, would you show me pictures of the horizontal stand Of ps2 because I don't think I had ever seen.
now after I had explained myself, let me look at the language you have been using. You have expressed several times that you don't care whether it is big or small but you still show discomfort when you see people try to make the comparison. Your exaggeration that people are making an argument that bigger ps5=no one will buy it is a sign of lack of confidence in the product. No one is saying that. You should be happy because all these complaints means that these people are actually planning to buy ps5; they are just having to consider how to store it.
All of your assumptions are absurd. More so because you treat them as fact. I said I didn't care how big it was. I don't. I take issue with bad actors saying they do care. I don't believe those people genuinely care or genuinely want a ps5.
It doesn't matter, it's a spatial obstruction so it might as well be a filled void given the space required to house it must account for those overhangs.
If it is mandatory I hope it come with all consoles sold.If the stand were mandatory it means it would be in the box with the console, right?
PS4 stand was sold separately
it seems that way. if they beat or even match Sony on price it could be disastrous for Sony. I suspect that if this size is real it is because Sony needed to include a massive heat sink after desperately overclocking the GPU. (Note that I don't care about fanboy wars, to me they are uninteresting and nonsensical. I just buy whatever interests me.)
please specify which one of my claims are absurd. your empty dismissal is not going to cut it. if you are this insecure because people are saying that ps5 might be bigger than xsx or that it might fall if you put it without stand is like "attacking ps5" then you need help man!
What I mean is we have to assume that 14" is without the stand so including it because the image displays it would make the actual machine smaller unless we guess the stand is another inch so 15"?I don't find this argument valid because the whole Point of this comparison is to figure out how much space it would take after you buy it. If the stand is mandatory, then it effects its actual footprint. based on Sony renders, they are using stands for horizontal and vertica positions.
Some people have wifes and eyes.
It that space smaller than 38cm?It won't fit on my TV Stand
![]()