ethomaz
Banned
Interesting but it can means anything depending the games used in the compilation.First leaks of RX Vega Air gaming benches (295W TDP):
![]()
https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/6tfzdm/vega_leaked_benchmarks_performance_seems_ok/
Interesting but it can means anything depending the games used in the compilation.First leaks of RX Vega Air gaming benches (295W TDP):
![]()
https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/6tfzdm/vega_leaked_benchmarks_performance_seems_ok/
About this graph, I don't know the true performance for the Vega cards yet but I know that the GTX 1080Ti FE can't improve 23% from OC.
If this is accurate then the Vega 56 looks pretty damn impressive.
Anyone know what 8/14 means in terms of time? Should we expect to see stuff go up at midnight? Any idea on which time zone that might be?
9am EST
Est maybe? Regardless, we'll find out soon.Anyone know what 8/14 means in terms of time? Should we expect to see stuff go up at midnight? Any idea on which time zone that might be?
Except these are huge die chips competing with NV mid sized dies. NV is killing amd on margins. That's why nvs shareholders are pretty happy and amds aren't. You can't really spin this as any sort of win for amd.
From said review:
The liquid can get close to the 1080ti in some games, at least. And the air's not far behind. Key is where the 56 falls, mostly.
The writer of the review said the wattage chart is GPU only. System power draw is not included. 500+ watts max draw with the liquid cooled 64 running flat out is crazy.
To say that violates the PCI-e specifications would be putting it lightly.
To say that violates the PCI-e specifications would be putting it lightly.
Unsurprisingly, the 64 WC has a tough time defending its $699 price tag, however the $499 AC looks to be a good buy.
It's $699?!??!?!
Across all games in that review, the Air more or less seems to match a non-overclocked 1080 FE. While apparently consuming 327W in-game on just the GPU.
If you run a 1080 at ~275W it's about 15% faster than a stock FE.
Sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo, when's Volta coming out?
I'm shocked at that power consumption. Was expecting much better from that small of a lithography. Dammit AMD...
$599 air cooled from newegg
![]()
About this graph, I don't know the true performance for the Vega cards yet but I know that the GTX 1080Ti FE can't improve 23% from OC.
Disgusting. $100 mark up. I guess I'll hold out for the 56 in two weeks.
Iirc the 8 pin is rated to 150w max. Which means there is approximately a power draw of 200 watts from the pci-e slot which is a bit crazy if not impossible.
We know they are working on RX 56 review, not 64, thanks to their earlier tweet.
Link doesn't work for me for some reason.
The Graph shows 12.89% from OC.
Link doesn't work for me for some reason.
It makes sense to wait for AIBs anyhow (bar, perhaps, liquid cooled version)
56 is expected in Sept.
AMD shut it down
It's crazy to expect the 56 won't be similarly marked up on AIB boards. Miners will snap these up in that price range without hesitation.
https://twitter.com/ryanshrout/status/896821929654571008Nothing has changed from Vega FE.
If the 64 really draws more than 500W I'm not going to bother and buy a 1080ti instead. Bought a new power supply (750W) for the Fury X back then but I won't do that again.
How long until the embargo ends?
If the 64 really draws more than 500W I'm not going to bother and buy a 1080ti instead. Bought a new power supply (750W) for the Fury X back then but I won't do that again.
How long until the embargo ends?
If the 64 really draws more than 500W I'm not going to bother and buy a 1080ti instead
$599 air cooled from newegg
![]()