But they can just teach math in college once u have a major that involves advanced math??
There's a lot of use for series in mathematical probability and statistics.
wrongI don't think somebody who uses an "and" to start a sentence should be complaining about anything teachers say because they clearly didn't pay attention during school.
Names and dates are the most useless parts of history though. Actually learning about history, the how and the why, that's incredibly important for a working adult.
Calculus has gone mostly unused by me, but I use algebra and statistics often.
Matrices are standard in the USA as part of Algebra II.
And write in cursive and shit? Any time I have to do a math problem I can just flip up the calculator on my Apple iPhone 6
and I dare u to try and write something in cursive
It would've made school way more fun if teachers would have been real about what stuff was good to know. Like hb having a class about filing taxes or shopping for credit cards
The most memorable event when I was taking Ancient and Medieval History was when we did the Roman Empire and my teacher showed the graffiti written on the bathroom walls.
If you didn't know the origin, you would have thought it was stuff found today. It humanized the period and made the class realize that no matter the time period, people still had behaviors we can relate to today.
I think it would help if schools taught math better. They have so much to teach in such a short time. Kids lose interest fast and burnout. I think teachers burnout somewhat as well.
I write in cursive. :V
I think it would help if schools taught math better. They have so much to teach in such a short time. Kids lose interest fast and burnout. I think teachers burnout somewhat as well.
While technology has rapidly advanced people haven't changed all that much in the last few thousand years. But that's the sort of thing that's hard to see without a proper history education.If you didn't know the origin, you would have thought it was stuff found today. It humanized the period and made the class realize that no matter the time period, people still had behaviors we can relate to today.
I wish we spent more time focusing on the logical reasoning and problem solving that's in college level math. The power of math in explaining almost everything we can see in the universe is one of the greatest human accomplishments, and something that everyone should be a part of.I study Physics in college and I'm just in love with math, feel bad for you op...
Sure, with history, you can discover new things about history by knowing other things about history. But at its apex, knowing history can be conquered by just rote memorization and regurgitation of facts (I guess high level history learning however does include a lot of good judgment based on established facts, just like math, though). People who are good at absorbing facts can be very good historians. But what about creativity? Knowledge synthesis? History doesn't seem to expand these learning processes. It seems to be a more shallow subject of learning depth despite how vast and broad it is.
Wow the misconception about what legit history is astounds me, but is unfortunately not too surprising.
History is not about rote memorization or knowing random facts.
Math is incredibly important, also no disputing that.
But they can just teach math in college once u have a major that involves advanced math??
Math is important for people who want to go to college, study STEM and have ambitions.
You actually don't need to be that incredibly gifted at math for most STEM fields.
You actually don't need to be that incredibly gifted at math for most STEM fields.
History at a high level isn't just memorizing facts; that's like saying that math is just memorizing your times tables or the quadratic equation.
History is about detective work and analysis of data from contradictory, competing, and fragmentary sources. A historian's job would be way easier if there were objective records of the past, but every primary source has a bias and an agenda, and a historian has to sort through them to make sense of the past. These documents were made by a person with a much different experience and worldview than the modern reader, and can be full of different assumptions and omissions that you have to make sense of.
We're discovering new things daily about documents and artifacts that we've had for centuries simply because historical study has gotten better about incorporating researchers from a non-ivory tower background. So much of history is studying individual and cultural choices as well that have shaped the course of civilizations.
Learning history in general is important because it makes you more aware of our species history and the reality around us. Just like math. I find great value in learning history. But if you insist on a comparison, from my standpoint, this is what I think.
It starts with Bloom's Taxonomy. I believe that math requires higher orders of learning than some other subjects.
Unlike history, I think, math involves higher levels of learning and creativity. Math doesn't just require memorization (the lowest level of learning), it requires understanding. You cannot simply memorize math. You can memorize the quadratic equation, but if you don't know how to use it, it's worthless. But it goes even further: math, for example, can be used for creativity and knowledge synthesis--the highest form of learning. We can use the quadratic equation to create new knowledge, inventions and truth. That is a large depth in learning that math provides. You cannot pass an advanced math exam by just memorizing or even discussing or pondering facts from lecture. You have to practice and understand and prove and create information. That's a very deep level of learning.
Sure, with history, you can discover new things about history by knowing other things about history. But at its apex, knowing history can be conquered by just rote memorization and regurgitation of facts (I guess high level history learning however does include a lot of good judgment based on established facts, just like math, though). People who are good at absorbing facts can be very good historians. But what about creativity? Knowledge synthesis? History doesn't seem to expand these learning processes. It seems to be a more shallow subject of learning depth despite how vast and broad it is.
Not to shit or shame on history, though. It's a wonderful, rich subject and important to study!
I'm not quite sure it's that history can be "conquered by just rote memorization", but rather, that the way it's taught around schools allows for that and that impression.
I understand the point you're making. Math as a subject at the bare minimum requires understanding, and to an extent actual application. For many people however, history stays at memorization, even though there are higher levels to it
I'm not quite sure it's that history can be "conquered by just rote memorization", but rather, that the way it's taught around schools allows for that and that impression.
I understand the point you're making. Math as a subject at the bare minimum requires understanding, and to an extent actual application. For many people however, history stays at memorization, even though there are higher levels to it
And write in cursive and shit? Any time I have to do a math problem I can just flip up the calculator on my Apple iPhone 6 and I dare u to try and write something in cursive
It would've made school way more fun if teachers would have been real about what stuff was good to know. Like hb having a class about filing taxes or shopping for credit cards
Cursive itself isn't important but learning cursive helped me to form my most comfortable and efficient way of writing by mixing print and cursive. Too bad in a decade or so people aren't going to write anymore but type things now.
As long as people keep buying lottery tickets, not enough people will have taken statistics.Im talking more about high school math like algebra, geometry, and statistics
What does GAF think about History? How important is it that a working adult know all the president's birthdays?
OP sounds spoiled, entitled and ready for his McDonalds late shift
If computer programming/computer science was a mandatory part of education from at least middle school, I think fewer kids would find math pointless.
Having taught many of them, today's high school students largely have shitty hand writing, shitty spelling, and shitty grammar. I blame texting and auto-correct.