• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Remember when teachers told u math was important

Status
Not open for further replies.
Names and dates are the most useless parts of history though. Actually learning about history, the how and the why, that's incredibly important for a working adult.

The most memorable event when I was taking Ancient and Medieval History was when we did the Roman Empire and my teacher showed the graffiti written on the bathroom walls.

If you didn't know the origin, you would have thought it was stuff found today. It humanized the period and made the class realize that no matter the time period, people still had behaviors we can relate to today.
 
The most practical math is percentages. Percentages are everywhere.

From your taxes, to your mortgage rate, to figuring out business expenses, and so on.

In personal finance using percentages is much easier than other methods of figuring stuff out.

Housing should never be more than 2/3 of take home pay. Save at least 15 percent of pretax income. And many other rules of thumb.
 
And write in cursive and shit? Any time I have to do a math problem I can just flip up the calculator on my Apple iPhone 6

Yeah, why the fuck are we taught the basics in life? Fuck.

and I dare u to try and write something in cursive

wait are you serious?

It would've made school way more fun if teachers would have been real about what stuff was good to know. Like hb having a class about filing taxes or shopping for credit cards

Oh I get it,

You watched that stupid fucking music video, "Don't Stay In School".
 
The most memorable event when I was taking Ancient and Medieval History was when we did the Roman Empire and my teacher showed the graffiti written on the bathroom walls.

If you didn't know the origin, you would have thought it was stuff found today. It humanized the period and made the class realize that no matter the time period, people still had behaviors we can relate to today.

I can see it now..."Here shat Bartholomew"..."Hither to 'round beginnings of dark on the first day for a gay time"
 
I think it would help if schools taught math better. They have so much to teach in such a short time. Kids lose interest fast and burnout. I think teachers burnout somewhat as well.
 
I think it would help if schools taught math better. They have so much to teach in such a short time. Kids lose interest fast and burnout. I think teachers burnout somewhat as well.

At the high school level, they actually teach very little actual content. You blow through 4 years of concepts in a single semester in college. Most of the time is dedicated to practice, and letting the ideas sink in. Which is a good thing.
 
Hey! I write all of my correspondence in cursive, and begin each and everyone with, "To my darling Rose..." Very important if you want to get ahead in life!
 
Even now with all the calculators, I wish more people can grasp basic math. First they tip it wrong in the calculator or don't even know how to do it when it's a bit more complicated than very basic math. Second, once they have a result, they don't even have the slightest idea whether a result is right or wrong, because they've never learned math correctly and can't estimate shit.
 
If you didn't know the origin, you would have thought it was stuff found today. It humanized the period and made the class realize that no matter the time period, people still had behaviors we can relate to today.
While technology has rapidly advanced people haven't changed all that much in the last few thousand years. But that's the sort of thing that's hard to see without a proper history education.
 
I wish I were good at math. For some reason my brain can comprehend everything but stuff beyond algebra and geometry. High school was painful. No matter how much I studied, I fell flat. Also important to note and add chemistry was very difficult for me too.
 
Wow the misconception about what legit history is astounds me, but is unfortunately not too surprising.
History is not about rote memorization or knowing random facts.

Math is incredibly important, also no disputing that.
 
I study Physics in college and I'm just in love with math, feel bad for you op...
I wish we spent more time focusing on the logical reasoning and problem solving that's in college level math. The power of math in explaining almost everything we can see in the universe is one of the greatest human accomplishments, and something that everyone should be a part of.

OP, have you noticed that you use, like, no high school stuff in your day to day life? The reasons we teach it to everybody are that these things represent the groundwork of all human knowledge, we don't know what people are going to do ahead of time, and because there are skills you build by doing those things that aren't directly taught. English helps you analyze text and express yourself (but almost no one needs to use Shakespeare). Science helps you understand how the world works and how to get information out of data (but almost no one needs to know that Cesium explodes in water). Math helps with logic and creative problem solving (but how many people need to know what a cosine is day to day)?
 
Sure, with history, you can discover new things about history by knowing other things about history. But at its apex, knowing history can be conquered by just rote memorization and regurgitation of facts (I guess high level history learning however does include a lot of good judgment based on established facts, just like math, though). People who are good at absorbing facts can be very good historians. But what about creativity? Knowledge synthesis? History doesn't seem to expand these learning processes. It seems to be a more shallow subject of learning depth despite how vast and broad it is.

History at a high level isn't just memorizing facts; that's like saying that math is just memorizing your times tables or the quadratic equation. History is about detective work and analysis of data from contradictory, competing, and fragmentary sources. A historian's job would be way easier if there were objective records of the past, but every primary source has a bias and an agenda, and a historian has to sort through them to make sense of the past. These documents were made by a person with a much different experience and worldview than the modern reader, and can be full of different assumptions and omissions that you have to make sense of.

We're discovering new things daily about documents and artifacts that we've had for centuries simply because historical study has gotten better about incorporating researchers from a non-ivory tower background. So much of history is studying individual and cultural choices as well that have shaped the course of civilizations.
 
Wow the misconception about what legit history is astounds me, but is unfortunately not too surprising.
History is not about rote memorization or knowing random facts.

Math is incredibly important, also no disputing that.

I assume you're responding to my post. If you would like to discuss this further, then please explain to me how knowing history compares to the understanding, application, and knowledge synthesis of knowing math like I described in the Taxonomy.
 
If you skip the basic math stuff in school, you're completely fucked if you ever decide that you want to do something math related as a career.
 
But they can just teach math in college once u have a major that involves advanced math??

Well, because it gives a person an Idea in High School of whether or not that want to have a degree which heavily uses math. Not to mention it's needed for some Physics and Chem classes as well.
Without it there wouldn't be much in High School honestly.
 
Teaching math isn't just to get an answer. It helps develop logical thought and problem solving for many things in life. It's not the answer that's important, it's the thought process to get there that is the benefit.

It's the same thing when kids say they don't have to learn anything because they can just google it. Looking up something is not intelligence. A lack of common knowledge is just ignorance and a lack of awareness.

I've heard teachers say that tech dependence has just resulted in very poor logical thought and reasoning in students. Problem solving skills disappear when all they're relying on is tech to provide the easy answer.
 
I was forced to write cursive through my elementary education (late 80s to mid 90s), but gave it up within a year or so of starting high school. When you can't even read your own notes, what's the point? Printing was slow at first, but I can now write fast enough that the legibility far outweighs any loss in speed.

You actually don't need to be that incredibly gifted at math for most STEM fields.

You can forget calc after first year in a lot of programs, but you still regularly use grade 10-11 level math (plus basic parametric stats). You can't exactly cut 10 years worth of primary and secondary math and do well in STEM.
 
The fact that the OP puts cursive and math on the same level makes me question whether he's a good judge of useful school topics...

Forget second grade math. Mathematics, at its core, is conceptualization and problem solving. Hard to beat that.
 
You actually don't need to be that incredibly gifted at math for most STEM fields.

Yeah but imagine having to start from Algebra 1 in College (Which you can do of course) It would hold back your graduating(remember Eng courses have math Prerequisite) even more than engineering typically does.
 
History at a high level isn't just memorizing facts; that's like saying that math is just memorizing your times tables or the quadratic equation.

I disagree because the complexity just doesn't seem comparable. At basic levels for both subjects, yes you are just memorizing facts in either math or history (like memorizing where George Washington was born versus counting numbers from 1 to 100). But in what way does complexity evolve with history compared to math? Once we progress to higher levels, you cannot perform math without inherent understanding. Meanwhile, you can write about a historical topic based off memorization of facts.

History is about detective work and analysis of data from contradictory, competing, and fragmentary sources. A historian's job would be way easier if there were objective records of the past, but every primary source has a bias and an agenda, and a historian has to sort through them to make sense of the past. These documents were made by a person with a much different experience and worldview than the modern reader, and can be full of different assumptions and omissions that you have to make sense of.

Ah, I see. Well that makes sense, yes. In that case, high level history requires the utilization of judgment and understanding come from knowledge of facts. That is similar to math.

We're discovering new things daily about documents and artifacts that we've had for centuries simply because historical study has gotten better about incorporating researchers from a non-ivory tower background. So much of history is studying individual and cultural choices as well that have shaped the course of civilizations.

I respect this.

I think maybe the difference between math and history is not as large as I thought earlier in this thread. Thanks for your inputs.

But considering math does evolve in a pace of complexity in a way that is just inconceivable, and considering math also includes heavy creativity and knowledge synthesis, I think maybe math is still a deeper subject of learning and complexity than history. Although there are similarities. Then again, I'm probably opinionated out of ignorance since I am not a historian.
 
Learning history in general is important because it makes you more aware of our species history and the reality around us. Just like math. I find great value in learning history. But if you insist on a comparison, from my standpoint, this is what I think.

It starts with Bloom's Taxonomy. I believe that math requires higher orders of learning than some other subjects.


Unlike history, I think, math involves higher levels of learning and creativity. Math doesn't just require memorization (the lowest level of learning), it requires understanding. You cannot simply memorize math. You can memorize the quadratic equation, but if you don't know how to use it, it's worthless. But it goes even further: math, for example, can be used for creativity and knowledge synthesis--the highest form of learning. We can use the quadratic equation to create new knowledge, inventions and truth. That is a large depth in learning that math provides. You cannot pass an advanced math exam by just memorizing or even discussing or pondering facts from lecture. You have to practice and understand and prove and create information. That's a very deep level of learning.

Sure, with history, you can discover new things about history by knowing other things about history. But at its apex, knowing history can be conquered by just rote memorization and regurgitation of facts (I guess high level history learning however does include a lot of good judgment based on established facts, just like math, though). People who are good at absorbing facts can be very good historians. But what about creativity? Knowledge synthesis? History doesn't seem to expand these learning processes. It seems to be a more shallow subject of learning depth despite how vast and broad it is.

Not to shit or shame on history, though. It's a wonderful, rich subject and important to study!

I'm not quite sure it's that history can be "conquered by just rote memorization", but rather, that the way it's taught around schools allows for that and that impression.

I understand the point you're making. Math as a subject at the bare minimum requires understanding, and to an extent actual application. For many people however, history stays at memorization, even though there are higher levels to it
 
I'm not quite sure it's that history can be "conquered by just rote memorization", but rather, that the way it's taught around schools allows for that and that impression.

I understand the point you're making. Math as a subject at the bare minimum requires understanding, and to an extent actual application. For many people however, history stays at memorization, even though there are higher levels to it

Yes, that's actually probably a better way of putting what I was trying to say. Thanks.

I want to reiterate that I love history. I am envious of people who got to study it in more detail than me.
 
First I'll mention that I remember seeing a study (I think it was posted on here somewhere) that found that people who have a strong fundamental understanding in math, regardless of their ultimate career, are much better off and have a better standard of life than those who don't.

For me, I think it's important that you have at least a sound understanding of algebra and geometry. In general, I think the more someone know about the world, how it works, why it works the way it does, makes for just better people.
 
I'm not quite sure it's that history can be "conquered by just rote memorization", but rather, that the way it's taught around schools allows for that and that impression.

I understand the point you're making. Math as a subject at the bare minimum requires understanding, and to an extent actual application. For many people however, history stays at memorization, even though there are higher levels to it

Yeah history isn't just rote memorization as it's more about coming to conclusion and trying to understand why something happens and the impacts of the dates you are memorizing.
 
Cursive was hella dumb, and my hand writing is messy, so it makes my cursive look even worse.

Math on the other hand, while I thought geometry was pretty hard in high school, was pretty great. Plus I'm going into IT and I have to take calculus D:
 
And write in cursive and shit? Any time I have to do a math problem I can just flip up the calculator on my Apple iPhone 6 and I dare u to try and write something in cursive

It would've made school way more fun if teachers would have been real about what stuff was good to know. Like hb having a class about filing taxes or shopping for credit cards

While some basic 'getting through life' classes would certainly be helpful, math is an incredibly important tool in many jobs (such as my own), and you can't wait until college to start learning it if you want to build a strong foundation.
 
Cursive itself isn't important but learning cursive helped me to form my most comfortable and efficient way of writing by mixing print and cursive. Too bad in a decade or so people aren't going to write anymore but type things now.
 
Cursive itself isn't important but learning cursive helped me to form my most comfortable and efficient way of writing by mixing print and cursive. Too bad in a decade or so people aren't going to write anymore but type things now.

Having taught many of them, today's high school students largely have shitty hand writing, shitty spelling, and shitty grammar. I blame texting and auto-correct.
 
What does GAF think about History? How important is it that a working adult know all the president's birthdays?

If you are a true red white and blue blooded American you had better well know that Teddy Roosevelt birthday is October 27th.

In all seriousness History is less about names and dates, and more about understanding why events happened, how those events impacted the time, and how those events have shaped us now. It's also about understanding how people thought in the past and how society had changed because of those thoughts.

There are many important lessons that studying history can give beyond just who was the president of the United States when the atomic bombs were dropped on Japan, or the largest land empire ever was created by the mongols. Things like being able to fact check politicians, or even just having an understanding of why certain laws were passed and probably shouldn't be repealed; there are some great military strategies that can be learned, or background knowledge on global politics and foreign policy. There are also many things that studying your areas local history can teach you.

Sure not everyone needs to know that it isn't a great idea to invade Russia and an even worse idea to invade Russia and still be there during the winter, or that convincing the peseantry to eat potatoes could have potentially prevented a revolution or two, but that whole "learn from the mistakes of our forebears" thing really does apply to some. Also it is completely possible to work critical thinking skills into a classroom by asking questions like why is it a bad idea to try a fight a land battle in Russia during the winter, or what we're the major causes of the great depression, how could the stock market crash have been avoided and give examples of how the depression has had a lasting impact in today's legal policy. Many history courses also emphasize being able to analyze, and interpret documents and weigh various sources to create a new interpretation of past events.

I personally think history is quite important, I'm a little biased about the subject though.
 
OP sounds spoiled, entitled and ready for his McDonalds late shift.

All knowledge is good, math is the most important. Teach you to see the logic in the world.
 
If computer programming/computer science was a mandatory part of education from at least middle school, I think fewer kids would find math pointless.

this is the best post in the thread.

"what am I gonna use math for in the real world?"

"i dunno, but in this class you can use it to make videogames"

"holy shit"
 
Having taught many of them, today's high school students largely have shitty hand writing, shitty spelling, and shitty grammar. I blame texting and auto-correct.

I feel the bigger issue is High Schools don't encourage you writing to be legible. I don't care about cursive but I feel there needs to be a bigger emphasis print clarity.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom