• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Report: Colorado’s marijuana tax revenue now exceeds $500 million

GK86

Homeland Security Fail
Link to article.

Link to report.

In the three-and-a-half years since the state began allowing adults to purchase marijuana for recreational use, cannabis has contributed more than half a billion dollars in tax revenue to both state and local coffers.

That's according to a report released Wednesday by the Denver-based marijuana consulting firm VS Strategies. Based on data from the Colorado Department of Revenue, the firm tabulated that cannabis-related taxes from 2014 through mid-2017 totaled $506,143,635.

That includes the taxes on purchases of marijuana for recreational or medical use, as well as fees paid by cannabis businesses. The tax figure is substantially more than some experts predicted in 2012 when Colorado voters approved Amendment 64, which legalized recreational marijuana. At that time, some analysts projected the state would net between $5 and $22 million a year in taxes.

A majority of money has gone to fund K-12 education (even with that, Colorado's education funding badly lags behind most of the rest of the country). Amendment 64 requires the first $40 million in tax revenue be allotted for school construction.

The remainder of the state's share of cannabis taxes helps finance health care, health education, law enforcement and substance abuse prevention and treatment programs.

Local governments, which tax marijuana separately from the state, have used their share of the funds in a variety of ways.

Pueblo County, for instance, used some of the cash to start what's believed to be the first cannabis-tax-funded college scholarship program. In 2017, it distributed $420,000 among 210 students.

The Denver-area city of Edgewater, which has six marijuana dispensaries and a population of 5,300, has used its cannabis windfall to upgrade outdated infrastructure. Cannabis taxes have generated more than $1.4 million for the city, which CBS Denver reports makes up 20 percent of Edgewater's annual budget.
 

NandoGip

Member
Marijuana drug trades been funding communities for a long time

This report is the definition of the gov't always being late AF
 

Amory

Member
I dont use pot anymore, but I cant wait for the revenue bump Massachusetts gets when we start selling here
 

Chichikov

Member
I still hate consumption taxes and taxes that their revenues are designated to go toward specific goals, but it sure is better than spending money trying to enforce that stupid prohibition.

p.s.
At that time, some analysts projected the state would net between $5 and $22 million a year in taxes.
I'll take analysts who never been to Boulder for $200.
 

Baconmonk

Member
They just raised the tax for recreational to 29%, and most people I've spoken to are totally fine with paying it as well. A flooded market of growers has driven prices way down anyhow. The way Colorado has handled the industry is a great template for the coming states to form their regulations around.
 

Amory

Member
I still hate consumption taxes and taxes that their revenues are designated to go toward specific goals, but it sure is better than spending money trying to enforce that stupid prohibition.

p.s.

I'll take analysts who never been to Boulder for $200.
Whats the problem with a consumption tax for weed? It's a concession that makes opponents in a state feel a little better and the money can go towards beneficial things for everyone. Taxed legal weed available in controlled environments is a win win
 

Nekofrog

Banned
imagine if the government hadnt been so short sighted for so long

But is it like other sin taxes? Basically a tax on the poor?

The biggest spenders on legal recreational marijuana are middle and upper class people with disposable income.

we buy it like water in my house
 

norm9

Member
Whats the problem with a consumption tax for weed? It's a concession that makes opponents in a state feel a little better and the money can go towards beneficial things for everyone. Taxed legal weed available in controlled environments is a win win

It's also a medicine, so maybe taxing medicine that patients need isn't cool? I don't know if regular pills and whatnot are taxed.
 

Gallbaro

Banned
If the poor don't want this tax then they don't have to smoke weed. You'd be shocked at how little people who don't buy weed end up not paying taxes on weed purchases.

Cigarette taxes really have not done much to deter lower class smoking, the effect was noticeable at the middle and upper classes.
 

HStallion

Now what's the next step in your master plan?
Cigarette taxes really have not done much to deter lower class smoking, the effect was noticeable at the middle and upper classes.

Isn't this partly because cigarette companies still go after minority communities aggressively?
 

xxracerxx

Don't worry, I'll vouch for them.
I can honestly say I do not think my experiences in Amsterdam provide any insight as to who is shopping in Colorado.

I mean, who did you see buying weed in Amsterdam? If it was well dressed people that are relatively well off...guess what, that is who is buying pot in legal states.
 
In 2017, it distributed $420,000 among 210 students.

UKKzYHiLBoELnWV-400x225-noPad.jpg
 

numble

Member
I still hate consumption taxes and taxes that their revenues are designated to go toward specific goals, but it sure is better than spending money trying to enforce that stupid prohibition.

p.s.

I'll take analysts who never been to Boulder for $200.

What is wrong with a hotel or bed tax? The local city does not collect corporate or individual income tax, that goes to the federal or state government (and sometimes the state decides there should be no corporate tax). Tourists use infrastructure as much or if more than locals.

Most developed countries have been able to design a VAT system to support healthcare, social welfare programs and income redistribution programs.

Multinational companies and rich individuals can avoid income taxes very easily. It is harder to avoid VAT and consumption taxes.
 

led4lyfe

Member
Lived in Denver last year; beautiful city and I believe the weed market has made the city and state even better.
 

Saganator

Member
The biggest spenders on legal recreational marijuana are middle and upper class people with disposable income.

we buy it like water in my house

No lies detected. Whenever I see an older person in the store I go to, they go all out. Edibles, large quantities of multiple strains, oils, it's crazy.

Also, the store I go to is right by a Costco, every time I'm there it's packed with soccer moms and other types of people you wouldn't expect to see in there. It's gotten to the point where there there is no type of person you don't expect to see there, everyone loves weed!
 

Goofalo

Member
I like how when I go back to Denver to see my folks, the dispensaries give me the medical price due to my diagnosis.
 

Malleymal

You now belong to FMT.
I chipped in to this tax last weekend when I visited Denver and Boulder last week. I saw the tax and yea this all makes sense.
 

Goofalo

Member
That much in revenue and they are still behind in education funding? How?

Bill Owens was the start of the defunding of public education in Colorado.

The NIMBY conservative/libertarian suburban voters won't pass bond issues to fund school and the Republicn state legislature have been killing funding for higher ed and public school for decades now.

Colorado isn't all hippies and weed. It's mostly NIMBY Helen Lovejoys
 

dabig2

Member

Stinkles

Clothed, sober, cooperative
I live in seattle and most people died after the legalization and everything is burning and soaked in blood.
 

Velcro Fly

Member
Illinois you better get on that. Legalized recreation marijuana should be a campaign issue for governor because of how much revenue it can generate.
 
A majority of money has gone to fund K-12 education (even with that, Colorado’s education funding badly lags behind most of the rest of the country)

So even after an increase of $250,000,000 over 5 years (o ~$50,000,000 per year), their educational funding still "badly lags behind most of the rest of the country"?
That's bad.
 
Top Bottom