Generic
Member
RE4 remake was just "Resident Evil 4". No IV.This wasn't lost on me even before I posted. I am still going by the way they've marketed their previous RE games. I guess we'll see.
RE4 remake was just "Resident Evil 4". No IV.This wasn't lost on me even before I posted. I am still going by the way they've marketed their previous RE games. I guess we'll see.
The dude saying "Bio Hazard" on the title screen of RE9 goes hard compared to "Resident Evil."
What if they do the idea I wanted them to do with RE 1 and 0 (Combining both campaigns into one continuous game)?
Capcom isn't goint to delist REmake, I don't see why anyone would have a problem with a remakeNothing wrong with admitting you're a casual and it's too hard for you. No yellow paint and all that.
I think the new "in-game model" is accurate this timeThey couldn't fix her duck lips. Sad.
Because it's a spoiler!!!No more "Code" in the title.
Just Resident Evil: Veronica
Alright well they did Resident EVII, Resident Evil VIIIage, and Resident Evil Re9uiem. The V is pretty prominent in the teaser, it's no longer Code Veronica, and some of the lore has had changes in the previous remakes. Call me crazy but it doesn't seem like a massive stretch.RE4 remake was just "Resident Evil 4". No IV.
Claire's actress is a smoke show, dayum.I think the new "in-game model" is accurate this time![]()
![]()
They do. Coop ai partners was a stupid idea.They don't need to overhaul RE5 and RE6 because they don't suffer with constant soft and hardlocks.
Day 1, but think they could have done better on the trailer. Didn't realize what it was at first due to the whole starting sequence being new.
That was the point. They were going for the big crowd reaction at people figuring out what it was and they got it. Claire didn't even speak to the lady because they didn't wanna give it away, but she definitely will the final game.Day 1, but think they could have done better on the trailer. Didn't realize what it was at first due to the whole starting sequence being new.
The true Resident Evil V.
Right on, they really turned Code Veronica into a numbered main-line entry with this: RE VIt's not unreasonable to assume CV remake is taking the place of RE5 in the remake progression and that the prominent V is supporting evidence. We'll likely get RE6 remake after this.
V = 5But why calling just "Veronica" and not "Code: Veronica"?
You're a retard.Well, it's crapcom, definition of the creatively bankrupt publisher
What a beautyI think the new "in-game model" is accurate this time![]()
![]()
Damn she's pretty.I think the new "in-game model" is accurate this time![]()
![]()
If they showed the 3rd person it would have been immediately obvious that it was Claire Redfield. I assume the 1st person was to maintain the surprise factor until the end.So is it another 1st person one? Kind of a turn-off, but.... I mean, I'm going to play it regardless.
It's not unreasonable to assume CV remake is taking the place of RE5 in the remake progression and that the prominent V is supporting evidence. We'll likely get RE6 remake after this.
Mowing down zombies in Africa was controversial at the time and would cause a lot of meltdowns today.RE5 is the best‑selling game in the series, I don't see why they'd skip it and go straight to 6. Sure, they could turn 6 into a good game with a remake, but it's definitely the riskier move.
Mowing down zombies in Africa was controversial at the time and would cause a lot of meltdowns today.
It's understandable if they don't want to deal with the drama by inevitably creating a culture war battleground.
Mowing down zombies in Africa was controversial at the time and would cause a lot of meltdowns today.
It's understandable if they don't want to deal with the drama by inevitably creating a culture war battleground.
Fail to see how Capcom can do it but Sony can't...I think the new "in-game model" is accurate this time![]()
![]()