Tieno
Member
What seperates this game is exactly what you don't care for; the mixing of sci-fi elements with WWII settings. I am personally sick of WWII shooters (along with many others). This is a refreshing twist on a WWII shooter and very welcome by many. You can also see from their web material that they are REALLY behind the idea and not just half-assing it. They put in a lot of work to create this alternate past and I really appreciate it.
If you aren't buying that, well, the game isn't going to do much for you. It sounds like you have pre-determined tastes as to what goes where and aren't open to mixing things up. That's fine.
A lot of people dislike monochromatic art design (though Gears of War is very much the same on that front), but others of us really appreciate it.
Definately a lover of the sci-fi and 50's era and alternate history. I love that sort of stuff and that's what attracts me in this game, the story angle (and of course the large scale battles). What I'm rather cold about is the art style, maybe it's the brownish color scheme, but then again the grey colors in GoW don't bother me at all. What it boils down to is, for me I guess, that I'd immediately recognize GoW as GoW. Resistance doesn't have that same recognizable style it seems, or is it because Resistance is not as exaggerated as Gears? But I'm remaing very hopeful because that London bridge stuff was pure awesome.