Considering the patents they held at the time - and the business motivations that pushed Microsoft to include those systems... there's not much of a reason to assume they weren't considering it. The role of the press is often analysis, and it made a lot of sense in context. They ended up dodging the bullet for sure - but no foul in thinking they'd follow what seemed to be an industry mandated trend.
I sat down with Yoshida a few hours after the PS4 reveal tonight and one of the first things I asked was whether used games would be blocked.
"Do you want us to do that?" he asked.
No, I said. I think, if you buy something on a disc, that you have a kind of moral contract with the person you've bought it from that you retain some of that value and you can pass it on.
Do you agree, I asked?
"Yes. That's the general expectation by consumers," said Yoshida. "They purchase physical form, they want to use it everywhere, right? So that's my expectation."
So if someone buys a PlayStation 4 game, I asked, you're not going to stop them reselling it?
"Aaaah," was Yoshida's initial answer, but seemingly only because he'd forgotten his line. "So what was our official answer to our internal question?" he asked his Japanese PR advisor. The advisor stepped in but didn't seem to answer clearly, at least to my ears. Yoshida then took control again firmly:
"So, used games can play on PS4. How is that?"
Kotaku saying that the sorceress in Dragon's Crown is part of a lolicon fantasy
![]()
the whole "they're japanese they don't know better" shtick is so tiring
The Sony Too stuff in 2013 was insufferable.
All those Ars Technica graphs showing the X1 not that far behind on a not scaled properly graph, while at the same time saying don't look too much into the numbers of PS4 launch sales.
2013 was a bad year for press.
Oh, I agree. Sure, ME3's ending was a huge disappointment, but people were writing off the entire game because of that. I think it was indeed a stellar experience sowhat marred by the ending and lack of impact your choices had. The extended cut made up for a lot of the ending's shortcomings IMO but it was way too little and too late.
The entire mess surrounding that was insane.
For me, the biggest issue with the Mass Effect 3 ending is just how little everything else mattered. Throughout the whole saga, we were told that our choices mattered...and then we get a multiple choice ending that takes none of our previous decisions into account.
I think Schrier's original complaint was hyperbolic (though I agreed then, and still do, that the character designs were clearly sexual for the sole purpose of selling the game), but Kamitani's response of essentially calling him gay was fucking terrible. How anyone believed "No I just wanted to ask him if he liked dwarves" is beyond me.
Kotaku saying that the sorceress in Dragon's Crown is part of a lolicon fantasy
![]()
Not related to Game Press but I remember that before Captain Toad was released a gaffer made a thread discussing how "Captain Toad is so sexist because you have to rescue Toadette".
When people thought that Atlus US was censoring Persona 5 because Morganna was in front of Anne's chest.
I'm gonna go with the recent "Nintendo is joking about Gamergate" thing that popped up recently. While I understand why it looked that way at first with the two images that were posted, it was later revealed that the two images were minutes apart and referenced older jokes from Nintendo. Despite this fact, many games journalists still held firm, finding different ways to say that Nintendo was still at fault and not taking any responsibility for their own overreaction or admittance that the original evidence was presented in a less than factual way.
For me, the biggest issue with the Mass Effect 3 ending is just how little everything else mattered. Throughout the whole saga, we were told that our choices mattered...and then we get a multiple choice ending that takes none of our previous decisions into account.
Yeah, the journalism trying to downplay the PS4's launch success and defending/apologising MS was really embarrassing. I remember reading several Eurogamer articles at the time, and they were really negative about the PS4 reveal and launch while being a lot more positive about the Xbone.
Why though? The game starts of in a urban area in Africa, black city people, black city zombies. Tribes or tribal culture still exists in Africa, Australia, New Zealand etc. I thought the tribal zombies were a great addition and looked somewhat believable and not like a offensive caricature.
"Why is racism against black people different from racism against spanish people, I don't understand"
I think Schrier's original complaint was hyperbolic (though I agreed then, and still do, that the character designs were clearly sexual for the sole purpose of selling the game), but Kamitani's response of essentially calling him gay was fucking terrible. How anyone believed "No I just wanted to ask him if he liked dwarves" is beyond me.
Wait what!?
seriously?
I'm cutting a documentary, and have scrubbed through 140 hours of footage, clips and interviews of about 16 nations in Africa. I think it's a beautiful continent with beautiful people. There are huge cities, as well as taut tribes who live just as prosperously. Quite frankly, there isn't enough media that uses this setting.
And there's a lot of misinformation out there. The team at CAPCOM did in fact visit the continent. They took photo references. There is ZERO ill intent in their depiction of the setting. Further, it's a science fiction story deeply rooted in mythology and anthropology - it runs with the "African origin of modern humans" and spins it as a part of the game's lore; an idea that's rarely utilized.
As someone else mentioned, it's about exploiting the specificities of the locale. If I'm writing a horror story in Afghanistan, you bet I'll be touching on ancient ruins and folklore. Afghanistan is beautiful too, with its snow capped mountains and sprawling cities - but if you played MGSV, you'd think it's nothing but military camps. At least RE5 has the decency (and narrative chops) to start the hero's journey in a small (and accurate) town, eventually moving up to the sea port, and then mines, and then across Saharan steppes, until it escalates to remote villages who are affected by the remote labs. In fact, I took it as as an example of a multi-billion dollar corporation exhausting the resources of a small nation - which let's be real, it happens all too often. The plot and its themes, and how it unfolds, is very natural and appropriate for the genre. It's a blockbuster.
Is something like the b-movie Green Inferno also misaligned and tone-deaf for depicting an uncontacted people in South America as cannibals?
Probably the whole Lords of Shadow 2/"rape" thing. Quite a huge reach by the journalist
The Tomb Raider rape scene.
Even if she would have been raped, I dont actually see how thats a problem. Its a storytelling device.
In movies it is, in tv shows it is, in books it is and of course it can also used in games...
Yeah, the journalism trying to downplay the PS4's launch success and defending/apologising MS was really embarrassing. I remember reading several Eurogamer articles at the time, and they were really negative about the PS4 reveal and launch while being a lot more positive about the Xbone.
That's racist as fuck.There is a story note that explains that they returned to those tribal ways after being infected with the virus. It's however easy to miss and arguably just window dressing.
I wouldn't even say light. It's very obvious.Is this a gamergate light thread? Let's complain about things like sexism and racism being perceived in games without actually looking bad while doing it.
Being Japanese devs they probably didn't know much about African culture and was going to be viewed as being racist.
Anyone who thinks that capcom or the devs made this game with any intent of being racist is what I consider ridiculous.
...and all that is fine if that's how you want to take it, but when you get to the 1950's depiction of African people with the explanation that the virus is causing them to regress (thus giving the implication that this is how all African people are deep inside), then you get to a problem that can't so easily be explained.
RE4 did have you fight monks who were armed with crossbows and catapults, so it wouldn't even be that out of order.Imagine if in RE7 you suddenly encounter a village of americans all dressed like Cowboys with old revolvers and nobody even reacts to it. Surely everybody would be fine with that?
And that's not even racist, just stupid.
You jest but a lot of Europe was racist to the Spanish, especially the English. They just didnt give a fuck because they owned half the planet. I'm not sure the Japanese are racist towards Spaniards but they sure have been towards black people."Why is racism against black people different from racism against spanish people, I don't understand"
(though I agreed then, and still do, that the character designs were clearly sexual for the sole purpose of selling the game)
Yeah, living in enormous castles is a really harmful racist stereotype that Spanish people still have to deal with today, poor bastards.But Europe being stuck in the middle ages in RE4 is fine.
"Why is racism against black people different from racism against spanish people, I don't understand"
What are some ridiculous things games have been accused of?
(IMO)Anyone remember Resident evil 5 devs (capcom) being accused of being racist?
Devs being Japanese,setting the game in Africa with a partners from Africa didn't stop them from implying that.
I'm sure there are far worst examples tho.
Being Japanese devs they probably didn't know much about African culture and was going to be viewed as being racist.
Anyone who thinks that capcom or the devs made this game with any intent of being racist is what I consider ridiculous.
I'm not sure where you're going with when comparing stuff to Eli Roth tripeI'm cutting a documentary, and have scrubbed through 140 hours of footage, clips and interviews of about 16 nations in Africa. I think it's a beautiful continent with beautiful people. There are huge cities, as well as taut tribes who live just as prosperously. Quite frankly, there isn't enough media that uses this setting.
And there's a lot of misinformation out there. The team at CAPCOM did in fact visit the continent. They took photo references. There is ZERO ill intent in their depiction of the setting. Further, it's a science fiction story deeply rooted in mythology and anthropology - it runs with the "African origin of modern humans" and spins it as a part of the game's lore; an idea that's rarely utilized.
As someone else mentioned, it's about exploiting the specificities of the locale. If I'm writing a horror story in Afghanistan, you bet I'll be touching on ancient ruins and folklore. Afghanistan is beautiful too, with its snow capped mountains and sprawling cities - but if you played MGSV, you'd think it's nothing but military camps. At least RE5 has the decency (and narrative chops) to start the hero's journey in a small (and accurate) town, eventually moving up to the sea port, and then mines, and then across saharan steppes, until it escalates to remote villages who are affected by the remote labs. In fact, I took it as as an example of a multi-billion dollar corporation exhausting the resources of a small nation - which let's be real, it happens all too often. The plot and its themes, and how it unfolds, is very natural and appropriate for the genre. It's a blockbuster.
Is something like the b-movie Green Inferno also misaligned and tone-deaf for depicting an uncontacted people in South America as cannibals?
Why though? The game starts of in a urban area in Africa, black city people, black city zombies. Tribes or tribal culture still exists in Africa, Australia, New Zealand etc. I thought the tribal zombies were a great addition and looked somewhat believable and not like a offensive caricature. Don't agree at all about it being racist even though I'm rather sensitive to maters like these. I feel like some of the outfits in the game are much more sexist than anything else is racist.
Edit: And yes. I remember the outrage already started at the first trailer which depicted black zombies in the urban area of the game. I'd still defend the tribal zombies though.
What are some ridiculous things games have been accused of?
(IMO)Anyone remember Resident evil 5 devs (capcom) being accused of being racist?
Devs being Japanese,setting the game in Africa with a partners from Africa didn't stop them from implying that.
I'm sure there are far worst examples tho.
Maybe read the thread plsAmerican going to Spain and murdering hundreds of Spaniard mutants? OK!
American going to Africa and murdering hundreds of African mutants? THAT'S RACIST!