gkrykewy said:Wow, you've really drunk the kool-aid, haven't you? Do you still have your 360, or is it now a stand for your PS3? :lol
Segata Sanshiro said:In all honesty, I can't see them getting through the existing 60 gig PS3s by Christmas.
QFTSegata Sanshiro said:In all honesty, I can't see them getting through the existing 60 gig PS3s by Christmas.
Of course every price drops helps a bit, but 500 dollars still seems to be too much for the big public to buy a PS3.justjohn said:so why has sales increased significantly after the price drop. all these people spending 500 dollars right away, why didnt they just buy it when it was 600 dollars if they can easily afford it
bud said:my hopes of it being 399 by the time mgs4 comes out just died a bit![]()
It's LE. They want to get rid of the 60gb version, because the whole thing cost so much to produce, and 80gb drives are cheaper now.Yoboman said:The price drop seemed to show they were going forward and simply getting the price down as fast as possible. Now they've gone backwards completely.
justjohn said:so why has sales increased significantly after the price drop. all these people spending 500 dollars right away, why didnt they just buy it when it was 600 dollars if they can easily afford it
Aggelos said:They are bitchin' mostly about the price and that means only one thing: many gamers really want a PS3, many gamers have a clear or implicit desire to acquire a PS3 but there is an significant obstacle in getting it (the price). There are many who say "If PS3 goes to $450-400 I'll buy it!", "PS3 for $400?! Hell yeah, I'm jumping in!" etc...
DenogginizerOS said:What is more fun right now at retail? Walking into a store and seeing a PS3 for $499.99 or looking at a stack of X360's at $399.99 and trying to find the one with a new enough manufacture date that may have the Cracker Jack treat of a bonus heat sink inside. Careful kids, don't shake the X360's! You might dislodge the GPU.
Aggelos said:I think they are dead.
You know what, there is beautiful thing about PS3 and it might sound crazy->
A majority of gamers are bitching about PS3's price. That's really good for Sony.
They are not bitching about the future games (in general I'd say the game catalogue of PS3). I mean after E3 '07 there are not many people saying: "Oh man, PS3 has the worst game catalogue in the entire history of game consoles!!!! PS3 games suck balls!!!!".
Also they are not bitching about the hardware by saying for instance "oh man, Sony spent billions of dollars to create such a shitty hardware?? They are pathetic, PS3 has the worst hardware of this gen!!!"
Generally they are not bitching about the internet service that Sony provides etc....etc....etc....
They are bitchin' mostly about the price and that means only one thing: many gamers really want a PS3, many gamers have a clear or implicit desire to acquire a PS3 but there is an significant obstacle in getting it (the price). There are many who say "If PS3 goes to $450-400 I'll buy it!", "PS3 for $400?! Hell yeah, I'm jumping in!" etc...
So Sony by doing all these stuff (discontinuing models-special offers, which you may call it retarded, stupid, etc) is saying to all of you "have patience and it will happen (the significant price drop)!" "Have faith on us and we are going to deliver!!" "Patience & faith is the key my dear customers, please bear that in mind." [/B]
So this major obstacle (price) that gamers have is going to disappear someday (not this year) and Sony knows that. Sony is aware that has one major obstacle presently but also knows that it
is resovable/soluble by time. The problem is clear/distinct/perspicuous, the objectives/goals are clear/perspicuous/distinct and Sony is concentrating on them with all their energy, SSony is working hard in order to provide solutions and to accomplish goals/objectives.
Therefore once the problem has been solved, PS3 will start to produce good sales, since the gamers want it but the price is preventing them from getting it.
DenogginizerOS said:What is more fun right now at retail? Walking into a store and seeing a PS3 for $499.99 or looking at a stack of X360's at $399.99 and trying to find the one with a new enough manufacture date that may have the Cracker Jack treat of a bonus heat sink inside. Careful kids, don't shake the X360's! You might dislodge the GPU.
After they buy their one console, and eventually get a hd-tv, they'll want a next gen movie player in the near or distant future. That's where the cheaper ps3 comes into play, and gets prefernce over a standalone player with the games piled up.gkrykewy said:GAF =/= general public. You're right that everything about the PS3 is lovely aside from the price, but that's a substantial dealbreaker. Most people in the real world will only buy one system this gen, and by the time PS3 is cost-competitive, they'll probably already have done so.
Ah, GAF. Bitch incessantly about the PS3 price, yet scoff at saving a Benjamin like it's as worthless to you as a scrap of toilet paper. Since when did "getting to this kind of money" suddenly make a 20% jump in price insignificant?GitarooMan said:Do people think that someone who is willing to buy a 500 dollar PS3 isn't willing to buy 600 dollar PS3? Seems like when you get to that kind of money, it's not going to make a huge difference to people. It's just I doubt there are tons of people who are like "Eh, I don't want a PS3 for 600, but 500...SOLD!." Not that this bait and switch here isn't stupid.
DeathNote said:After they buy their one console, and eventually get a hd-tv, they'll want a next gen movie player in the near or distant future. That's where the cheaper ps3 comes into play, and gets prefernce over a standalone player with the games piled up.
gkrykewy said:Dude, you are brutal. I get it - you like motorstorm and your 360 broke. This is just trollish bullshit.
DenogginizerOS said:You were the one who brought up the X360. If you don't like my response, don't blame me. I was trying to point out the positive aspects of the PS3 and you accused me of "drinking the kool-aid".
Until they price themselves right out of the market.shantyman said:I don't even care, I already have a PS3. They could raise the price and it would not bother me.
Saoh said:so, Sony will never announce a price drop... instead they will release newer models??
hehehe 1 Terabyte model by 2011
So there will be "infinite" slivers of time where one can get a PS3 for $499.Razoric said:They are doing this to keep manufacturing costs of the HDD down.
IIRC soon 80 GB HDDs will be cheaper to make than 60GB HDDs. So in order to keep the hard drives from being such a huge price burden they are going to have to flush out the existing channel for every upgrade they make. Also keep in mind the new 80 GB is being labeled a special edition, expect the normal edition to fall down to $499 as soon as the 60 GBs are gone.
bachikarn said:what the shit. now MS is probably not going to do price drop. ****
gkrykewy said:Fair enough - the kool-aid bit was because your (first) post read like a press release.
DeaconKnowledge said:So are we in agreement the drop wasn't a drop at all, but a Fire sale?
This much confusion in the marketplace isn't going to do Sony many favours. I expect that the 499 drop got people who were already going to take the plunge on the PS3 eventually to move, but the resurgence won't last long.
You made my point for me, 100 dollars certainly isn't worthless but I don't think that extra one hundred dollars was scaring most of the people off who were interested from buying a PS3 (otherwise don't you think Sony would have kept the 20GB around and more people would have bought it?). You can say you thought the 500 dollar one was a better value and that's a valid point, but had there been only a 600 dollar one at launch would you have not bought it? That's my only point.kaching said:Ah, GAF. Bitch incessantly about the PS3 price, yet scoff at saving a Benjamin like it's as worthless to you as a scrap of toilet paper. Since when did "getting to this kind of money" suddenly make a 20% jump in price insignificant?
Incidently, I'm one of those people who was willing to buy the 500 dollar PS3 but not the 600 dollar one. At launch, it was clearly the better deal yet few others among PS3 buyers then seemed to feel the same. Seems to be this back asswards attitude that there's a point where asking 20% more becomes less and less significant and Sony seems to be willing to exploit that as long as they can.
TheKingsCrown said:So there will be "infinite" slivers of time where one can get a PS3 for $499.
I think this strategy is questionable, however, because it still looks like a gimped system to the consumer. And it will likely confuse them. Your thoughts?
Chiaroscuro said:Well, I only read like 6-7 pages of this madness thread, but that MAKES NO SENSE AT ALL.
Interpretation 1: it is a clearence of the 60GB model, 80 GB will continue to sell with MS for US$ 599 after that. So price drop is a joke.
Interpretation 2: it is a clearence of the 60GB model, as soon it rans out (maybe a couple of months if they are lucky) they will introduce a barebone 80GB model for US$ 499. So the actual bundle with MS is a joke! Why buy it now? MotorStorn isn´t worth US$ 100. Wait a couple of months for the barebone and get MS cheaper (like US$ 40), saving more than $60.
Makes no sense no how you read it. They want to sell this thing or not? Any smart consumer will wait...
Mmm, yeah I get this. What I don't get is what it gains for Sony in terms of installed base, since their installed base, bar some mass belief that PS3 has magically gotten cheaper since the $499 20 GB model, will likely grow at the same rate it has already, with bumps for major titles perhaps. In the end, Japan still rejects the machine and America is semi-luke warm.Razoric said:I think the pricing will start taking a downward turn. The 80 GB version will soon be $499 and then dropped to $399 with the introduction of a $499 120 GB SE version. Then the 120 version will eventually become $399, then later dropped to $299 with the introduction of a $399 240 (?) GB SE version, and so on.