• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Rottenwatch: THE DARK KNIGHT

Status
Not open for further replies.
jsg1p1.jpg
 
:lol :lol the backlash on the dark knight begins. But the idiot from star magazine review just made me lost it:

"Why do comic-book movies want to be serious literature? That’s the problem with this movie the same way it was with 2006’s “Superman Returns.” Instead of being exciting pop-culture entertainment that forces the viewer to take it seriously, the movie takes itself too seriously – and misses the fun in the process...."

Yes. Because a comic book film has to be pop culture and fun at all times. And can't expect to tackle serious issues like revenge, justice, etc. I can understand the complaints about being too long and shit, but this comment is just stupid.
 
DevelopmentArrested said:
How does that turd Hellboy 2 have a higher RT rating than this?

Because people have a hardon for Guillermo del Toro?

Nah, it's because Hellboy 2 is good and the small amount of negative reviews for TDK are of a greater impact because there aren't a huge boatload of positive reviews, which is what I'm expecting come Friday.
 
Snidely Whiplash said:
Yes, yes it is. Almost put me to sleep and the best part only lasts 5 minutes.
Then why does it have a better RT meter than The Dark Knight? It is clearly the better movie in every aspect.

You all didn't see the twist coming....did you?
 
SanjuroTsubaki said:
Then why does it have a better RT meter than The Dark Knight? It is clearly the better movie in every aspect.

You all didn't see the twist coming....did you?


Because....TDK is awesome even though I've not seen it!
 
aparisi2274 said:
Does this prologue exist on the HD DVD version? Or just the BD?

I have the HD DVD version when I got my 360 add on last year.

Just the Blu-ray.
 
Raguel said:
:lol :lol the backlash on the dark knight begins. But the idiot from star magazine review just made me lost it:

"Why do comic-book movies want to be serious literature? That’s the problem with this movie the same way it was with 2006’s “Superman Returns.” Instead of being exciting pop-culture entertainment that forces the viewer to take it seriously, the movie takes itself too seriously – and misses the fun in the process...."

Why do movies want to be serious at all? They should just be fun moving pictures for the masses while us philosophical types read our fancy books. Now, where is my monocle?

Snidely Whiplash said:
Your avatar is enough for that.

Don't you start picking a fight with a fellow Hoosier. I know this has been a bad day for you, but just relax. You'll get to see the movie soon enough and it'll all be gravy.
 
Snidely Whiplash said:
This is a joke right?
Hamburglar your shtick is tired.
This is no joke. I played you all for fools. Using my highly researched Batman knowledge I stealthy maneuvered amongst you like I was one...tricking you ultimately by becoming what you all fear.
 
SanjuroTsubaki said:
This is no joke. I played you all for fools. Using my highly researched Batman knowledge I stealthy maneuvered amongst you like I was one...tricking you ultimately by becoming what you all fear.
I hate you and hope you die.
 
:D

5 stars

*I don't have time to check this for spoilers, so beware*

Forget the great things you’ve heard about The Dark Knight. No matter how lavish the praise or how determined the hyperbole, it’s all understatement. The Dark Knight is I suppose the greatest superhero movie ever made, but it’s so far beyond the limited men in tights genre that attempting to compare it with movies like Spider-Man, Superman, or even Batman Begins is almost laughable. Director Christopher Nolan’s film trumps everything and everyone, including himself. It’s not just the best superhero movie ever made, it’s one of the best movies ever to show up in a theater.

More than a film about a man in a mask trying to stop the bad guy or save the innocent, it’s the story of a city and its people trapped between an unstoppable force and an immovable object. Gotham City is at the center of everything while two men, each mad in their own way, fight to control the hearts and minds of its populace. The Joker (Heath Ledger) bursts onto the scene, and correctly pronounces himself the living embodiment of chaos. This is a man who cares for nothing and wants nothing, except to watch the world crumble around him. Nolan wastes no time explaining Joker’s origin, he is a force of nature and as such has always existed. Faced with pure chaos given form, the people of Gotham turn to selfish terror, and the Joker laughs gleefully as we watch them dance to his tune. Opposing him is Batman (Christian Bale), embodying the pursuit of single-minded justice and, hoping for the best in mankind, he seeks to inspire them to something better through living symbols like Gotham’s new District Attorney Harvey Dent (Aaron Eckhart), or top cop Lt. James Gordon (Gary Oldman). In the end it doesn’t matter whether Batman captures Joker or Joker takes out Batman. What matters is which of them wins the battle for Gotham City’s soul.

The genius of Heath Ledger’s performance as Joker is that in a way, you’ll almost find yourself rooting for him to win. Let him burn it down, if only so we can see how he’ll make it happen. Ledger’s Joker is easily the best on screen villain since Star Trek II’s Khan, a performance unlike anything else you’ve seen. He is at once funny and terrifying. He’ll make you laugh at all the wrong moments, and then cringe in unspeakable terror at all the others. His peals of laughter bounce through the film, echoing long after the credits roll and leaving Joker’s mark not just on this movie, but on cinema. He’s an instant icon. The Oscar buzz for what Ledger has done is not premature. He drives the entire movie with his performance, embodying something so out of control and his own way so true, that the whirlwind of his mere presence destroys all comers.

What I’m getting at here is that most of what’s going on in The Dark Knight is mental. It’s not that there isn’t action, there’s plenty of it, but even when Batman is running around punching people in the head or racing through the streets on his incredible, visually stunning gadgets, it’s the psychology of what’s happening pushes the story. Because of that, the problems Nolan had directing some of the action sequences in Batman Begins, are utterly erased here. Batman lurks in the shadows dispatching bad guys with a single punch. There are no extended, complicated fight scenes for him to botch because quite frankly the movie doesn’t need them. There’s plenty of fighting, but it happens in quick encounters staged one after another with a kind of lyrical precision I haven’t seen in anything outside of the action-poetry in last year’s The Bourne Ultimatum. When Batman is forced into an extended showdown, it takes the form of a brutal, economical beating, with punches landed with vicious force and battles being waged by men who have made themselves blunt instruments. What makes the action so arresting is the force of will behind it, the philosophical battle driving it. You’ll be on the edge of your seat for every single moment, whether it’s a simple conversation at Bruce Wayne’s office, or a balls to the wall brawl inside a Yakuza-infested Hong Kong skyscraper.

Nothing is wasted, there’s not a minute in the film that doesn’t fit into a bigger, broader, deeper picture. That goes for everything, right down to the way Nolan filmed it. When you see it (and you will), settle for nothing less than IMAX. Portions of the film were shot in specifically in IMAX, but not as some gimmick. They play a key role in setting the tone of the story. Most interior scenes are shot using normal film, and when displayed in an IMAX theater, they use only a portion of the total, massive screen, thus conveying an intimate setting. Exterior shots, flyovers of the city and amazing, breathtaking chases are done using IMAX, stretching out to cover the entire, enormous IMAX canvas, conveying a tremendous sense of scope by rote of contrast. Gorgeous, dark, city flyovers are used to hammer home the size of the world Batman and Joker are operating in, and pummel the audience with the scale of this place and hopelessness of Batman’s task in guarding it. None of that will be quite so evident seen anywhere but in IMAX, and you owe it to yourself, perhaps more with this film than with any other in the history of the format, to see it in the best way possible.

The Dark Knight is both entertainment and art, slipped into a dark, gritty package. It marks a completely new direction for that which we’ve come to know as the superhero genre, here’s hoping others have the sense to follow it. Whether or not they do it’s unlikely anyone, including Nolan himself, will ever top what’s been accomplished here. It works on every level and no matter what I’ve said about it in this review, believe me when I tell you that I’m underselling it. Movies rarely get better than this. Check your gut before you go in, The Dark Knight is going to land a punch right in the middle of it. You won’t soon forget it.

http://www.cinemablend.com/review.php?id=3238

SCHWING!
 
Raguel said:
:lol :lol the backlash on the dark knight begins. But the idiot from star magazine review just made me lost it:

"Why do comic-book movies want to be serious literature? That’s the problem with this movie the same way it was with 2006’s “Superman Returns.” Instead of being exciting pop-culture entertainment that forces the viewer to take it seriously, the movie takes itself too seriously – and misses the fun in the process...."

Saving Private Ryan? Come on! Didn't you see Hogan's Heroes? That was fun!
 
Reviews Counted: 24
Fresh: 21 Rotten:3
Average Rating: 7.8/10

The Dark Knight is noisy, jumbled, and sadistic.
This movie is grim and jammed together. The narrative isn't shaped coherently to bring out contrasts and build toward a satisfying climax. The Dark Knight is constant climax; it's always in a frenzy, and it goes on forever.
This movie is too in love with itself to make you love it.
GAF Suicide confirmed!
 
shagg_187 said:
Reviews Counted: 24
Fresh: 21 Rotten:3
Average Rating: 7.8/10




GAF Suicide confirmed!

"Why do comic-book movies want to be serious literature? That’s the problem with this movie the same way it was with 2006’s “Superman Returns.” Instead of being exciting pop-culture entertainment that forces the viewer to take it seriously, the movie takes itself too seriously – and misses the fun in the process."

wat.
 
shagg_187 said:
Reviews Counted: 24
Fresh: 21 Rotten:3
Average Rating: 7.8/10




GAF Suicide confirmed!

One of the reviewers hated batman begins, one gave that shitty Zohan adam sandler movie a fresh rating and the other liked the ben affleck shitfest Pay Cheque. I dont take any of their opinions seriously.
 
DMczaf said:
"Why do comic-book movies want to be serious literature? That’s the problem with this movie the same way it was with 2006’s “Superman Returns.” Instead of being exciting pop-culture entertainment that forces the viewer to take it seriously, the movie takes itself too seriously – and misses the fun in the process."

wat.
Yep. I found problems with this idiot also
 
This is the problem with RT. Attention whores can put whatever they want without any real reason other than to get more hits to their awful sites.
 
people at SHH just committed suicide after those negative reviews


one thing I and many other people noticed is that the "average rating score" never correlated with the actual reviews.


At one point, the average rating was 8.4 when the lowest review was only an 8.5 which seemed odd.

but really, none of this shit matters. ONE MORE DAY
 
shagg_187 said:
"The Dark Knight is constant climax; it's always in a frenzy, and it goes on forever."

One long orgasm that doesn't want to end....sweet!
 
Talas said:
I was looking for that Joker smilie the other day, please post it alone, thanks.
Another member here had it for an avatar. It was the small version but I no longer have it stored on my computer.
 
"This movie is grim and jammed together. The narrative isn't shaped coherently to bring out contrasts and build toward a satisfying climax. The Dark Knight is constant climax; it's always in a frenzy, and it goes on forever."


shit, this is 100% my opinion about BB

skepticism galore
 
Anasui Kishibe said:
"This movie is grim and jammed together. The narrative isn't shaped coherently to bring out contrasts and build toward a satisfying climax. The Dark Knight is constant climax; it's always in a frenzy, and it goes on forever."
I don't want to piss off OT, but I wouldn't be surprised if this turns out to be true. I'm really do think this is going to happen. Despite this, I'M STILL SEEING THIS IN IMAX ON OPENING DAY, BITCHES.
 
Darko said:
Movies these reviewers liked.

MARSHALL FINE
-PayCheque

DAVID EDELSTEIN
You Don't Mess with the Zohan

and he hated

David Denby
-Batman Begins



their opinions dont count :D
These arent joke characters but real people, right?

Shit. :lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom