I read the piece and found it very interesting; just responding to posts that baffled me or made me a bit confused.
Sorry, i may have used a very large brush, but the comments you are quoting are confusing because its very off-topic.
I read the piece and found it very interesting; just responding to posts that baffled me or made me a bit confused.
Brawl. Other than that, the Smash games have generally been solid (Melee being the king, with Smash 4 in 2nd).
Oh this thread is going to be a great source for laughsIts an apt comparison.
Sakurai made a good game by accident (melee) and then made a bunch of trash under the same banner because he failed to realize what people liked about it in the first place.
It seems no one actually read the piece at all. Most, if not all of the comments are very embarrassing.
He made Melee and approved of Bayonetta. He doesn't have a clean track record.![]()
Brawl. Other than that, the Smash games have generally been solid (Melee being the king, with Smash 4 in 2nd).
He made Melee and approved of Bayonetta. He doesn't have a clean track record.![]()
And bayonetta will be jar jar, I finally understand
Something something all my friends played Brawl for 10 minutes and they hated it something something not competitive enoughBrawl has a 93 on Metacritic. It's the highest rated game in the series. How is that not critically acclaimed?
Despite the tripping and the slowness, despite what Melee fans say, Brawl isn't anywhere near a bad game.
YupThis is the perfect thread to tell who is posting based on the title and who actually reads the article
A lot of people (including me) weren't fond of Brawl but it did receive great reviews, I suppose.
That being said I think he has a good track record outside of that. Kirby games and the other Smash games range from good to great and Kid Icarus Uprising is my favorite 3DS game so I wouldn't compare him to George just because of some missteps.
It seems no one actually read the piece at all. Most, if not all of the comments are very embarrassing.
He only compared himself to Lucas because the amount of work put into their respective work, there is always heavy criticism that follows which is devoid of actual knowledge of making such franchise.
How's either of those a problem? If anything, Brawl was the equivalent of the prequels.
Guys you need to stop with the revisionist BS, majority think Brawl is not only a good game but a great gameBrawl is pretty bad.
I read the article too, but I admit, I chose to respond to the title instead, knowing that that's why most people were going to be here.
The real core of this article, that Sakurai (as a creator) doesn't want creators to be discouraged by criticism, is genuinely a more interesting point of discussion. Because Sakurai has famously ignored or disregarded a lot of fan criticism in favor of what he wants his games to be.
This is all opinion. Everyone prefers a certain Smash game. Brawl isn't bad, in fact if it was released first no one would complain.
It's still regarded by a good chunk of the Smash community as the worst entry in the series. Though to be fair, there is still some fun to be had with Brawl, & it did spawn Project M.Brawl has a 93 on Metacritic. It's the highest rated game in the series. How is that not critically acclaimed?
Despite the tripping and the slowness, despite what Melee fans say, Brawl isn't anywhere near a bad game.
Describe a good chunk, because 11 million people have bought brawlIt's still regarded by a good chunk of the Smash community as the worst entry in the series. Though to be fair, there is still some fun to be had with Brawl, & it did spawn Project M.
Indeed.Um you should read his actual article, because it is very personal and moving.
And this thread is already starting to look like the problem.
He made Melee and approved of Bayonetta. He doesn't have a clean track record.![]()
And there were people that strongly criticized that, saying Stop adding non-Nintendo characters! This is completely ignoring the fact that Ive added many, many Nintendo characters to Smash. It also ignores the many fans who were overjoyed at Clouds addition. Looking at the big picture, I am on the receiving end of countless amounts of truly trivial statements.
Describe a good chunk, because 11 million people have bought brawl
It's still regarded by a good chunk of the Smash community as the worst entry in the series. Though to be fair, there is still some fun to be had with Brawl, & it did spawn Project M.
JJ for next Smash director
It's still regarded by a good chunk of the Smash community as the worst entry in the series. Though to be fair, there is still some fun to be had with Brawl, & it did spawn Project M.
That would make more sense if those were Lucas babies, but while he created and co wrote those films Spielberg directed those and it's obvious.64 is a prototype and can be easily ignored. Melee is Raiders of the Lost Ark, Brawl is Temple of Doom, while Smash Wii U/3DS is the Last Crusade. Which probably means that the next game is Kingdom of the Crystal Skull so fuck.
Go to any Smash tournament. A good number of them will shit on Brawl (though not all of them, to be sure).Smash Communtiy is the minority. Stop trying to pass opinions as facts.
Its an apt comparison.
Sakurai made a good game by accident (melee) and then made a bunch of trash under the same banner because he failed to realize what people liked about it in the first place.
Go to any Smash tournament. A good number of them will shit on Brawl (though not all of them, to be sure).
You're complaining about hit boxes for the RECENT smash games? lolToo be honest, I've had a hard time adjusting to Smash since Melee, was great at the first two.
But these new entries are too defensive and the new "attack match up" mechanic is a bit wanky. Hit boxes are nutty as hell on some the characters and two many moves rely on the sweet spot gimmick.
What I hate most though is that it feels like grabs (not the throws but the grabs themselves) have been nerfed more than they ever had.
Online is better than in Brawl but I'm seeing all sorts if crap. I recently had a match where I used a Crash Bomb on Little Mac as he was charging his down Smash, it went through him. The match had no serious lag issues either. What the hell is going on with the DNA of this game?
How is the teir list developing for SSB4? It seems like it has characters all over the place. Is it taken as seriously as Melee?
The metagame is still developing for Smash 4, & likely will start to make more progress once Corrin & Bayonetta are released. As for how seriously Smash 4 is in the FGC, it's taken pretty seriously. However, Smash 4 is usually around Melee's ball-park (sometimes above) when it comes to entrants. Though Melee has the upper-hand when it comes to viewers.Too be honest, I've had a hard time adjusting to Smash since Melee, was great at the first two.
But these new entries are too defensive and the new "attack match up" mechanic is a bit wanky. Hit boxes are nutty as hell on some the characters and two many moves rely on the sweet spot gimmick.
What I hate most though is that it feels like grabs (not the throws but the grabs themselves) have been nerfed more than they ever had.
Online is better than in Brawl but I'm seeing all sorts if crap. I recently had a match where I used a Crash Bomb on Little Mac as he was charging his down Smash, it went through him. The match had no serious lag issues either. What the hell is going on with the DNA of this game?
How is the teir list developing for SSB4? It seems like it has characters all over the place. Is it taken as seriously as Melee?
Go to any Smash tournament. A good number of them will shit on Brawl (though not all of them, to be sure).
But Sakurai's last three outputs have been good.
That's one of them, correct.kid icarus uprising
The thread title is awful. He isn't "comparing himself to George Lucas" -- he's just empathizing with him.
After reading the OP more closely, that would be a better title.The thread title is awful. He isn't "comparing himself to George Lucas" -- he's just empathizing with him.
How do you know FF7 remake isn't coming to NX?To be fair I think he misses the point of why people complained about Cloud's inclusion. I say that as a Cloud fan who bought the DLC ASAP.
It's somewhat funny that he's included a character that advertises an upcoming PlayStation exclusive AGAIN... and people complain about Corrin!
You're complaining about hit boxes for the RECENT smash games? lol
My opinion is kinda caught in the middle as to what Sakurai should do next. I do agree that he deserves a break either way. But as for what to do afterwards, there's two major things to consider.I feel like Sakurai understands good direction, while Lucas is a good ideas guy who really just got lucky.
Sakurai has an authorial presence.
I know he was more comparing how he is trapped creatively by the audience, but still, he is ultimately a better game designer than Lucas is a good director.
its sort of a shame Lucas never got around to do his "experimental stuff" I hope Sakurai is able to just produce the smash games and let someone with a fresh take build on his groundwork, maybe expand the modes available. He is a very talented guy and should be able to explore his creativity.
Hit boxes in 4 are far from perfect. Instead of hitting where it looked like it didn't it has the opposite effect. I can't count the number of times Marth's sword has passed strait through an opponent without doing anything.
Same.The title is just kind of misleading. I came into the thread thinking Sakurai was confirming he was handing Smash off to someone else.
I saw someone like you in Sakurai comments/articleIt's still regarded by a good chunk of the Smash community as the worst entry in the series. Though to be fair, there is still some fun to be had with Brawl, & it did spawn Project M.
Yes, thread confirming Sakurai's article.Um you should read his actual article, because it is very personal and moving.
And this thread is already starting to look like the problem.