I have a high performance PS4. It's called a PC.
Too easy?!
My guess would be a high performance Ps4 to better handle VR games.
Hey, at least we have Gravity Rush 2for PS4
Woah, they said "Vita"!
The original was a PS3 exclusive before it moved to Vita though.Yep, keep taking those Vita exclusives away Sony !
That move completely soured my views on Sony :'(.
Nintendo fans ate up the N3DS without much complaining, so I guess there is a market for such a thing.
I doubt they'll do it though.
The original was a PS3 exclusive before it moved to Vita though.
High performance ps4...
Hmmmmm.
The high performance PS4 is not going to cost more than current PS4 if it was just simply an upclock with a possible die shrink. An upclock can move the PS4 from 1.8TF to 2+TF from the same APU at no cost increase but a possible decrease in cost.N3DS costs significantly less than a high performance PS4 would. Not really a fair comparison.
Did most people suddenly forget Apple is on a yearly cycle with the iPad that does not render the older model useless? i welcome a mid gen performance bump if handled properly
Then why buy a console rather than a PC?Did most people suddenly forget Apple is on a yearly cycle with the iPad that does not render the older model useless? i welcome a mid gen performance bump if handled properly
That still doesn't make sense. You've already had your chance to play the game on PS Vita. Nobody is buying Vita for Tearaway, not in droves anyway so what does it matter that PS4 owners get to play the game now?I guess the better example is Tearaway then (and that bombed worse on PS4 too X().
Still, bites that Vita exclusives are jumping ship but that's a different topic all together. Personally done with Sony (only getting a PS4 for Ratchet & Clank, KH3 and FFXV) though.
Then why buy a console rather than a PC?
That move completely soured my views on Sony :'(.
Hopefully they call it Playstation 5 and it comes out 3-4 years from now.
I don't want any first party stuff from Sony anyway, most of their -alive- franchises are not that interesting. Just continue to pay 3rd parties to support the system. I'm ok with working ports like RE:R2 or XCOM.
Did most people suddenly forget Apple is on a yearly cycle with the iPad that does not render the older model useless? i welcome a mid gen performance bump if handled properly
That still doesn't make sense. You've already had your chance to play the game on PS Vita. Nobody is buying Vita for Tearaway, not in droves anyway so what does it matter that PS4 owners get to play the game now?
Handhelds have a long history of mid/late cycle architecture upgrades though going back to the late 90s. GBC, NGPC, WSC, DSi, n3DS, even the PSP 2000/3000 really (doubled ram). Although consoles used to too really, it just usually came with a media add-on (FDS, TG-CD, Sega CD, 64DD, etc), although not always (32X, Saturn/N64 RAM carts).Nintendo fans ate up the N3DS without much complaining, so I guess there is a market for such a thing.
I doubt they'll do it though.
N3DS costs significantly less than a high performance PS4 would. Not really a fair comparison.
Who's to say how well a PlayStation 4.5 would do. It would confuse the average consumer tho, just like how the average consumer think the Wii-U is just an upgraded Wii. Also just like the Xbox One with Kinect and the Xbox One by itself, the average consumer would just choose the cheaper version. "They're the same thing basically right, just this one is cheaper?"